Silica nanoparticles induce multinucleation through activation of PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β pathway and downregulation of chromosomal passenger proteins in L-02 cells

  • Weijia Geng
  • Yang Li
  • Yongbo Yu
  • Yang Yu
  • Junchao Duan
  • Lizhen Jiang
  • Qiuling Li
  • Zhiwei Sun
Research Paper

Abstract

Silica nanoparticles (SNPs) are applicable in various fields due to their unique physicochemical characteristics. However, concerns over their potential adverse effects have been raised. In our previous studies, we reported that SNPs could induce abnormal high incidence of multinucleation. The aim of this study is to further investigate the mechanisms of multinucleation induced by SNPs (68 nm) in human normal liver L-02 cells (L-02 cells). In order to determine the cytotoxicity of SNPs, MTT assay was performed, and the cell viability was decreased in a dose-dependent manner. The intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) detected by flow cytometry and multinucleation observed by Giemsa stain showed that ROS generation and rate of multinucleated cells increased after SNPs exposure. N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), a glutathione precursor against SNP-induced toxicity, was used as a ROS inhibitor to elucidate the relationship between ROS and multinucleation. The presence of NAC resulted in inhibition of both ROS generation and rate of multinucleation. Moreover, Western blot analysis showed that the protein levels of Cdc20, Aurora B, and Survivin were down-regulated, and the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β pathway was activated by SNPs. In conclusion, our findings strongly suggested that multinucleation induced by SNPs was related to PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β signal pathway activation and downregulation of G2/M phase-related protein and chromosomal passenger proteins.

Keywords

Silica nanoparticles Multinucleation Reactive oxygen species Chromosomal passenger proteins PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β pathway Toxicology Health effects 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81172704, No. 81230065), Special Project of Beijing Municipal Science&Technology Commission (Z131102002813060), and Project of Key Laboratory of Beijing for Toxicology.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

References

  1. Apopa PL, Qian Y, Shao R, Guo NL, Schwegler-Berry D, Pacurari M, Porter D, Shi X, Vallyathan V, Castranova V, Flynn DC (2009) Iron oxide nanoparticles induce human microvascular endothelial cell permeability through reactive oxygen species production and microtubule remodeling. Part Fibre Toxicol. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-6-1 Google Scholar
  2. Athinarayanan J, Periasamy VS, Alsaif MA, Al-Warthan AA, Alshatwi AA (2014) Presence of nanosilica (E551) in commercial food products: TNF-mediated oxidative stress and altered cell cycle progression in human lung fibroblast cells. Cell Biol Toxicol 30(2):89–100. doi: 10.1007/s10565-014-9271-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buttrick GJ, Wakefield JG (2008) PI3-K and GSK-3: Akt-ing together with microtubules. Cell Cycle 7(17):2621–2625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmena M, Wheelock M, Funabiki H, Earnshaw WC (2012) The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13(12):789–803. doi: 10.1038/nrm3474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carvalho A, Carmena M, Sambade C, Earnshaw WC, Wheatley SP (2003) Survivin is required for stable checkpoint activation in taxol-treated HeLa cells. J Cell Sci 116(Pt 14):2987–2998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chae S, Yun C, Um H, Lee JH, Cho H (2005) Centrosome amplification and multinuclear phenotypes are induced by hydrogen peroxide. Exp Mol Med 37(5):482–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clubb FJ Jr, Bishop SP (1984) Formation of binucleated myocardial cells in the neonatal rat. An index for growth hypertrophy. Lab Invest 50(5):571–577Google Scholar
  8. Dekkers S, Krystek P, Peters RJ, Lankveld DP, Bokkers BG, van Hoeven-Arentzen PH, Bouwmeester H, Oomen AG (2011) Presence and risks of nanosilica in food products. Nanotoxicology 5(3):393–405. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2010.519836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Díaz-Martínez LA, Clarke DJ (2009) Chromosome cohesion and the spindle checkpoint. Cell Cycle 8(17):2733–2740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duan J, Yu Y, Li Y, Yu Y, Li Y, Zhou X, Huang P, Sun Z (2013) Toxic effect of silica nanoparticles on endothelial cells through DNA damage response via Chk1-dependent G2/M checkpoint. PLoS One 8(4):e62087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geys J, De Vos R, Nemery B, Hoet PH (2009) In vitro translocation of quantum dots and influence of oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 297(5):L903–L911. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00029.2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonzalez L, Thomassen LC, Plas G, Rabolli V, Napierska D, Decordier I, Roelants M, Hoet PH, Kirschhock CE, Martens JA, Lison D, Kirsch-Volders M (2010) Exploring the aneugenic and clastogenic potential in the nanosize range: A549 human lung carcinoma cells and amorphous monodisperse silica nanoparticles as models. Nanotoxicology 4:382–395. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2010.501913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halamoda Kenzaoui B, Chapuis Bernasconi C, Guney-Ayra S, Juillerat-Jeanneret L (2012) Induction of oxidative stress, lysosome activation and autophagy by nanoparticles in human brain-derived endothelial cells. Biochem J 441(3):813–821. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanagata N, Zhuang F, Connolly S, Li J, Ogawa N, Xu M (2012) Molecular responses of human lung epithelial cells to the toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles inferred from whole genome expression analysis. ACS Nano 5(12):9326–9338. doi: 10.1021/nn202966t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayashi MT, Karlseder J (2013) DNA damage associated with mitosis and cytokinesis failure. Oncogene 32(39):4593–4601. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holt BD, Short PA, Rape AD, Wang YL, Islam MF, Dahl KN (2010) Carbon nanotubes reorganize actin structures in cells and ex vivo. ACS Nano 4(8):4872–4878. doi: 10.1021/nn101151x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horváth L, Magrez A, Golberg D, Zhi C, Bando Y, Smajda R, Horváth E, Forró L, Schwaller B (2011) In vitro investigation of the cellular toxicity of boron nitride nanotubes. ACS Nano 5(5):3800–3810. doi: 10.1021/nn200139h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang S, Chueh PJ, Lin YW, Shih TS, Chuang SM (2009) Disturbed mitotic progression and genome segregation are involved in cell transformation mediated by nano-TiO2 long-term exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 241(2):182–194. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang X, Teng X, Chen D, Tang F, He J (2010) The effect of the shape of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on cellular uptake and cell function. Biomaterials 31(3):438–448. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang J, Oberdörster G, Biswas P (2009) Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res 11(1):77–89. doi: 10.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kops GJ, Shah JV (2012) Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint. Chromosoma 121(5):509–525. doi: 10.1007/s00412-012-0378-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lancaster OM, Baum B (2014) Shaping up to divide: coordinating actin and microtubule cytoskeletal remodelling during mitosis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 34:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Y, Sun L, Jin M, Du Z, Liu X, Guo C, Li Y, Huang P, Sun Z (2011) Size-dependent cytotoxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Toxicol Vitro 25(7):1343–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li Y, Jing L, Yu Y, Yu Y, Duan J, Yang M, Geng W, Jiang L, Li Q, Sun Z (2014) Cytoskeleton and chromosome damage leading to abnormal mitosis were involved in multinucleated cells induced by silicon nanoparticles. Part Part Syst Char. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201400180 Google Scholar
  25. Liu X, Sun J (2010) Endothelial cells dysfunction induced by silica nanoparticles through oxidative stress via JNK/P53 and NF-kappaB pathways. Biomaterials 31(32):8198–8209. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Magrez A, Horváth L, Smajda R, Salicio V, Pasquier N, Forró L, Schwaller B (2009) Cellular toxicity of TiO2-based nanofilaments. ACS Nano 3(8):2274–2280. doi: 10.1021/nn9002067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manke A, Wang L, Rojanasakul Y (2013) Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity. Biomed Res Int 2013:942916. doi: 10.1155/2013/942916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nabeshi H, Yoshikawa T, Matsuyama K, Nakazato Y, Tochigi S, Kondoh S, Hirai T, Akase T, Nagano K, Abe Y, Yoshioka Y, Kamada H, Itoh N, Tsunoda S, Tsutsumi Y (2011) Amorphous nanosilica induce endocytosis-dependent ROS generation and DNA damage in human keratinocytes. Part Fibre Toxicol. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-8-1 Google Scholar
  29. Napierska D, Thomassen LC, Lison D, Martens JA, Hoet PH (2010) The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity. Part Fibre Toxicol 7(1):39. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-7-39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311(5761):622–627. doi: 10.1126/science.1114397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roesslein M, Hirsch C, Kaiser JP, Krug HF, Wick P (2013) Comparability of in vitro tests for bioactive nanoparticles: a common assay to detect reactive oxygen species as an example. Int J Mol Sci 14(12):24320–24337. doi: 10.3390/ijms141224320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sagona AP, Stenmark H (2010) Cytokinesis and cancer. FEBS Lett 584(12):2652–2661. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.03.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salinas PC (2007) Modulation of the microtubule cytoskeleton: a role for a divergent canonical Wnt pathway. Trends Cell Biol 17(7):333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh AV, Mehta KK, Worley K, Dordick JS, Kane RS, Wan LQ (2014) Carbon nanotube-induced loss of multicellular chirality on micropatterned substrate is mediated by oxidative stress. ACS Nano 8(3):2196–2205. doi: 10.1021/nn405253d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smita S, Gupta SK, Bartonova A, Dusinska M, Gutleb AC, Rahman Q (2012) Nanoparticles in the environment: assessment using the causal diagram approach. Environ Health. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S13 Google Scholar
  36. Soenen SJ, Nuytten N, De Meyer SF, De Smedt SC, De Cuyper M (2010) High intracellular iron oxide nanoparticle concentrations affect cellular cytoskeleton and focal adhesion kinase-mediated signaling. Small 6(7):832–842. doi: 10.1002/smll.200902084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Song Y, Li X, Wang L, Rojanasakul Y, Castranova V, Li H, Ma J (2011) Nanomaterials in humans: identification, characteristics, and potential damage. Toxicol Pathol 39(5):841–849. doi: 10.1177/0192623311413787 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Srivastava RK, Rahman Q, Kashyap MP, Lohani M, Pant AB (2011) Ameliorative effects of dimetylthiourea and N-acetylcysteine on nanoparticles induced cyto-genotoxicity in human lung cancer cells-A549. PLoS One 6(9):e25767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stöber W, Fink A (1968) Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interfac Sci 26(1):62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tay CY, Cai P, Setyawati MI, Fang W, Tan LP, Hong CH, Chen X, Leong DT (2014) Nanoparticles strengthen intracellular tension and retard cellular migration. Nano Lett 14(1):83–88. doi: 10.1021/nl4032549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vader G, Medema RH, Lens SM (2006) The chromosomal passenger complex: guiding Aurora-B through mitosis. J Cell Biol 173(6):833–837. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van der Waal MS, Hengeveld RC, van der Horst A, Lens SM (2012) Cell division control by the Chromosomal Passenger Complex. Exp Cell Res 318(12):1407–1420. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vitre BD, Cleveland DW (2012) Centrosomes, chromosome instability (CIN) and aneuploidy. Curr Opin Cell Biol 24(6):809–815. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang F, Gao F, Lan M, Yuan H, Huang Y, Liu J (2009) Oxidative stress contributes to silica nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity in human embryonic kidney cells. Toxicol Vitro 23(5):808–815. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang W, Li Y, Liu X, Jin M, Du H, Liu Y, Huang P, Zhou X, Yuan L, Sun Z (2013) Multinucleation and cell dysfunction induced by amorphous silica nanoparticles in an L-02 human hepatic cell line. Int J Nanomed 8:3533–3541. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S46732 Google Scholar
  46. Xue JZ, Funabiki H (2014) Nuclear assembly shaped by microtubule dynamics. Nucleus 5(1):40–46. doi: 10.4161/nucl.28168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang JF, Cao JG, Tian L, Liu F (2012) 5, 7-Dimethoxyflavone sensitizes TRAIL-induced apoptosis through DR5 upregulation in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 69(1):195–206. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1686-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yoshida K, Obata S, Ono M, Esaki M, Maejima T, Sawada H (2007) TPA-induced multinucleation of a mesenchymal stem cell-like clone is mediated primarily by karyokinesis without cytokinesis, although cell–cell fusion also occurs. Eur J Cell Biol 86(8):461–471. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2007.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zafarullah M, Li WQ, Sylvester J, Ahmad M (2003) Molecular mechanisms of N-acetylcysteine actions. Cell Mol Life Sci 60(1):6–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zumbrunn J, Kinoshita K, Hyman AA, Näthke IS (2001) Binding of the adenomatous polyposis coli protein to microtubules increases microtubule stability and is regulated by GSK3β phosphorylation. Curr Biol 11(1):44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weijia Geng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yang Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yongbo Yu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yang Yu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Junchao Duan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lizhen Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qiuling Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhiwei Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Public HealthCapital Medical UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental ToxicologyCapital Medical UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations