Advertisement

The zeta potentials of g-C3N4 nanoparticles: Effect of electrolyte, ionic strength, pH, and humic acid

  • Shunan DongEmail author
  • Zhuo Zeng
  • Wangwei Cai
  • Zhiyue Zhou
  • Chuanbin Dou
  • Han Liu
  • Jihong XiaEmail author
Research Paper
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, zeta potentials of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanoparticles were detailedly investigated under various electrolytes, solution pH, and humic acid (HA) concentration conditions. The hydrodynamic radius of g-C3N4 nanoparticles was measured to be 388.9 ± 24 nm, and the specific surface area of the g-C3N4 nanoparticles was measured to be 46.2 m2 g−1. The absolute values of g-C3N4 zeta potentials significantly decreased with the increasing ionic strength (IS) due to the charge screening. Compared to the monovalent cation, the zeta potentials of g-C3N4 were less negative with the presence of divalent cations. In addition, K+ was more effective than Na+ in decreasing the absolute values of g-C3N4 zeta potentials, and Ca2+ was more effective than Mg2+ in decreasing the absolute values of g-C3N4 zeta potentials. When NaCl and CaCl2 were used as the electrolytes, the zeta potentials of g-C3N4 became less negative with the decreasing pH conditions. When FeCl3 and AlCl3 were used as the electrolytes, the zeta potentials of g-C3N4 became more positive with increasing solution pH due to the changing species of Fe3+ and Al3+. The zeta potentials of g-C3N4 were significantly more negative with the presence of HA. The results from this work indicated electrolytes, solution pH, and HA concentration conditions play a complex role in zeta potentials of g-C3N4 nanoparticles in aqueous environment.

Keywords

Zeta potentials g-C3N4 nanoparticles Aqueous environment Electrolyte pH Humic acid Colloids 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0900805), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41907160), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019B01914).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alimi OS, Farner Budarz J, Hernandez LM, Tufenkji N (2018) Microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments: aggregation, deposition, and enhanced contaminant transport. Environ Sci Technol 52:1704–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alotaibi MB, Nasr-El-Din HA (2011) Electrokinetics of limestone particles and crude-oil droplets in saline solutions. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 14:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alroudhan A, Vinogradov J, Jackson MD (2016) Zeta potential of intact natural limestone: impact of potential-determining ions Ca, Mg and SO4. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 493:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azimi EB, Badiei A, Sadr MH, Amiri A (2018) A template-free method to synthesize porous g-C3N4 with efficient visible light photodegradation of organic pollutants in water. Adv Powder Technol 29:2785–2791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bizmark N, Ioannidis MA (2015) Effects of ionic strength on the colloidal stability and interfacial assembly of hydrophobic ethyl cellulose nanoparticles. Langmuir 31:9282–9289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chassagne C, Mietta F, Winterwerp JC (2009) Electrokinetic study of kaolinite suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 336:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen L, Zhang G, Wang L, Wu W, Ge J (2014) Zeta potential of limestone in a large range of salinity. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 450:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chowdhury I, Mansukhani ND, Guiney LM, Hersam MC, Bouchard D (2015) Aggregation and stability of reduced graphene oxide: complex roles of divalent cations, pH, and natural organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 49:10886–10893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong S, Sun Y, Gao B, Shi X, Xu H, Wu J, Wu J (2017) Retention and transport of graphene oxide in water-saturated limestone media. Chemosphere 180:506–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan W, Jiang X, Yang W, Geng Z, Huo M, Liu Z, Zhou H (2015) Transport of graphene oxide in saturated porous media: effect of cation composition in mixed Na-Ca electrolyte systems. Sci Total Environ 511:509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gong S, Jiang Z, Zhu S, Fan J, Xu Q, Min Y (2018) The synthesis of graphene-TiO2/g-C3N4 super-thin heterojunctions with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activities. J Nanopart Res 20:310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gunsolus IL, Mousavi MPS, Hussein K, Buhlmann P, Haynes CL (2015) Effects of humic and fulvic acids on silver nanoparticle stability, dissolution, and toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 49:8078–8086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hao X, Ji X, Zhang Q (2016) Effective improvement of the photocatalytic efficiency of g-C3N4 by a green hydrothermal treatment method. Mater Lett 185:29–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horzempa LM, Helz GR (1979) Controls on the stability of sulfide sols: colloidal covellite as an example. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 43:1645–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang S, Zhao Y, Hu X, Liu D, Wang X, Su Y (2018) CsTaWO6 as photoelectron platform by carbon nitride sensitizing toward enhanced charge carrier separation and photocatalytic activity. J Nanopart Res 20:281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huynh KA, Chen KL (2011) Aggregation kinetics of citrate and polyvinylpyrrolidone coated silver nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolyte solutions. Environ Sci Technol 45:5564–5571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jailani S, Franks GV, Healy TW (2008) Zeta potential of nanoparticle suspensions: effect of electrolyte concentration, particle size, and volume fraction. J Am Ceram Soc 91:1141–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jayalath S, Wu HB, Larsen SC, Grassian VH (2018) Surface adsorption of suwannee river humic acid on TiO2 nanoparticles: a study of pH and particle size. Langmuir 34:3136–3145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang L, Liu Y, Zeng G, Liu S, Que W, Li J, Li M, Wen J (2018) Adsorption of 17 beta-estradiol by graphene oxide: effect of heteroaggregation with inorganic nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 343:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jin H, Guo C, Liu X, Liu J, Vasileff A, Jiao Y, Zheng Y, Qiao S (2018) Emerging two-dimensional nanomaterials for electrocatalysis. Chem Rev 118:6337–6408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lay ML, Wu H, Huang C (1995) Study of the zeta potential of Fe(O)OH colloids. J Mater Sci 30:5473–5478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee J, Bartelt-Hunt SL, Li Y, Gilrein EJ (2016) The influence of ionic strength and organic compounds on nanoparticle TiO2 (n-TiO2) aggregation. Chemosphere 154:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Y, Zhang J, Wang Q, Jin Y, Huang D, Cui Q, Zou G (2010) Nitrogen-rich carbon nitride hollow vessels: synthesis, characterization, and their properties. J Phys Chem B 114:9429–9434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li Z, Xu R, Li J, Hong Z (2016) Effect of clay colloids on the zeta potential of Fe/Al oxide-coated quartz: a streaming potential study. J Soils Sediments 16:2676–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X, Xu H, Gao B, Sun Y, Shi X, Wu J (2017) Retention and transport of PAH-degrading bacterium herbaspirillum chlorophenolicum FA1 in saturated porous media under various physicochemical conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Z, Xie D, Xu R (2018) Influence of goethite colloid retention on the zeta potential of saturated porous media. J Soils Sediments 18:1844–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu J, Zhang T, Wang Z, Dawson G, Chen W (2011) Simple pyrolysis of urea into graphitic carbon nitride with recyclable adsorption and photocatalytic activity. J Mater Chem 21:14398–14401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu D, Lu C, Wu J (2018) CuO/g-C3N4 nanocomposite for elemental mercury capture at low temperature. J Nanopart Res 20:277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lv X, Gao B, Sun Y, Shi X, Xu H, Wu J (2014) Effects of humic acid and solution chemistry on the retention and transport of cerium dioxide nanoparticles in saturated porous media. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin RB (1991) Fe3+ and Al3+ hydrolysis equilibria. Cooperativity in Al3+ hydrolysis reactions. J Inorg Biochem 44:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Masih D, Ma Y, Rohani S (2017) Graphitic C3N4 based noble-metal-free photocatalyst systems: a review. Appl Catal B 206:556–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murugan C, Nataraj RA, Kumar MP, Ravichandran S, Pandikumar A (2019) Enhanced charge transfer process of bismuth vanadate interleaved graphitic carbon nitride nanohybrids in mediator-free direct z scheme photoelectrocatalytic water splitting. Chemistryselect 4:4653–4663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oh J, Shim Y, Lee S, Park S, Jang D, Shin Y, Ohn S, Kim J, Park S (2018) Structural insights into photocatalytic performance of carbon nitrides for degradation of organic pollutants. J Solid State Chem 258:559–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ong WJ, Tan LL, Chai SP, Yong ST, Mohamed AR (2015) Surface charge modification via protonation of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) for electrostatic self-assembly construction of 2D/2D reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/g-C3N4 nanostructures toward enhanced photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to methane. Nano Energy 13:757–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ong WJ, Tan LL, Ng YH, Yong ST, Chai SP (2016) Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability? Chem Rev 116:7159–7329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Park S, Lee KS, Bozoklu G, Cai W, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2008) Graphene oxide papers modified by divalent ions—enhancing mechanical properties via chemical cross-linking. ACS Nano 2:572–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Petosa AR, Jaisi DP, Quevedo IR, Elimelech M, Tufenkji N (2010) Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol 44:6532–6549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pham M, Mintz EA, Nguyen TH (2009) Deposition kinetics of bacteriophage MS2 to natural organic matter: role of divalent cations. J Colloid Interface Sci 338:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qi Z, Zhang L, Wang F, Hou L, Chen W (2014) Factors controlling transport of graphene oxide nanoparticles in saturated sand columns. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:998–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salis A, Ninham BW (2014) Models and mechanisms of Hofmeister effects in electrolyte solutions, and colloid and protein systems revisited. Chem Soc Rev 43:7358–7377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarkar S, Bhattacharjee C, Curcio S (2015) Studies on adsorption, reaction mechanisms and kinetics for photocatalytic degradation of CHD, a pharmaceutical waste. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 121:154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shiravand G, Badiei A, Ziarani GM (2017) Carboxyl-rich g-C3N4 nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and their application for selective fluorescence sensing of Hg2+ and Fe3+ in aqueous media. Sensors Actuators B Chem 242:244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh BP, Gaydardzhiev S, Ay P (2006) Stabilization of aqueous silicon nitride suspension with Dolapix A88. J Dispers Sci Technol 27:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Szabó T, Tombácz E, Illés E, Dékány I (2006) Enhanced acidity and pH-dependent surface charge characterization of successively oxidized graphite oxides. Carbon 44:537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tantra R, Schulze P, Quincey P (2010) Effect of nanoparticle concentration on zeta-potential measurement results and reproducibility. Particuology 8:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas A, Fischer A, Goettmann F, Antonietti M, Mueller JO, Schloegl R, Carlsson JM (2008) Graphitic carbon nitride materials: variation of structure and morphology and their use as metal-free catalysts. J Mater Chem 18:4893–4908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang X, Maeda K, Thomas A, Takanabe K, Xin G, Carlsson JM, Domen K, Antonietti M (2009) A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat Mater 8:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang M, Gao B, Tang D, Sun H, Yin X, Yu C (2018a) Effects of temperature on aggregation kinetics of graphene oxide in aqueous solutions. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 538:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang X, Xiong W, Li X, Zhao Q, Fan S, Zhang M, Mu J, Chen A (2018b) Fabrication of MoS2@g-C3N4 core-shell nanospheres for visible light photocatalytic degradation of toluene. J Nanopart Res 20:243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wei H, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Zhu A, Dionysiou DD (2016) Enhancement of the Cr(VI) adsorption and photocatalytic reduction activity of g-C3N4 by hydrothermal treatment in HNO3 aqueous solution. Appl Catal A 521:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu L, Liu L, Gao B, Muñoz-Carpena R, Zhang M, Chen H, Zhou Z, Wang H (2013) Aggregation kinetics of graphene oxides in aqueous solutions: experiments, mechanisms, and modeling. Langmuir 29:15174–15181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xia T, Qi Y, Liu J, Qi Z, Chen W, Wiesner MR (2017) Cation-inhibited transport of graphene oxide nanomaterials in saturated porous media: the Hofmeister effects. Environ Sci Technol 51:828–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xiao J, Zhang X, Li Y (2015) A ternary g-C3N4/Pt/ZnO photoanode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:9080-9087Google Scholar
  54. Xu G, Zhang J, Li G, Song G (2003) Effect of complexation on the zeta potential of titanium dioxide dispersions. J Dispers Sci Technol 24:527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yang L, Liu X, Liu Z, Wang C, Liu G, Li Q, Feng X (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4 2D nanosheets through thermal exfoliation using dicyandiamide as precursor. Ceram Int 44:20613–20619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Shi Q, Cai Z, Yang Z (2015) Acid-treated g-C3N4 with improved photocatalytic performance in the reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) under visible-light. Sep Purif Technol 142:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao J, Wang Z, White JC, Xing B (2014a) Graphene in the aquatic environment: adsorption, dispersion, toxicity and transformation. Environ Sci Technol 48:9995–10009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhao W, Walker SL, Huang Q, Cai P (2014b) Adhesion of bacterial pathogens to soil colloidal particles: influences of cell type, natural organic matter, and solution chemistry. Water Res 53:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu B, Xia P, Ho W, Yu J (2015) Isoelectric point and adsorption activity of porous g-C3N4. Appl Surf Sci 344:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Agricultural EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations