Generation of copper, nickel, and CuNi alloy nanoparticles by spark discharge

  • Alex MunteanEmail author
  • Moritz Wagner
  • Jörg Meyer
  • Martin Seipenbusch
Research Paper


The generation of copper, nickel, and copper-nickel alloy nanoparticles by spark discharge was studied, using different bespoke alloy feedstocks. Roughly spherical particles with a primary particle Feret diameter of 2–10 nm were produced and collected in agglomerate form. The copper-to-nickel ratios determined by Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and therefore averaged over a large number of particles, matched the nominal copper content quite well. Further investigations showed that the electrode compositions influenced the evaporation rate and the primary particle size. The evaporation rate decreased with increasing copper content, which was found to be in good accordance with the Llewellyn-Jones model. However, the particle diameter was increasing with an increasing copper content, caused by a decrease in melting temperature due to the lower melting point of copper. Furthermore, the alloy compositions on the nanoscale were investigated via EDX. The nanoparticles exhibited almost the same composition as the used alloy feedstock, with a deviation of less than 7 percentage points. Therefore, no segregation could be detected, indicating the presence of a true alloy even on the nanoscale.


Nanoparticles Spark discharge Aerosol Copper Nickel Alloy 



The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Gábor Galbács from the University of Szeged/Hungary for the ICP-MS measurements and to PD Dr. rer. nat. habil. Reinhard Schneider from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) for the EDX measurements.


The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement No. 280765 (BUONAPART-E).


  1. Best RJ, Russell WW (1954) Nickel, copper and some of their alloys as catalysts for ethylene hydrogenation. J Am Chem Soc 76(3):838–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biskos G, Vons V, Yurteri CU, Schmidt-Ott A (2008) Generation and sizing of particles for aerosol-based nanotechnology. KONA Powder and Part J Issue 26:13–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandes EA, Brook GB (1992) Smithells metals reference book, 7th edn. Butterworth & Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Byeon JH, Park JH, Hwang J (2008) Spark generation of monometallic and bimetallic aerosol nanoparticles. J Aerosol Sci 39(10):888–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen H et al (2004) Carbon dioxide reforming of methane reaction catalyzed by stable nickel copper catalysts. Catal Today Issue 97:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Helsper C et al (1993) Investigations of a new aerosol generator for the production of carbon aggregate particles. Atmos Environ Part A 27(8):1271–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirakawa K, Toshima N (2003) Ag/Rh bimetallic nanoparticles formed by self-assembly from ag and rh monometallic nanoparticles in solution. Chem Lett 32(1):78–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkins NT, Eagar TW (2003) Submicron particle chemistry: vapor condensation analogous to liquid solidification. J Miner Met Mater Soc 55(6):44–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenkins WD, Digges TG, Johnson CR (1957) Tensile properties of copper, nickel, and 70-percent-copper—30-percent-nickel and 30-percent-copper—70-percent-nickel alloys at high temperatures. J Res Nation Bur Stand 58(4):201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim J-T, Chang J-S (2005) Generation of metal oxide aerosol particles by a pulsed spark discharge technique. J Electrostat 63(6–10):911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Llewellyn-Jones F (1950) Electrode erosion by spark discharges. Br J Appl Phys 1(3):60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Llewellyn-Jones F (1963) The Mechanism of Electrode Erosion in Electrical Discharges. Platin Met Rev 2(7):58–65Google Scholar
  13. Mäkelä JM, Aalto P, Gorbunov BZ, Korhonen P (1992) Size distributions from aerosol spark generator. J Aerosol Sci 23(1):233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Messing ME, Dick KA, Wallenberg LR, Deppert K (2009) Generation of size-selected gold nanoparticles by spark discharge—for growth of epitaxial nanowires. Gold Bulletin 42(1):20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pál E et al (2012) Composition-dependent sintering behaviour of chemically synthesised CuNi nanoparticles and their application in aerosol printing for preparation of conductive microstructures. Colloid Polym Sci 290:941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paschen H et al (2004) Nanotechnologie - Forschung, Entwicklung, Anwendung. Springer Verlag, Berlin, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  17. Peineke C, Attoui MB, Schmidt-Ott A (2006) Using a glowing wire generator for production of charged, uniformly sized nanoparticles at high concentrations. J Aerosol Sci 37(12):1651–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pratsinis SE (1998) Flame Aerosol Synthesis of Ceramic Powders. Prog Energy Combust Sci 24(3):197–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reinmann R, Akram M (1997) Temporal investigation of a fast spark discharge in chemically inert gases. J Phys D Appl Phys 30(7):1125–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwyn S, Garwin E, Schmidt-Ott A (1988) Aerosol Generation by Spark Discharge. J Aerosol Sci 19(5):639–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seipenbusch M, Weber AP, Schiel A, Kasper G (2003) Influence of the gas atmosphere on restructuring and sintering kinetics of nickel and platinum aerosol nanoparticle agglomerates. J Aerosol Sci 34(12):1699–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strasheim A, Blum F (1975) A study of sparked aluminium samples with a scanning electron microscope and energy-dispersive X-ray analyser. Spectrochim Acta Part B 30(4):147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Szente RN, Munz RJ, Drouet MG (1994) Copper-niobium and copper-tungsten composites as plasma torch cathodes. J Phys D Appl Phys 27(7):1443–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tabrizi NS et al (2009a) Generation of nanoparticles by spark discharge. J Nanopart Res 11:315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tabrizi NS et al (2009b) Synthesis of mixed metallic nanoparticles by spark discharge. J Nanopart Res 11:1209–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tabrizi NS, Xu Q, van der Pers NM, Schmidt-Ott A (2010) Generation of mixed metallic nanoparticles from immiscible metals by spark discharge. J Nanopart Res 12(1):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ullmann M, Friedlander SK, Schmidt-Ott A (2002) Nanoparticle formation by laser ablation. J Nanopart Res 4(6):499–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van der Horst RM, Verreycken T, van Veldhuizen EM, Bruggeman PJ (2012) Time-resolved optical emission spectroscopy of nanosecond pulsed discharges in atmospheric-pressure N2 and N2/H2O mixtures. J Phys D Appl Phys 45(34):1–11Google Scholar
  29. Vons VA et al (2011) Silicon nanoparticles produced by spark discharge. J Nanopart Res 13(10):4867–4879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weber AP, Seipenbusch M, Kasper G (2003) Size effects in the catalytic activity of unsupported metallic nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 5(3):293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Chemical Process EngineeringUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Mechanical Process Engineering and MechanicsKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations