Antimicrobial properties of graphene-like nanoparticles: coating effect on Staphylococcus aureus
- 358 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
The exploitation of nanomaterials with antimicrobial properties has attracted an ever-growing interest in the recent years. Carbon-based materials, such as graphene and graphene family materials (GFMs), have gained most of the attention for application in many biomedical fields. Here, we describe the antimicrobial activity of graphene-like (GL) layers derived from the chemical demolition of carbon black, against the planktonic growth of Staphylococcus aureus cells, primary cause of hospital and community-acquired infections, often leading to bacteremia and sepsis. The inhibitory capabilities of GL layers on the formation of S. aureus biofilm are also assessed. The antimicrobial properties seem based mainly on the interaction between GL layers and bacteria surfaces. FESEM and AFM analyses suggest that the GL layers coat the cells as soon as they get in contact with them, as also indicated by the wettability of the GLs.
Keywords
Graphene-like (GL) layers antimicrobial properties AFM Gram-positiveNotes
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by ATENEO 2013 to DU. FV thanks the National Flagship Project NANOMAX N-CHEM.
Supplementary material
References
- Alfè M, Gargiulo V, Di Capua R (2015) Tuning the surface morphology of self-assembled graphene-like thin films through pH variation. Appl Surf Sci 353:628–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alfè M, Gargiulo V, Di Capua R, Chiarella F, Rouzaud JN, Vergara A, Ciajolo A (2012) Wet chemical method for making graphene-like films from carbon black. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4491–4498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alfè M, Gargiulo V, Lisi L, Di Capua R (2014b) Synthesis and characterization of conductive copper-based metal-organic framework/graphene-like composites. Mater Chem Phys 147(3):744–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alfè M, Spasiano D, Gargiulo V, Vitiello G, Di Capua R, Marotta R (2014a) TiO2/graphene-like photocatalysts for selective oxidation of 3-pyridine-methanol to vitamin B3 under UV/solar simulatedradiation in aqueous solution at room conditions: the effect of morphology on catalyst performances. Appl Catal A-Genl 487:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ansari AM, Khan HM, Khan AA, Cameotra WS, Pal R (2013) Antibiofilm efficacy of silver nanoparticles against biofilm of extended spectrum β-lactamase isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Appl Nanosci 4(7):859–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Esfandiar A (2011) Wrapping bacteria by graphene nanosheets for isolation from environment, reactivation by sonication, and inactivation by near-infrared irradiation. J Phys Chem B 15:6279–6288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Akhavan O, Ghaderi E (2010) Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano 4:5731–5736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bao Q, Zhang D, Qi P (2011) Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticle and graphene oxide nanosheet composites as a bactericidal agent for water disinfection. J Colloid Interf Sci 360:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharya P, Du D, Lin Y (2014) Bioinspired nanoscale materials for biomedical and energy applications. J R Soc Interface 11:20131067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carpio MIE, Santos CM, Wei X, Rodrigues DF (2012) Toxicity of a polymer–graphene oxide composite against bacterial planktonic cells, biofilms, and mammalian cells. Nanoscale 4(15):4746–4756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chaibenjawong P, Foster SJ (2011) Desiccation tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Microbiol 193(2):125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Moraes AC, Lima BA, de Faria AF, Brocchi M, Alves OL (2015) Graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite as a promising biocidal agent against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Nanomedicine 10:6847–6861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15(2):167–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Epstein AK, Pokroy B, Seminara A, Aizenberg J (2011) Bacterial biofilm shows persistent resistance to liquid wetting and gas penetration. Publ Natl Acad Sci 108:995–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feng Y, Chen CJ, Su LH, Hu S, Yu J, Chiu CH (2008) Evolution and pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus: lessons learned from genotyping and comparative genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32(1):23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gargiulo V, Alfè M, Di Capua R, Togna AR, Cammisotto V, Fiorito S, Musto A, Navarra A, Parisi S, Pezzella A (2015) Supplementing π-systems: eumelanin and graphene-like integration towards high conductive material for mammalian cell culture bio-interface. J Mater Chem B 3:5070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gurunathan S, Han JW, Dayem AA, Eppakayala V, Kim JH (2012) Oxidative stress-mediated antibacterial activity of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Nanomedicine 7:5901–5914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hegaba HM, ElMekawyc A, Zoua L, Mulcahya D, Sainta CP, Ginic-Markovic M (2016) The controversial antibacterial activity of graphene-based materials. Carbon 105:362–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hu WB, Peng C, Luo WJ, Lv M, Li X, Li D, Huang Q, Fan C (2010) Graphene-based Antibacterical paper. ACS Nano 4:4317–4323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huh AJ, Kwon YJ (2011) “Nanoantibiotics”: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. J Control Release 156(2):128–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jastrzębska AM, Kurtycz P, Olszyna AR (2012) Recent advances in graphene family materials toxicity investigations. J Nanopart Res 14:1–21Google Scholar
- Jastrzębska AM, Olszyna AR (2015) The ecotoxicity of graphene family materials: current status, knowledge gaps and future needs. J Nanopart Res 17:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Wang G, Zhu H, Zhang M, Zheng X, Di Z, Liu X, Wang X (2014) Antibacterial activity of large-area monolayer graphene film manipulated by charge transfer. Sci Rep 4:4359Google Scholar
- Liu S, Zeng TH, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R, Kong J, Chen Y (2011) Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 5(9):6971–6980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu S, Hu Ming Z, Tingying H, Wu R, Jiang R, Wei J, Wang L, Kong J, Chen Y (2012) Lateral dimension-dependent antibacterial activity of graphene oxide sheets. Langmuir 28(33):12364–12372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mannoor MS, Tao H, Clayton JD, Sengupta A, Kaplan DL, Naik RR, Verma N, Omenetto FG, McAlpine MC (2012) Graphene-based wireless bacteria detection on tooth enamel. Nat Commun 3:763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nečas D, Klapetek P (2012) Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis. Cent Eur J Phys 10(1):181–188Google Scholar
- Olivi M, Zanni E, De Bellis G, Talora C, Sarto MS, Palleschi C, Flahaut E, Monthioux M, Rapino S, Uccelletti D, Fiorito S (2013) Inhibition of microbial growth by carbon nanotube networks. Nanoscale 5:9023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parra C, Dorta F, Jimenez E, Henríquez R, Ramírez C, Rojas R, Villalobos P (2015) A nanomolecular approach to decrease adhesion of biofouling-producing bacteria to graphene-coated material. J Nanobiotechnology 16:13–82Google Scholar
- Perreault F, de Faria AF, Nejati S, Elimelech M (2015) Antimicrobial properties of graphene oxide nanosheets: why size matters. ACS Nano 9:7226–7236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rizzo AKLY, Theek B, Storm G, Kiessling F, Lammers L (2013) Recent progress in nanomedicine: therapeutic, diagnostic and theranostic applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 24:1159–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salas EC, Sun Z, Luttge A, Tour JM (2010) Reduction of graphene oxide via bacterial respiration. ACS Nano 4:4852–4856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sakai H, Procop GW, Kobayashi N, Togawa D, Wilson DA, Borden L, Krebs V, Bauer TW (2004) Simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci in positive blood cultures by real-time PCR with two fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe sets. J Clin Microbiol 42(12):5739–5744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Santos CM, Tria MCR, Vergara RAMV, Ahmed F, Advincula RC, Rodrigues DF (2011) Antimicrobial graphene polymer (PVK-GO) nanocomposite films. Chem Comm 47(31):8892–8894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shi L, Günther S, Hübschmann T, Wick LY, Harms H, Müller S (2007) Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria. Cytom Part A 71(8):592–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taylor E, Webster TJ (2011) Reducing infections through nanotechnology and nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 6:1463–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tu Y, Lv M, Xiu P, Huynh T, Zhang M, Castelli M, Liu Z, Huang Q, Fan C, Fang H, Zhou R (2013) Destructive extraction of phospholipids from Escherichia coli membranes by graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 8:594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wu MC, Deokar AR, Liao JH, Shih PY, Ling YC (2013) Graphene-based photothermal agent for rapid and effective killing of bacteria. ACS Nano 7:1281–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang K, Li Y, Tan X, Peng R, Liu Z (2012) Behavior and toxicity of graphene and its functionalized derivatives in biological systems. Small 9(9–10):1492–1503Google Scholar
- Zanni E, Bracciale GMP, Broggi A, Santarelli ML, Sarto MS, Palleschi C, Uccelletti D (2012) Graphite nanoplatelets and Caenorhabditis elegans: insights from an in vivo model. Nano Lett 12(6):2740–2744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhu ZJ, Su M, Ma L, Liu DJ, Wang ZX (2013) Preparation of graphene oxide–silver nanoparticle nanohybrids with highly antibacterial capability. Talanta 117:449–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zu SZ, Han BH (2009) Aqueous dispersion of graphene sheets stabilized by Pluronic copolymers: formation of Supramolecular hydrogel. J Phys Chem C 113:13651–13657CrossRefGoogle Scholar