Translocation mechanism of C60 and C60 derivations across a cell membrane

  • Lijun LiangEmail author
  • Zhengzhong Kang
  • Jia-Wei ShenEmail author
Research Paper


Carbon-based nanoparticles (NPs) such as fullerenes and nanotubes have been extensively studied for drug delivery in recent years. The permeation process of fullerene and its derivative molecules through membrane is essential to the utilization of fullerene-based drug delivery system, but the mechanism and the dynamics of permeation through cell membrane are still unclear. In this study, coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations were performed to investigate the permeation process of functionalized fullerene molecules (ca. 0.72 nm) through the membrane. Our results show that single functionalized fullerene molecule in such nanoscale could permeate the lipid membrane in micro-second time scale. Pristine C60 molecules prefer to aggregate into several small clusters while C60OH15 molecules could aggregate into one big cluster to permeate through the lipid membrane. After permeation of C60 or its derivatives into membrane, all C60 and C60OH15 molecules disaggregated and monodispersed in the lipid membrane.

Graphical abstract


Nanoparticles Carbon materials Cytotoxicity Molecular dynamics simulation 


Compliance with ethical standards


This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 21503186, 21403049, and 21674032) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. LY14B030008).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11051_2016_3647_MOESM1_ESM.docx (42 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 42 kb)

(WMV 2771 kb)


(WMV 2755 kb)


  1. Allen TM, Cullis PR (2004) Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science 303:1818–1822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araghi H, Zabihi Z (2013a) Influence of impact angle on the interaction between Co 55 nanocluster and Cu (001) substrate: ionized cluster beam deposition. Comp Mater Sci 67:109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araghi H, Zabihi Z (2013b) Molecular dynamics simulation of microscopic processes in Co nanocluster impact onto Cu (001) substrate. Nucl Instrum Meth B 298:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bao G, Mitragotri S, Tong S (2013) Multifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery and molecular imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:253–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:3684–3690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianco A, Kostarelos K, Prato M (2005) Applications of carbon nanotubes in drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Biol 9:674–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond PJ, Holyoake J, Ivetac A, Khalid S, Sansom MSP (2007) Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins and peptides. J Struct Biol 157:593–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brigger I, Dubernet C, Couvreur P (2012) Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 64:24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunetti V, Bouchet LM, Strumia MC (2015) Nanoparticle-cored dendrimers: functional hybrid nanocomposites as a new platform for drug delivery systems. Nanoscale 7:3808–3816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cha C, Shin SR, Annabi N, Dokmeci MR, Khademhosseini A (2013) Carbon-based nanomaterials: multifunctional materials for biomedical engineering. ACS Nano 7:2891–2897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen I, Dubnau D (2004) DNA uptake during bacterial transformation. Nat Rev Microbio 2:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng R, Meng F, Deng C, Klok H-A, Zhong Z (2013) Dual and multi-stimuli responsive polymeric nanoparticles for programmed site-specific drug delivery. Biomaterials 34:3647–3657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeVane R, Jusufi A, Shinoda W, C-c C, Nielsen SO, Moore PB, Klein ML (2010) Parametrization and application of a coarse grained force field for benzene/fullerene interactions with lipids. J Phys Chem B 114:16364–16372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dicheva BM, ten Hagen TLM, Seynhaeve ALB, Amin M, Eggermont AMM, Koning GA (2015) Enhanced specificity and drug delivery in tumors by cRGD-anchoring thermosensitive liposomes. Pharm Res 32:3862–3876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eslami H, Müller-Plathe F (2013) How thick is the interphase in an ultrathin polymer film? Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of polyamide-6, 6 on graphene. J Phys Chem C 117:5249–5257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eslami H, Jaafari B, Mehdipour N (2013) Coarse grained molecular dynamics simulation of nanoconfined water. Chem Phys Chem 14:1063–1070Google Scholar
  17. Felice B, Prabhakaran MP, Rodríguez AP, Ramakrishna S (2014) Drug delivery vehicles on a nano-engineering perspective. Mater Sci Eng: C 41:178–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng S-S (2014) Nanoparticles of biodegradable polymers for new-concept chemotherapy. Expert Rev Med DevicGoogle Scholar
  19. Giménez C et al (2015) Gated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the controlled delivery of drugs in cancer cells. Langmuir 31:3753–3762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hess B, Kutzner C, Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem Theo Comput 4:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hörmann K, Zimmer A (2016) Drug delivery and drug targeting with parenteral lipid nanoemulsions—a review. J Controll Release 223:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inui N, Mochiji K, Moritani K, Nakashima N (2010) Molecular dynamics simulations of nanopore processing in a graphene sheet by using gas cluster ion beam. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 98:787–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jia G et al (2005) Cytotoxicity of carbon nanomaterials: single-wall nanotube, multi-wall nanotube, and fullerene. Environ Sci Technol 39:1378–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnstone TC, Suntharalingam K, Lippard SJ (2016) The next generation of platinum drugs: targeted Pt (II) agents, nanoparticle delivery, and Pt (IV) prodrugs. Chem Rev 116:3436–3486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J, Farokhzad OC (2016) Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem Rev 116:2602–2663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang JW, Choi KS, Kang JC, Kang ES, Byun KR, Hwang HJ (2001) Cluster deposition study by molecular dynamics simulation: Al and Cu cluster. J Vac Sci Technol A 19:1902–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kotyk A (2012) Cell membrane transport: principles and techniques. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Kreuter J (2014) Drug delivery to the central nervous system by polymeric nanoparticles: what do we know? Adv Drug Deliv Rev 71:2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee SJ, Jeong Y-I, Park H-K, Kang DH, Oh J-S, Lee S-G, Lee HC (2015) Enzyme-responsive doxorubicin release from dendrimer nanoparticles for anticancer drug delivery. Int J Nanomedicine 10:5489Google Scholar
  30. Li L, Davande H, Bedrov D, Smith GD (2007) A molecular dynamics simulation study of C60 fullerenes inside a dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine lipid bilayer. J Phys Chem B 111:4067–4072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang L, Kong Z, Kang Z, Wang H, Zhang L, Shen J-W (2016) Theoretical evaluation on potential cytotoxicity of graphene quantum dots. ACS Biomater-Sci Eng. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00390 Google Scholar
  32. Lim D-J, Sim M, Oh L, Lim K, Park H (2014) Carbon-based drug delivery carriers for cancer therapy. Arch Pharm Res 37:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu Z, Chen K, Davis C, Sherlock S, Cao Q, Chen X, Dai H (2008) Drug delivery with carbon nanotubes for in vivo cancer treatment. Canc Res 68:6652–6660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marrink SJ, De Vries AH, Mark AE (2004) Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations. J Phys Chem B 108:750–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marrink SJ, Risselada J, Mark AE (2005) Simulation of gel phase formation and melting in lipid bilayers using a coarse grained model. Chem Phys Lipid 135:223–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marrink SJ, Risselada HJ, Yefimov S, Tieleman DP, De Vries AH (2007) The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 111:7812–7824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mehdipour N, Bahri K (2013) Mesoscale simulation of water. J Iran Chem Soc 10:1123–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mekaru H, Lu J, Tamanoi F (2015) Development of mesoporous silica-based nanoparticles with controlled release capability for cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 95:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Montellano A, Da Ros T, Bianco A, Prato M (2011) Fullerene C 60 as a multifunctional system for drug and gene delivery. Nanoscale 3:4035–4041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Monticelli L (2012) On atomistic and coarse-grained models for C60 fullerene. J. Chem Theo Comput 8:1370–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Monticelli L, Kandasamy SK, Periole X, Larson RG, Tieleman DP, Marrink S-J (2008) The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: extension to proteins. J. Chem Theo Comput 4:819–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Munoz F, Alici G, Li W (2014) A review of drug delivery systems for capsule endoscopy. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 71:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P (2013) Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nature Mater 12:991–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Natarajan JV, Nugraha C, Ng XW, Venkatraman S (2014) Sustained-release from nanocarriers: a review. J Control Release 193:122–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pattni BS, Chupin VV, Torchilin VP (2015) New developments in liposomal drug delivery. Chem Rev 115:10938–10966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Periole X, Cavalli M, Marrink S-J, Ceruso MA (2009) Combining an elastic network with a coarse-grained molecular force field: structure, dynamics, and intermolecular recognition. J Chem Theo Comput 5:2531–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Probst CE, Zrazhevskiy P, Bagalkot V, Gao X (2013) Quantum dots as a platform for nanoparticle drug delivery vehicle design. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Qiao R, Roberts AP, Mount AS, Klaine SJ, Ke PC (2007) Translocation of C60 and its derivatives across a lipid bilayer. Nano Lett 7:614–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raza K et al (2015) C 60-fullerenes for delivery of docetaxel to breast cancer cells: a promising approach for enhanced efficacy and better pharmacokinetic profile. Int J Pharma 495:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Risselada HJ, Marrink SJ (2008) The molecular face of lipid rafts in model membranes. Proc. Nat Acad Sci 105:17367–17372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rossi G, Barnoud J, Monticelli L (2013) Partitioning and solubility of C60 fullerene in lipid membranes. Phys Scr 87:058503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saunders MG, Voth GA (2013) Coarse-graining methods for computational biology. Annu Rev Biophys 42:73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shi J et al (2013) PEI-derivatized fullerene drug delivery using folate as a homing device targeting to tumor. Biomaterials 34:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shimizu K, Kubota R, Kobayashi N, Tahara M, Sugimoto N, Nishimura T, Ikarashi Y (2013) Cytotoxic effects of hydroxylated fullerenes in three types of liver cells. Materials 6:2713–2722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sridhar A, Srikanth B, Kumar A, Dasmahapatra AK (2015) Coarse-grain molecular dynamics study of fullerene transport across a cell membrane. J Chem Phys 143:024907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sultana S, Khan MR, Kumar M, Kumar S, Ali M (2013) Nanoparticles-mediated drug delivery approaches for cancer targeting: a review. J Drug Target 21:107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sundar S, Kundu J, Kundu SC (2016) Biopolymeric nanoparticles. Sci. Technol. Adv. MaterGoogle Scholar
  58. Thakare VS, Prendergast DA, Pastorin G, Jain S (2015) Carbon-based nanomaterials for targeted drug delivery and imaging. In: Targeted drug delivery: concepts and design. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 615–645Google Scholar
  59. Trpkovic A, Todorovic-Markovic B, Trajkovic V (2012) Toxicity of pristine versus functionalized fullerenes: mechanisms of cell damage and the role of oxidative stress. Arch Toxicol 86:1809–1827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC (2012) Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annu Rev Med 63:185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilczewska AZ, Niemirowicz K, Markiewicz KH, Car H (2012) Nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Pharmacol Rep 64:1020–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wong BS, Yoong SL, Jagusiak A, Panczyk T, Ho HK, Ang WH, Pastorin G (2013) Carbon nanotubes for delivery of small molecule drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:1964–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wong-Ekkabut J, Baoukina S, Triampo W, Tang IM, Tieleman DP, Monticelli L (2008) Computer simulation study of fullerene translocation through lipid membranes. Nat Nanotechnol 3:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xing G et al (2004) Influences of structural properties on stability of fullerenols. J Phys Chem B 108:11473–11479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yin Q, Shen J, Zhang Z, Yu H, Li Y (2013) Reversal of multidrug resistance by stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems for therapy of tumor. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:1699–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yun Y, Cho YW, Park K (2013) Nanoparticles for oral delivery: targeted nanoparticles with peptidic ligands for oral protein delivery. Adv Drug Delive Rev 65:822–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zabihi Z, Araghi H (2015) Formation of nanopore in a suspended graphene sheet with argon cluster bombardment: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Nucl Instrum Meth B 343:48–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang S, Chu Z, Yin C, Zhang C, Lin G, Li Q (2013a) Controllable drug release and simultaneously carrier decomposition of SiO2-drug composite nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 135:5709–5716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang Y, Chan HF, Leong KW (2013b) Advanced materials and processing for drug delivery: the past and the future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:104–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life Information Science and Instrument EngineeringHangzhou Dianzi UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical Chemistry and BiologyRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.School of MedicineHangzhou Normal UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations