Natural Resources Research

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 39–56 | Cite as

The Evolution of Giant Oil Field Production Behavior

  • Mikael HöökEmail author
  • Bengt Söderbergh
  • Kristofer Jakobsson
  • Kjell Aleklett


The giant oil fields of the world are only a small fraction of the total number of fields, but their importance is huge. Over 50% of the world’s oil production came from giants by 2005 and more than half of the world’s ultimate reserves are found in giants. Based on this, it is reasonable to assume that the future development of the giant oil fields will have a significant impact on the world oil supply. In order to better understand the giant fields and their future behavior, one must first understand their history. This study has used a comprehensive database on giant oil fields in order to determine their typical parameters, such as the average decline rate and life-times of giants. The evolution of giant oil field behavior has been investigated to better understand future behavior. One conclusion is that new technology and production methods have generally led to high depletion rates and rapid decline. The historical trend points towards high decline rates of fields currently on plateau production. The peak production generally occurs before half the ultimate reserves have been produced in giant oil fields. A strong correlation between depletion-at-peak and average decline rate is also found, verifying that high depletion rate leads to rapid decline. Our result also implies that depletion analysis can be used to rule out unrealistic production expectations from a known reserve, or to connect an estimated production level to a needed reserve base.


Giant oil fields field behavior peak oil depletion 



We would like to thank Fredrik Robelius for providing us with helpful insights and valuable help on acquiring the field data. We would also like to thank Professor Chen Yuanqian at the CNPC Research Institute of Exploration and Development for providing useful discussions about oil field modelling. Finally, we would like to give our appreciation to Michael Lardelli for proof-reading.


  1. AAPG, 1970, Geology of giant petroleum fields: Memoir 14, 575 p.Google Scholar
  2. AAPG, 1980, Giant oil and gas fields of the decade 1968–1978: Memoir 30, 596 p.Google Scholar
  3. AAPG, 1992, Giant oil and gas fields of the decade 1978–1988: Memoir 54, 526 p.Google Scholar
  4. AAPG, 2003, Giant oil and gas fields of the decade 1990–1999: Memoir 78, 340 p.Google Scholar
  5. AAPG, 2005, Saudi Arabia’s Ghawar field—the elephant of all elephants: AAPG Explorer, no. 1,
  6. Arab Oil & Gas Directory, 1980–2008, Arab Oil & Gas Directory 2008 and previous editions: Annual publication by the Arab Oil & Gas Research Center, See also:
  7. Arps, J. J., 1945, Analysis of Decline Curves, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, 1945, v. 160, p. 228–247.Google Scholar
  8. Babadagli, T., 2007, Development of mature oil fields — A review, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, v. 57, no.3–4, p. 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bentley, R., Mannan, S. A., and Wheeler, S. J., 2007, Assessing the date of the global oil peak: The need to use 2P reserves, Energy Policy, v. 35, no. 12, p. 6364–6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CERA, 2007, Finding the critical numbers: what are the real decline rates for global oil production?: Private report, 21 p.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, C., and Laherrère, J., 1998, The end of cheap oil: Scientific American, March 1998.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, C. J., and Sivertsson, A., 2003, Updating the depletion model, in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Oil Depletion, Paris, France, 26–27 May 2003, 16 p. See also:
  13. Campbell, C. J., and Heapes, S., 2008, An atlas of oil and gas depletion: Jeremy Mills Publishing, Lindley, 396 p.Google Scholar
  14. Doublet, L. E., Pande, P. K., McCollom, T. J., and Blasingame, T. A., 1994, Decline curve analysis using type curves-analysis of oil well production data using material balance time: application to field cases, Society of Petroleum Engineers Paper Presented at the International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, 10–13 October 1994, Veracruz, Mexico, SPE paper 28688-MS, 24 p.Google Scholar
  15. Feygin, M. V., and Ryzhik, V. M, 2001, Estimation of the Oil Reserves Requirement to Meet a Given Production Level - Mathematical Modeling, Natural Resources Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fetkovich, M. J., 1980, Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves, Journal of Petroleum Technology, v. 32, no. 6, p. 1065–1077.Google Scholar
  17. Gowdy, J., Juliá, R., 2007, Technology and petroleum exhaustion: Evidence from two mega-oilfields, Energy, v. 32, no. 8, p. 1448–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirsch, R., 2008, Mitigation of maximum world oil production: Shortage scenarios, Energy Policy, v. 36, no. 2, p. 881–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hubbert, M. K., 1956, Nuclear energy and the fossil fuels, Publication no. 95: Shell Development Company, Houston, Texas, 40 p. See also:
  20. Hurst, R., 1934, Unsteady flow of fluids in Oil Reservoirs, Journal of Applied Physics, v. 5, no. 20, p. 20–30.Google Scholar
  21. Höök, M., Aleklett, K., 2008, A decline rate study of Norwegian Oil Production, Energy Policy, 36(11): 4262–4271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Höök, M., Hirsch, R., and Aleklett, K., 2008, Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production: Global Energy Systems, report GES PP-09:2, see also:
  23. IEA, 2008, World Energy Outlook 2008: see also:
  24. Jakobsson, K., Söderbergh, B., Höök, M., and Aleklett, K., 2008, The maximum depletion rate model for forecasting oil production: its uses and misuses: Global Energy Systems, report PP-09:1, see also:
  25. James, K. H., 2000, The Venezuelan hydrocarbon habitat, part 2: hydrocarbon occurrences and generated-accumulated volumes, Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 23 no.2, p. 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lynch, M. C., (2003) Petroleum resources pessimism debunked in Hubbert model and Hubbert modeler’s assumptions, Oil Gas J. 101(27): 38–47.Google Scholar
  27. Mueller, R. K., Eggert, D. J., Swanson, H. S., 1981, Petroleum decline analysis using time series, Energy Economics 3(4):256–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mäkivierikko, A., 2007, Russian oil—a depletion rate model estimate of the future Russian oil production and export: Diploma thesis from Uppsala University, see also:
  29. Nehring, R., 1978, Giant oil fields and world oil resources: Report prepared by the RAND Corporation for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), see also:
  30. Robelius, F., 2007, Giant oil fields—the highway to oil: giant oil fields and their importance for future oil production: Doctoral thesis from Uppsala University, 156 p. See also:
  31. Saudi-Aramco, 2004, Fifty-year crude oil supply scenarios: Saudi Aramco’s perspective. Presented by Mahmoud M. Abdul Baqi and Nansen G. Saleri, 24 February 2004 at Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, USA. Available from:
  32. Simmons, M., 2002, The world’s giant oilfields: White paper, 9 January 2002, see also:
  33. Simmons, M., 2005, Twilight in the desert: the coming Saudi oil shock and the world economy: Wiley, New york, 448 p.Google Scholar
  34. van Everdingen, A. F., Hurst, W., 1949, The application of the Laplace transformation to flow problems in reservoirs. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers 186:305–324.Google Scholar
  35. Zittel, W., 2001, Analysis of the UK oil production. Contribution to the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas (ASPO), see also:

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikael Höök
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bengt Söderbergh
    • 1
  • Kristofer Jakobsson
    • 1
  • Kjell Aleklett
    • 1
  1. 1.Global Energy Systems, Department of Physics and AstronomyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations