Advertisement

Amine functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for removal of oil droplets from produced water and accelerated magnetic separation

  • Saebom Ko
  • Eun Song Kim
  • Siman Park
  • Hugh Daigle
  • Thomas E. Milner
  • Chun Huh
  • Martin V. Bennetzen
  • Giuliano A. Geremia
Research Paper

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) with surface coatings designed for water treatment, in particular for targeted removal of contaminants from produced water in oil fields, have drawn considerable attention due to their environmental merit. The goal of this study was to develop an efficient method of removing very stable, micron-scale oil droplets dispersed in oilfield produced water. We synthesized MNPs in the laboratory with a prescribed surface coating. The MNPs were superparamagnetic magnetite, and the hydrodynamic size of amine functionalized MNPs ranges from 21 to 255 nm with an average size of 66 nm. The initial oil content of 0.25 wt.% was reduced by as much as 99.9% in separated water. The electrostatic attraction between negatively charged oil-in-water emulsions and positively charged MNPs controls, the attachment of MNPs to the droplet surface, and the subsequent aggregation of the electrically neutral oil droplets with attached MNPs (MNPs-oils) play a critical role in accelerated and efficient magnetic separation. The total magnetic separation time was dramatically reduced to as short as 1 s after MNPs, and oil droplets were mixed, in contrast with the case of free, individual MNPs with which separation took about 36∼72 h, depending on the MNP concentrations. Model calculations of magnetic separation velocity, accounting for the MNP magnetization and viscous drag, show that the total magnetic separation time will be approximately 5 min or less, when the size of the MNPs-oils is greater than 360 nm, which can be used as an optimum operating condition.

Keywords

Produced water treatment Oil removal Superparamagnetic nanoparticles Magnetic separation Aggregation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Qing Wang at Rice University for the discussions and help in synthesis and characterization of MNPs and Maersk Oil Management for permission to publish this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was funded by the Maersk Oil in Doha, Qatar, and the Nanoparticles for Subsurface Engineering Industrial Affiliates Program at the University of Texas at Austin (member companies: Baker-Hughes, Nissan Chemical, and Foundation CMG).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

(WMV 15471 kb)

References

  1. Amanullah M, Ramasamy J (2014) Nanotechnology can overcome the critical issues of extremely challenging drilling and production environments (SPE 171693). Paper presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 10–13 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold R et al (2004) Managing water–from waste to resource. Oilfield Rev 16:26–41Google Scholar
  3. Bagaria HG et al (2013) Stabilization of iron oxide nanoparticles in high sodium and calcium brine at high temperatures with adsorbed sulfonated copolymers. Langmuir 29:3195–3206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennetzen MV, Mogensen K (2014) Novel Applications of Nanoparticles for Future Enhanced Oil Recovery (IPTC 17857). Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10–12 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleceri L, Greenberg A, Eaton A (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  6. El-Diasty AI, Ragab AMS (2013) Applications of nanotechnology in the oil & gas industry: latest trends worldwide & future challenges in Egypt (SPE 164716). Paper presented at the North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Cairo, Egypt, 15–17 AprilGoogle Scholar
  7. Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DRA, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170:530–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fonnum G, Johansson C, Molteberg A, Mørup S, Aksnes E (2005) Characterisation of Dynabeads® by magnetization measurements and Mössbauer spectroscopy. J Magn Mag Mater 293:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregory KB, Vidic RD, Dzombak DA (2011) Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements 7:181–186. doi: 10.2113/gselements.7.3.181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta AK, Gupta M (2005) Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 26:3995–4021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Helland S, Goldszal A, Goud P (2008) Emerging issues in produced water management: Total EP Norge approach (SPE 111973). Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Nice, France, 15–17, AprilGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs T (2016) More oil, more water: how produced water will create big cost problems for shale operators. J Petrol Technol 68:34–39. doi: 10.2118/1216-0034-JPT
  13. Kapusta S, Balzano L, Te Riele PM (2011) Nanotechnology applications in oil and gas exploration and production (IPTC 15152). Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 15–17 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  14. Ko S, Huh C (2017) Use of nanoparticles for oil production applications. In: application of nano-geosciences in petroleum engineering. Springer Monograph, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  15. Ko S, Prigiobbe V, Huh C, Bryant SL, Bennetzen MV, Mogensen K (2014) Accelerated oil droplet separation from produced water using magnetic nanoparticles (SPE 170828). Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27–29 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  16. Ko S, Lee H, Huh C (2016) Efficient removal of EOR polymer from produced water using magnetic nanoparticles and regeneration/re-use of spent particles. SPE Prod Oper (accepted) doi: 10.2118/179576-PA
  17. Kong X, Ohadi M (2010) Applications of micro and nano technologies in the oil and gas industry—overview of the recent progress (SPE 138241). Paper presented at the Abu Dhabi international petroleum exhibition and conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 1–4 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnamoorti R (2006) Extracting the benefits of nanotechnology for the oil industry. J Petrol Technol 58:24–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhn SJ, Hallahan DE, Giorgio TD (2006) Characterization of superparamagnetic nanoparticle interactions with extracellular matrix in an in vitro system. Ann Biomed Eng 34:51–58. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-9004-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matteo C, Candido P, Vera R, Francesca V (2012) Current and future nanotech applications in the oil industry. Am J Appl Sci 9:784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mehta P, Huh C, Bryant SL (2014) Evaluation of superparamagnetic nanoparticle-based heating for flow assurance in subsea flowlines (IPTC 18090). Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10–12 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  22. Moeser GD, Roach KA, Green WH, Laibinis PE, Hatton TA (2002) Water-based magnetic fluids as extractants for synthetic organic compounds. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:4739–4749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mokhatab S, Fresky MA, Islam MR (2006) Applications of nanotechnology in oil and gas E&P. J Petrol Technol 58:48–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olsson G (2015) Water and energy: threats and opportunities, 2nd edn. International Water Association Publishing, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Plebon M (2006) De-oiling produced water from upstream operations without the need for added chemicals or heat. In: Water Innovation In The Oil Patch Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 6/21/06–6/22/06 2006Google Scholar
  26. Pourafshary P, Azimpour S, Motamedi P, Samet M, Taheri S, Bargozin H, Hendi S (2009) Priority assessment of investment in development of nanotechnology in upstream petroleum industry (SPE 126101). Paper presented at the SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, 9–11 MayGoogle Scholar
  27. Prigiobbe V, Ko S, Huh C, Bryant SL (2015a) Measuring and modeling the magnetic settling of superparamagnetic nanoparticle dispersions. J Colloid Interface Sci 447:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prigiobbe V, Ko S, Wang Q, Huh C, Bryant SL, Bennetzen MV (2015b) Magnetic nanoparticles for efficient removal of oilfield “Contaminants”: modeling of magnetic separation and validation (SPE 173786). Paper presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 13–15 AprilGoogle Scholar
  29. Rahmani AR, Bryant SL, Huh C, Ahmadian M, Zhang W, Liu QH (2015) Characterizing reservoir heterogeneities using magnetic nanoparticles (SPE-173195). Paper presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, TX, USA, 23–25 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  30. Ravaud R, Lemarquand G (2009) Magnetic field produced by a parallelepipedic magnet of various and uniform polarization. Prog Electromagn Res 98:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saggaf M (2008) A vision for future upstream technologies. J Petrol Technol 60:54–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tellez GT, Nirmalakhandan N, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2005) Comparison of purge and trap GC/MS and spectrophotometry for monitoring petroleum hydrocarbon degradation in oilfield produced waters. Microchem J 81:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Darrah TH, Kondash A (2014) A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48:8334–8348. doi: 10.1021/es405118y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vipulanandan C, Krishnamoorti R, Mohammed A, Boncan V, Narvaez G, Head B, Pappas J (2015) Iron nanoparticle modified smart cement for real time monitoring of ultra deepwater oil well cementing applications (OTC 25842). Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA, 04–07 MayGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang H et al (2013) Removal of oil droplets from contaminated water using magnetic carbon nanotubes. Water Res 47:4198–4205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang Q, Prigiobbe V, Huh C, Bryant SL, Mogensen K, Bennetzen MV (2014) Removal of divalent cations from brine using selective adsorption onto magnetic nanoparticles (IPTC 17901). Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Umpur, Malysia, 10–12 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang Q, Prigiobbe V, Huh C, Bryant SL, Bennetzen MV, Geremia G (2017) Effect of an electrolyte on adsorption of calcium onto superparamagnetic nanoparticles functionalized with polyacrylic acid (PAA). Energies Submitted Google Scholar
  38. Worthen A et al. (2015) Multi-scale evaluation of nanoparticle-stabilized CO2-in-water foams: from the benchtop to the field (SPE 175065). Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX USAGoogle Scholar
  39. WWAP UNWWAP (2015) The United Nations world water development report 2015: water for a sustainable world. http://www.unesco-ihe.org/sites/default/files/wwdr_2015.pdf. Accessed 02 Nov 2016
  40. Xue Z et al (2014) Effect of grafted copolymer composition on iron oxide nanoparticle stability and transport in porous media at high salinity. Energ Fuel 28:3655–3665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yavuz CT, Prakash A, Mayo J, Colvin VL (2009) Magnetic separations: from steel plants to biotechnology. Chem Eng Sci 64:2510–2521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yoon KY, Kotsmar C, Ingram DR, Huh C, Bryant SL, Milner TE, Johnston KP (2011) Stabilization of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoclusters in concentrated brine with cross-linked polymer shells. Langmuir 27:10962–10969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yoon KY et al (2012) Effect of adsorbed amphiphilic copolymers on the interfacial activity of superparamagnetic nanoclusters and the emulsification of oil in water. Macromolecules 45:5157–5166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Petroleum and Geosystems EngineeringUniversity of TexasAustinUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of TexasAustinUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of TexasAustinUSA
  4. 4.Maersk Oil CorporateKøbenhavnsområdetDenmark
  5. 5.Maersk Oil Research and Technology CentreDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations