Size-dependent properties of silica nanoparticles for Pickering stabilization of emulsions and foams
- 1.6k Downloads
Nanoparticles are a promising alternative to surfactants to stabilize emulsions or foams in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes due to their effectiveness in very harsh environments found in many of the oilfields around the world. While the size-dependent properties of nanoparticles have been extensively studied in the area of optics or cellular uptake, little is known on the effects of nanoparticle size on emulsion/foam generation, especially for EOR applications. In this study, silica nanoparticles with four different sizes (5, 12, 25, and 80 nm nominal diameter) but with the same surface treatment were employed to test their emulsion or foam generation behavior in high-salinity conditions. The decane-in-brine emulsion generated by sonication or flowing through sandpack showed smaller droplet size and higher apparent viscosity as the nanoparticle size decreased. Similarly, the CO2-in-brine foam generation in sandstone or sandpacks was also significantly affected by the nanoparticle size, exhibiting higher apparent foam viscosity as the nanoparticle size decreased. In case of foam generation in sandstone cores with 5 nm nanoparticles, a noticeable hysteresis occurred when the flow velocity was initially increased and then decreased, implying a strong foam generation initially; and then the trapping of the generated foam in the rock pores, as the flow velocity decreased. On the other hand, weak foams stabilized with larger nanoparticles indicated a rapid coalescence of bubbles which prevented foam generation. Overall, stable emulsions/foams were achievable by the smaller particles as a result of greater diffusivity and/or higher number concentration, thus allowing more nanoparticles with higher surface area to volume ratio to be adsorbed at the fluid/fluid interfaces of the emulsion/foam dispersion.
KeywordsNanoparticles Size Interface Emulsion CO2 foam
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Nanoparticles for Subsurface Engineering IAP at the University of Texas at Austin (member companies: Baker-Hughes, Maersk, Nissan Chemical, PetroBras, Wintershall), and the donation of silica nanoparticles from Nissan Chemical America Corp.
- Gabel ST (2014) Generation, stability, and transport of nanoparticle-stabilized oil-in-water emulsions in porous media. Dissertation, The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
- Kibodeaux KR (1997) Experimental and theoretical studies of foam mechanisms in enhanced oil recovery and matrix acidization applications. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
- Kibodeaux K, Rossen W (1997) Coreflood study of surfactant-alternating-gas foam processes: implications for field design. In: SPE Western Regional Meeting, 1997. Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez Pin E, Roberts M, Yu H, Huh C, Bryant SL (2009) Enhanced migration of surface-treated nanoparticles in sedimentary rocks. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 2009. Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
- Singh R, Mohanty KK (2014) Foams stabilized by in-situ surface activated nanoparticles in bulk and porous media. In: Paper presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, SPE 170942Google Scholar
- Singh R, Mohanty KK (2015) Synergy between nanoparticles and surfactants in stabilizing foams for oil recovery. Energy Fuel 29:467–479Google Scholar
- Veedu FK et al. (2015) EOR feasibility study through an integrated laboratory evaluation and reservoir simulation for a large carbonate field in Kuwait. In: SPE reservoir simulation symposium, 2015. Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
- Worthen AJ, Tran V, Cornell KA, Truskett TM, Johnston KP (2016) Steric stabilization of nanoparticles with grafted low molecular weight ligands in highly concentrated brines including divalent ions. Soft Matter 12:2025–2039Google Scholar
- Zhang T, Davidson D, Bryant SL, Huh C (2010) Nanoparticle-stabilized emulsions for applications in enhanced oil recovery. In: Paper presented at the SPE improved oil recovery symposium, SPE 129885Google Scholar