Molecular adsorption of NO on free-standing and on graphene-supported Mo3W5 cluster: a density functional theory investigation

Research Paper

Abstract

The adsorption of molecular NO on the free-standing and graphene-supported Mo3W5 cluster is studied using methods from the gradient-corrected density functional theory. Before, the effect of the graphene support on the properties of the metal cluster was investigated. The interaction between the metal cluster and the graphene sheet takes place mainly through W atoms, which form up to three bonds with the support. Interaction energies are in the range from 0.6 to 1.5 eV. An amount of charge of about 0.4–0.5 e\(^-\) is transferred from the cluster to the support. Geometric distortions in the metal aggregate are negligible. An important decrease in the magnetic moment of Mo3W5 with respect to its free-standing value is observed after the interaction with the support. Molecular NO adsorbs on sites involving W atoms only, both for the free-standing and the supported metal cluster. Adsorption energies are in a range from 2 to 4 eV. A parallel mode is the preferred mode from an energetic point of view. Moreover, for that parallel adsorption mode, the N–O bond is more effectively activated. Magnetic moments change largely after adsorption indicating important rearrangement in the electronic configuration of the metal cluster. An important amount of electronic charge is transferred both from the free-standing and from the supported metal cluster to NO. The amount of charge transferred seems to be closely related to the activation of the N–O bond. The effect of the graphene sheet on the catalytic properties of Mo3W5 seems to be negligible, with the exception of some changes in the electronic configuration of the cluster.

Keywords

Density functional theory MoW clusters Graphene support Nitric oxide Modeling and simulation 

References

  1. Anderson ML, Ford MS, Derrik PJ, Drewello T, Woodruff DP, Mackenzie SR (2006) Nitric oxide decomposition on small rhodium clusters, Rhn +/-. J Phys Chem A 110:10992–11000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown WA, King DA (2000) NO chemisorption and reactions on metal surfaces: a new perspective. J Phys Chem B 104:2578–2578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fan X, Zhang G, Zhang F (2015) Multiple roles of graphene in heterogeneous catalysis. Chem Soc Rev 44:3023–3035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fogueri UR, Kozuch S, Karton A, Martin JM (2013) A simple DFT-based diagnostic for nondynamical correlation. Theor Chem Acc 132:1291–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford MS, Anderson ML, Barrow MP, Woodruff DP, Drewello T, Derrick PJ, Mackenzie SR (2005) Reactions of nitric oxide on Rh+ 6 clusters: abundant chemistry and evidence of structural isomers. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harding D, Mackenzie SR, Walsh TR (2006) Structural isomers and reactivity for Rh6 and Rh+ 6. J Phys Chem B 110(18):272Google Scholar
  7. Huber KP, Herzberg G (1979) Molecular spectra and molecular structure. IV. Constants of diatomic molecules, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, BerkshireCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Julkapli NM, Bagheri S (2015) Graphene supported heterogeneous catalysts: an overview. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:948–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kazusaka A, Howe RF (1980) Interaction of nitric oxide with supported chromium, molybdenum, and tungsten catalysts. J Catal 63:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim G, Kawazoe Y, Lee KR (2012) Controlled catalytic properties of platinum clusters on strained graphene. J Phys Chem Lett 3:1989–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kleinman L, Bylander DM (1982) Efficacious form for model pseudopotentials. Phys Rev Lett 48:1425–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kong XK, Chen CL, Chen QW (2014) Doped graphene for metal-free catalysis. Chem Soc Rev 43:2841–2857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mulliken RS (1955) Electronic population analysis on LCAOMO molecular wave functions. J Chem Phys 23:1833–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parr RG, Yang W (1989) Density Functional theory of atoms and molecules. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pis-Diez R, Aguilera-Granja F (2013) Structural stability, chemical order and reactivity pattern of Mop W q clusters, with p + q = 8. Eur Phys J D 67:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Soler JM, Artacho E, Gale JD, García A, Junquera J, Ordejón P, Sánchez-Portal D (2002) The SIESTA method for ab initio order- N materials simulation. J Phys 14:2745–2779Google Scholar
  18. Topsøe H, Clausen BS, Massoth FE (1996) Hydrotreating catalysis. In: Anderson JR, Boudart M (eds) Catalysis, catalysis-science and technology, vol 11. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p 1Google Scholar
  19. Torres MB, Aguilera-Granja F, Balbás LC, Vega A (2011) Ab initio study of the adsorption of NO on the Rh+ 6 cluster. J Phys Chem A 115:8350–8360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Troullier N, Martins JL (1991) Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations. Phys Rev B 43:1993–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang HT, Feng Q, Cheng YC, Yao YB, Wang QX, Li K, Schwingenschogl U, Zhang XX, Yang W (2013) Atomic bonding between metal and graphene. J Phys Chem C 117:4632–4638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu MC, Goodman DW (1994) Particulate Cu on ordered Al2O3: reactions with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. J Phys Chem 98:9874–9881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu X, Goodman DW (1994) The effect of particle size on nitric oxide decomposition and reaction with carbon monoxide on palladium catalysts. Catal Lett 24:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu X, Chen P, Goodman DW (1994) A comparative study of the coadsorption of carbon monoxide and nitric oxide on Pd(100), Pd(111), and silica-supported palladium particles with infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy. J Phys Chem 98:9242–9246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhou MA, Zhang AH, Dai ZX, Feng YP, Zhang C (2010) Strain-enhanced stabilization and catalytic activity of metal nanoclusters on graphene. J Phys Chem C 114(16):16541–16546CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Física “Manuel Sandoval Vallarta”Universidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíSLPMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias ExactasCEQUINOR, Centro de Química Inorgánica (CONICET, UNLP)La PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations