Advertisement

Synthesis, photoelectrochemical properties and solar light-induced photocatalytic activity of bismuth ferrite nanoparticles

  • Sambhu Prasad PattnaikEmail author
  • Arjun Behera
  • Satyabadi Martha
  • Rashmi Acharya
  • Kulamani ParidaEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Bismuth ferrite (BFO) nanoparticles prepared by solid state reaction route were characterized by various characterization techniques such as XRD, FESEM, HRTEM, UV–Vis DRS, PL etc., and their photocatalytic activities were evaluated by decolorization of aqueous solution of Congo red (CR) under solar light. The photocatalytic activity of BFO was increased by increasing the preparation temperature from 350 to 500 °C and then decreased with rise in temperature. The results of electrochemical measurements such as linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), electrochemical impedence (EIS), and Mott–Schottky analysis of BFO nanoparticles corroborated the findings of their photocatalytic activity. The enhanced photocatalytic response of the sample prepared at 500 °C is attributed to its smallest band gap, minimum crystallite size (30 nm), efficient separation, and lowest possible recombination of photo-generated charge carriers. The effects of amount of nano-BFO, irradiation time, initial CR concentration, and BFO calcination temperature on the decolorization of CR were examined. It was observed that 1 g/L nano-BFO calcined at 500 °C can decolorize up to 77% a 10-ppm CR dye solution under solar irradiation for 60 min. The studies included scavenger tests for identification of reactive species and a possible mechanism of dye decolorization.

Keywords

BFO Photocatalysis Solid-state reaction bismuth ferrite Photoelectrochemical properties Congo red decolorization Energy conversion 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad M, Mohammad RF, Mohammad RM (2012) Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD. World J Nano Sci Eng 2:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai X, Wei J, Tian B, Liu Y, Reiss T, Guiblin N, Gemeiner P, Dkhil B, Infante IC (2016) Size effect on optical and photocatalytic properties in BiFeO3 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 120(7):3595–3601.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumanis C, Bahnemann DW (2008) TiO2 thin film electrodes: correlation between photocatalytic activity and electrochemical properties. J Phys ChemC 112:19097–19101Google Scholar
  4. Beranek R (2011) (Photo)electrochemical methods for the determination of the band edge positions of TiO2-based nanomaterials. Adv Phys Chem 2011:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/786759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bharathkumar S, Sakar M, Balakumar S (2016) Experimental evidence for the carrier transportation enhanced visible light driven photocatalytic process in bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) one-dimensional fiber nanostructures. J Phys Chem C 120(33):18811–18821.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi T, Lee S, Choi YJ, Kiryukhin V, Cheong SW (2009) Switchable ferroelectric diode and photovoltaic effect in BiFeO3. Science 324(5923):63–66.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhanalakshmi R, Muneeswaran M, Vanga PR, Ashok M, Giridharan NV (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of hydrothermally grown BiFeO3 nanostructures and role of catalyst recyclability in photocatalysis based on magnetic framework. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 122(1):13–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-015-9527-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao F, Yuan Y, Wang KF, Chen XY, Chen F, Liu JM, Ren ZF (2006) Preparation and photo absorption characterization of BiFeO3 nanowires. Appl Phys Lett 89(10):102506.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2345825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao F, Chen X, Yin K, Dong S, Ren Z, Yuan F, Yu T, Zou Z, Liu J (2007) Visible- light photocatalytic properties of weak magnetic BiFeO3, nanoparticles. Adv Mater 19(19):2889–2892.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200602377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao T, Chen Z, Zhu Y, Niu F, Huang Q, Qin L, Sun X, Huang Y (2014) Synthesis of BiFeO3 nanoparticles for the visible-light induced photocatalytic property. Mater Res Bull 59:6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.06.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giannakopoulou T, Papailias I, Todorova N, Boukos N, Liu Y, Yu J, Trapalis C (2016) Tailoring the energy band gap and edges’ potentials of g-C3N4/TiO2 composite photocatalysts for NOx removal. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.102
  12. Jiang JZ, Zou J, Anjum MN, Yan JC, Huang L, Zhang YX, Chen JF (2011) Synthesis and characterization of wafer-like BiFeO3 with efficient catalytic activity. Solid State Sci 13:1779–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jing LQ, Zhou W, Tian GH, HG F (2013) Surface tuning for oxide based nanomaterials as efficient photocatalysts. Chem Soc Rev 42(24):9509–9549.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60176eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joshi UA, Jang JS, Borse PH, Lee JS (2008) Microwave synthesis of single crystalline perovskite BiFeO3 nanocubes for photoelectrode and photocatalytic applications. Appl Phys Lett 92(24):242106.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2946486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kandi D, Martha S, Thirumurugan A, Parida KM (2017) Modification of BiOI microplates with CdS QDs for enhancing stability, optical property, electronic behavior toward rhodamine B decolorization and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J Phys Chem C 121(9):4834–4849.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA (2004) TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: kinetic and mechanistic investigations: a review. Appl Catal B Env 49(1):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar M, Palkar VR, Srinivas K, Suryanarayana SV (2000) Ferroelectricity in a pure BiFeO3 ceramic. Appl Phys Lett 76(19):2764–2766.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.126468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Langford JI, Wilson AJC (1978) Scherrer after sixty years: a survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size. J Appl Crystallogr 11(2):102–113.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889878012844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li S, Lin Y, Zhang HBP, Wang Y, Nan CW (2010) Controlled fabrication of BiFeO3 uniform microcrystals and their magnetic and photocatalytic behaviours. J Phys Chem C 114(7):2903–2908.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp910401uCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li D, Guo Y, Hu C, Jiang C, Wang E (2004) Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic property of the PW11O397−/TiO2 composite film towards azo-dye degradation. J Mol Catal 207:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martha S, Reddy KH, Parida KM, Satapathy PK (2012b) Enhanced photocatalytic activity over N-doped Ga, Zn mixed oxide under visible light irradiation. Intern J Hydro Energ 37(1):115–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martha S, Padhi DK, Parida KM (2014a) Reduced graphene oxide/InGaZn mixed oxide nanocomposite photocatalysts for hydrogen production. Chem Sus Chem 7(2):585–597.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201300685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martha S, Reddy KH, Parida KM (2014b) Fabrication of In2O3 modified ZnO for enhancing stability, optical behaviour, electronic properties and photocatalytic activity for hydrogen production under visible light. J Mater Chem A 2(10):3621–3631.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta14285jCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martha S, Reddy KH, Biswal N, Parida KM (2012a) Facile synthesis of InGaZn mixed oxide nanorods for enhanced hydrogen production under visible light. Dalton Trans 41(46):14107–14116.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2dt31949gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonnell KA, Wadnerkar N, English NJ, Rahman M, Dowling D (2013) Photo-active and optical properties of bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3): an experimental and theoretical study. Chem Phys Lett 572:78–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2013.04.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moitra D, Ghosh BK, Chandel M, Ghosh NN (2016) Synthesis of BiFeO3 nanowire- reduced graphene oxide based magnetically separable nanocatalyst and its versatile catalytic activity towards multiple organic reactions. RSC Adv 6(100):97941–97952.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA22077KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montazerozohori M, Habibi MH, Joohari S, Khodadostan V (2007) The effects of some operational parameters in photodegradation of benzylamine and aniline and their kinetics in aqueous suspension of Tio2 and Pt–loaded TiO2. Ann Chim 97(10):1015–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adic.200790086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nashim A, Martha S, Parida KM (2013) Gd2Ti2O7/In2O3: efficient visible-light-driven heterojunction-based composite photocatalysts for hydrogen production. Chem Cat Chem 5:2352–2359Google Scholar
  29. Nayak S, Mohapatra L, Parida K (2015) Visible light-driven novel g-C3N4/NiFe-LDH composite photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity towards water oxidation and reduction reaction. J Mater Chem A 36:18622–18635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nechache R, Harnagea C, Licoccia S, Traversa E, Ruediger A, Pignolet A, Rosei F (2011) Photovoltaic properties of Bi2FeCrO6 epitaxial thin films. Appl Phys Lett 98(20):202902.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3590270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patnaik S, Martha S, Madras G, Parida K (2016) The effect of sulfate pretreatment to improve the deposition of Au-nanoparticles in a gold-modified sulfated gC3N4 plasmonic photocatalyst towards visible light induced water reduction reaction. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18(41):28502–28514.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP04262GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng J, Hojamberdiev M, Cao B, Wang J, Xu Y (2011) Surfactant-free hydrothermal synthesis of submicron BiFeO3 powders. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 103(2):511–516.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-010-6024-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quinonez JLO, Dias D, Dbe IZ, Santamaria HA, Betancourt I, Jacinto PS, Etzana NN (2013) Easy synthesis of high-purity BiFeO3 nanoparticles:new insights derived from the structural, optical, and magnetic characterization. Inorg Chem 52(18):10306–10317.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ic400627cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rashad MM (2012) Effect of synthesis conditions on the preparation of BiFeO3 nanopowders using two different methods. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 23(4):882–888.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-011-0513-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reddy KH, Martha S, Parida KM (2013) Fabrication of novel p-BiOI/n-ZnTiO3 heterojunction for degradation of rhodamine 6G under visible light irradiation. Inorg Chem 52(11):6390–6401.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ic400159mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soltani T, Mohammad HE (2013) Sono-synthesis of bismuth ferrite nanoparticles with high photocatalytic activity in degradation of Rhodamine B under solar light irradiation. Chem Eng J 223:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soltani T, Entezari MH (2013a) Photolysis and photocatalysis of methylene blue by ferrite bismuth nanoparticles under sunlight irradiation. J Mol Catal A Chem 377:197–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2013.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soltani T, Entezari MH (2013b) Solar photocatalytic degradation of RB5 by ferrite bismuth nanoparticles synthesized via ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 20(5):1245–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsai CJ, Yang CY, Liao YC, Chueh YL (2012) Hydrothermally grown bismuth ferrites: controllable phases and morphologies in a mixed KOH/NaOH mineralizer. J Mater Chem 22(34):17432–17436.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm33859aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valant M, Axelsson AK, Alford N (2007) Peculiarities of a solid-state synthesis of multiferroic polycrystalline BiFeO3. Chem Mater 19(22):5431–5436.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm071730+CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang J, Neaton JB, Zheng H, Nagarajan V, Ogale SB, Liu B, Viehland D, Vaithyanathan V, Schlom DG, Waghmare UV, Spaldin NA, Rabe KM, Wuttig M, Ramesh R (2003) Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures. Science 299(5613):1719–1722.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang X, Lin Y, Ding XF, Jiang JG (2011) Enhanced visible light response photocatalytic activity of bismuth ferrite nanoparticles. J Alloys Comp 509(23):6585–6388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang YP, Zhou L, Zhang MF, Chen XY, Liu JM, Liu ZG (2004) Room temperature saturated ferroelectric polarization in BiFeO3 ceramics synthesized by rapid liquid phase sintering. Appl Phys Lett 84(10):1731–1733.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1667612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao Z, Zhang W, Sun Y, Yu J, Zhang Y, Wang H, Dong F, Wu Z (2016) Bi cocatalyst/Bi2MoO6 microspheres nanohybrid with SPR-promoted visible-light photocatalysis. J Phys Chem 120:11889–11898Google Scholar
  45. Zheng L, Zheng Y, Chen C, Zhan Y, Lin X, Zheng Q, Wei K, Zhu J (2009) Network structured SnO2/ZnO hetero junction nanocatalyst with high photocatalytic activity. J Inorg Chem 48(5):1819–1825.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ic802293pCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Nano Science and Nano Technology, ITERSiksha ‘O’ Anusandhan UniversityBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations