Advertisement

Single-crystalline α-Fe2O3 nanohexahedron as outstanding anode material for lithium-ion batteries

  • Jinxiang Diao
  • Gang Wang
  • Shenghua Ma
  • Xiaojie Liu
Research Paper
  • 109 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, single-crystalline hexahedron hematite is successfully obtained by a simple hydrothermal approach with assistance of PVP as surfactant. SEM and XRD results show that the as-obtained α-Fe2O3 has a nanohexahedron shape with high uniformity and high crystallinity. The effects of a few factors influencing the morphology of α-Fe2O3, such as PVP amount, reaction temperature, etc., are investigated carefully. More importantly, time-dependent experiments are carried out to have in-depth insight into the formation of the single-crystalline α-Fe2O3 nanohexahedron. Based on the full characterization of as-obtained α-Fe2O3, it is concluded that PVP as surfactant plays an important role in the formation of the hexahedron shape of α-Fe2O3. Besides, the proposed formation mechanism of α-Fe2O3 nanohexahedron is that the shape of α-Fe2O3 evolves from the nuclei, needle-like shapes, and urchin-like aggregates to the hexahedron shape, driven by minimization of surface energy and Ostwald ripening. When used as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries, nanohexahedron α-Fe2O3 shows a high rate capability. Moreover, after 150 cycles, the storage capacity of α-Fe2O3 is still up to 680 mAh g−1 and almost remains unchanged, suggesting high cyclability.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Iron oxide Hydrothermal method PVP Anode material Lithium-ion batteries Energy storage 

Notes

Funding information

We acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21601144), Xi’an Science and Technology Project-Engineering program of University and Institute Talents Servicing Enterprise (2017085CG/RC048(XBDX006)), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2017JM2025).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11051_2018_4207_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15.8 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 16170 kb)

References

  1. Ansari MO, Ahmad MF, Parveen N, Ahmad S, Jameel S, Shadab GGHA (2017) Iron oxide nanoparticles-synthesis, surface modification, applications and toxicity: a review. Mater Focus 6:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armand M, Tarascon JM (2008) Building better batteries. Nature 451:652–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen J, Xu L, Li W, Gou X (2005) α-Fe2O3 nanotubes in gas sensor and lithium ion battery applications. Adv Mater 17:582–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi SH, Lee JH, Kang YC (2015) Perforated metal oxide-carbon nanotube composite microspheres with enhanced lithium-ion storage properties. ACS Nano 9:10173–10185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng Y, Zhang H, Li W, Fang L, Wang Y (2016) Targeted synthesis of novel hierarchical sandwiched NiO/C arrays as high-efficiency lithium ion batteries anode. J Power Sources 301:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fu YY, Wang RM, Xu J, Chen J, Yan Y, Narlikar AV, Zhang H (2003) Synthesis of large arrays of aligned α-Fe2O3 nanowires. Chem Phys Lett 379:373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Han S, Hu L, Liang Z, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Chen Y, Fang X (2014) One-step hydrothermal synthesis of 2D hexagonal nanoplates of α-Fe2O3/graphene composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Adv Funct Mater 24:5719–5727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hemery G, Keyes AC, Garaio E, Rodrigo I, Garcia JA, Plazaola F, Garanger E, Sandre O (2017) Tuning sizes, morphologies, and magnetic properties of monocore versus multicore iron oxide nanoparticles through the controlled addition of water in the polyol synthesis. Inorg Chem 568:232–8243Google Scholar
  9. Hu C, Gao Z, Yang X (2007) Facile synthesis of single crystalline α-Fe2O3 ellipsoidal nanoparticles and its catalytic performance for removal of carbon monoxide. Mater Chem Phys 104:429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ji D, Zhou H, Tong Y, Wang J, Zhu M, Chen T, Yuan A (2017) Facile fabrication of MOF-derived octahedral CuO wrapped 3D graphene network as binder-free anode for high performance lithium-ion batteries. Chem Eng J 313:1623–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jia CJ, Sun LD, Yan ZG, You LP, Luo F, Han XD, Pang YC, Zhang Z, Yan CH (2005) Single-crystalline iron oxide nanotubes. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:4328–4333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwon K, Lim H, Sun Y, Suh K (2014) α-Fe2O3 submicron spheres with hollow and macroporous structures as high-performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J Phys Chem C 118:2897–2907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li S, Zhang H, Wu J, Ma X, Yang D (2006) Shape-control fabrication and characterization of the airplane-like FeO(OH) and Fe2O3 nanostructures. Cryst Growth Des 6:351–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li WH, Zeng LC, Wu Y, Yu Y (2016) Nanostructured electrode materials for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries via electrospinning. Sci China Mater 59:287–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin Q, Wang J, Zhong Y, Sunarso J, Tadé MO, Li L, Shao Z (2016) High performance porous iron oxide-carbon nanotube nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 212:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu X, Wang H, Su C, Zhang P, Bai J (2010) Controlled fabrication and characterization of microspherical FeCO3 and α-Fe2O3. J Colloid Interface Sci 351:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mao B, Kang Z, Wang E, Tian C, Zhang Z, Wang C, Song Y, Li M (2007) Template free fabrication of hollow hematite spheres via a one-pot polyoxometalate-assisted hydrolysis process. J Solid State Chem 180:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Padwal PM, Kadam SL, Mane SM, Kulkarni SB (2016) Enhanced specific capacitance and supercapacitive properties of polyaniline–iron oxide (PANI–Fe2O3) composite electrode material. J Mater Sci 51:10499–10505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Piper DM, Travis JJ, Young M, Son SB, Kim SC, Oh KH, George SM, Ban C, Lee SH (2014) Reversible high-capacity Si nanocomposite anodes for lithium-ion batteries enabled by molecular layer deposition. Adv Mater 26:1596–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qiang Z, Chen YM, Gurkan B, Guo Y, Cakmak M, Cavicchi KA, Zhu Y, Vogt BD (2017) Cooperatively assembled, nitrogen-doped, ordered mesoporous carbon/iron oxide nanocomposites for low-cost, long cycle life sodium-ion batteries. Carbon 116:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmitt J, Hajiw S, Lecchi A, Degrouard J, Salonen A, Clerc MI, Pansu B (2016) Formation of superlattices of gold nanoparticles using Ostwald ripening in emulsions: transition from fcc to bcc structure. J Phys Chem B 120(25):5759–5766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Suber L, Imperatori P, Ausanio G, Fabbri F, Hofmeister H (2005) Synthesis, morphology, and magnetic characterization of iron oxide nanowires and nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 109:7103–7109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun H, Xin G, Hu T, Yu M, Shao D, Sun X, Lian J (2014) High-rate lithiation-induced reactivation of mesoporous hollow spheres for long-lived lithium-ion batteries. Nat Commun 5:4526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang G, Sun Y, Li D, Wei W, Feng X, Müllen K (2016) Constructing hierarchically hollow core–shell MnO2/C hybrid spheres for high-performance lithium storage. Small 12(29):3914–3919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xia Y, Xiao Z, Dou X, Huang H, Lu XH, Yan RJ, Gan YP, Zhu WJ, Tu JP, Zhang WK, Tao XY (2013) Green and facile fabrication of hollow porous MnO/C microspheres from microalgaes for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Nano 7:7083–7079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang YQ, Ma ZL, Liu DD, Dou S, Ma JM, Zhang M, Guo ZP, Chen R, Wang SY (2017a) P-Type SnO thin layers on n-type SnS2 nanosheets with enriched surface defects and embedded charge transfer for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 5(2):512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang L, Zhao K, Yu R, Yan M, Xu W, Dong Y, Ren W, Xu X, Tang C, Mai L (2017b) Phosphorus enhanced intermolecular interactions of SnO2 and graphene as an ultrastable lithium battery anode. Small 13(20):1603973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhong LS, Hu JS, Liang HP, Cao AM, Song WG, Wan LJ (2006) Self-assembled 3D flowerlike iron oxide nanostructures and their application in water treatment. Adv Mater 18:2426–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou H, Wong SS (2008) A facile and mild synthesis of 1-D ZnO, CuO, and α-Fe2O3 nanostructures and nanostructured arrays. ACS Nano 2:944–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhu J, Lu Y, Chen C, Ge Y, Jasper S, Leary JD, Li D, Jiang M, Zhang X (2016) Porous one-dimensional carbon/iron oxide composite for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries with high and stable capacity. J Alloy Compd 672:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Synthetic and Natural Functional Molecule Chemistry (Ministry of Education), College of Chemistry & Materials ScienceNorthwest UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Aeronautical Polytechnic InstituteXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.National Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Technology and Functional Materials (Culture Base), National Photoelectric Technology and Functional Materials & Application International Cooperation Base, Institute of Photonics & Photon-TechnologyNorthwest UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations