Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, 16:2579 | Cite as

Theoretical characterization of highly efficient porphyrazin dye sensitized solar cells

  • A. S. Shalabi
  • A. M. El Mahdy
  • M. M. Assem
  • H. O. Taha
  • K. A. Soliman
Research Paper

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) methodologies have been applied in an attempt to improve the performance of the dye YD2-o-C8 which is characterized by 11.9–12.7 % efficiencies. We aimed at narrowing the band gap of YD2-o-C8 to extend the light harvesting region to near IR. This was done through replacing the porphyrin macrocycle by the tetraazaporphyrin (porphyrazin) macrocycle, so that the performances of the suggested cells could be improved with Ti38O76, (TiO2)60, SiC, ZrO2, and GaP semiconductor electrodes. The effects of modifying the central macrocycle on cell performance are confirmed in terms of FMOs, energy gaps, electrode (VB and CB) edges, density of states (DOS), MEPs, dipole moments, IP, EA, reorganization energies, UV–Vis absorption, ΦLHE, Φinjection, and life times of the excited states. Replacing porphyrin macrocycle by porphyrazin macrocycle resulted in charge separated states, unidirectional charge transfer, narrower band gaps, increase of DOS nearby Fermi levels, asymmetric polarization, delocalization of the negative charges near the anchoring groups, efficient electron injection, suppressing macrocycle aggregation, active dye regeneration, longer life times of the excited states, and inhibited dye recombination. Co-sensitizers are suggested for near IR sensitization to improve the photo-to-current conversion efficiency. Size ranges: for dyes (0.1–1 nm), and for pore diameters of a dye sensitized mesoporous film of TiO2 (2–50 nm).

Key words

Theoretical characterization Porphyrazin DSSCs Density function theory (DFT) Time Dependent DFT Modeling and simulation 

References

  1. Balanay MP, Kim DH (2009) Structures and excitation energies of Zn–tetraarylporphyrin analogues: a theoretical study. J Mol Struct 910:20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbara PF, Meyer TJ, Ratner MA (1996) Contemporary issues in electron transfer research. J Phys Chem 100:13148–13168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becke AD (1988) Density–functional exchange–energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys Rev A 38:3098–3100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caballol R, Castell O, Illas F, Malrieu JP, Moreira IPR (1997) Remarks on the proper use of the broken symmetry approach to magnetic coupling. J Phys Chem A 101:7860–7866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahen D, Hodes G, Gratzel M, Juillemoles JF, Riess I (2000) Nature of photovoltaic action in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem B 104:2053–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen SL, Yang LN, Li ZS (2013) How to design more efficient organic dyes for dye sensitized solar cells? Adding more sp2-hybridized nitrogen in the triphenylamine donor. J Power Sources 223:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ditchfield R (1972) Molecular orbital theory of magnetic shielding and magnetic susceptibility. J Chem Phys 56(1972):5688–5692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong H, Zhou X, Jiang C (2012) Molecular design and theoretical investigation on novel porphyrin derivatives for dye-sensitized solar cells. Theor Chem Acc 131:1102–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duncan WR, Stier W, Prezhdo OV (2007) Ab initio simulations of photoinduced molecule–semiconductor electron transfer, chap. 11. In: Balbuena PB, Seminario JM (eds) Nanomaterials: design and simulation. Elsevier BV, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Einstein A (1917) On the quantum theory of radiation. Phys Z 18:121–128Google Scholar
  12. Frisch MJ et al (2010) Gaussian 98. Gaussian Inc., PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  13. García-Iglesias M, Cid JJ, Yum JH, Forneli A, Vázquez P, Nazeeruddin MK, Palomares E, Grätzel M, Torres T (2011) Increasing the efficiency of zinc-phthalocyanine based solar cells through modification of the anchoring ligand. Energy Environ Sci 4:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gouterman M (1961) Spectra of porphyrins. J Mol Spectrosc 6:138–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gratzel M (2001) Review article. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 414(2001):338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haque SA, Tachibana Y, Willis RL, Moser JE, Grätzel M, Klug DR, Durrant JR (2000) Parameters influencing charge recombination kinetics in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline titanium dioxide films. J Phys Chem B 104:538–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hara K, Wang ZS, Sato T, Furube A, Katoh R, Sugihara H, Dan-oh Y, Kasada C, Shinpo A, Suga S (2005) Oligothiophene-containing coumarin dyes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem B 109:15476–15482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardin BE, Snaith HJ, McGehee MD (2012) The renaissance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat Photon 6:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horiuchi T, Miura H, Sumioka K, Uchida S (2004) High efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells based on metal-free indoline dyes. J Am Chem Soc 126:12218–12219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchison GR, Ratner MA, Marks TJ (2005) Hopping transport in conductive heterocyclic oligomers: reorganization energies and substituent effects. J Am Chem Soc 127:2339–2350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jing D, Guo L, Zhao L, Zhang X, Liu H, Li M, Shen S, Liu G, Hu X, Zhang X, Zhang K, Ma L, Guo P (2010) Efficient solar hydrogen production by photocatalytic water splitting: from fundamental study to pilot demonstration. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:7087–7097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katoh R, Furube A, Yoshihara T, Hara K, Fujihashi G, Takano S, Murata S, Arakawa H, Tachiya M (2004) Efficiencies of electron injection from excited N3 dye into nanocrystalline semiconductor (ZrO2, TiO2, ZnO, Nb2O5, SnO2, In2O3) films. J Phys Chem B 108:4818–4822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kose ME, Mitchell WJ, Kopidakis N, Chang CH, Shaheen SE, Kim K, Rumbles G (2007) Theoretical studies on conjugated phenyl-cored thiophene dendrimers for photovoltaic applications. J Am Chem Soc 129:14257–14270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37:785–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee MJ, Balanay MP, Kim DH (2012) Molecular design of distorted push–pull porphyrins for dye-sensitized solar cells. Theor Chem Acc 131:1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lundqvist MJ, Nilsing M, Persson P, Luell S (2006) DFT study of bare and dye-sensitized TiO2 clusters and nanocrystals. Int J Quantum Chem 106:3214–3234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marques MAL, Gross EKU (2004) Time-dependent density functional theory. Annu Rev Phys Chem 55:427–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moser JE, Gratzel M (1993) Observation of temperature independent heterogeneous electron transfer reactions in the inverted Marcus region. Chem Phys 176:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Naray-Szabo G, Ferenczy GG (1995) Molecular electrostatics. Chem Rev 95:829–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nazeeruddin MK, Angelis FD, Fantacci S, Selloni A, Viscardi G, Liska P, Ito S, Takeru B, Gratzel M (2005) Combined experimental and DFT–TDDFT computational study of photoelectrochemical cell ruthenium sensitizers. J Am Chem Soc 127:16835–16847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ning Z, Zhang Q, Pei H, Luan J, Lu C, Cui Y, Tian H (2009) Photovoltage improvement for dye-sensitized solar cells via cone-shaped structural design. J Phys Chem C 113:10307–10313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Boyle NM, Tenderholt AL, Langner KM (2008) cclib: a library for package-independent computational chemistry algorithms. J Comput Chem 29:839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Philaga K, Kleinpeter E (1994) Carbon-13 chemical in structural and stereochemical analysis. VCH Publishers, Deerfield BeachGoogle Scholar
  34. Prasad O, Sinha L, Misra N, Narayan V, Kumar N, Pathak J (2010) Molecular structure and vibrational study on 2,3-dihydro-1H-indene and its derivative 1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione by density functional theory calculations. J Mol Struct 940:82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Preat J, Michaux C, Jacquemin D, Perpète EA (2009) Enhanced efficiency of organic dye-sensitized solar cells: triphenylamine derivatives. J Phys Chem C 113:16821–16833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Preat J, Jacquemin D, Michaux C, Perpète EA (2010) Improvement of the efficiency of thiophene-bridged compounds for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Phys 376:56–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ragoussi ME, Cid JJ, Yum JH, Torre G, Censo DD, Grätzel M, Nazeeruddin MK, Torres T (2012) Carboxyethynyl anchoring ligands: a means to improving the efficiency of phthalocyanine-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem 51:4375–4378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Retsek JL, Drain CM, Kirmaier C, Nurco DJ, Medforth J, Smith KM, Sazanovich IV, Chirvony VS, Fajer J, Holten D (2003) Photoinduced axial ligation and deligation dynamics of nonplanar nickel dodecaarylporphyrins. J Am Chem Soc 125:9787–9800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Senge MO, Fazekas M, Notaras EGA, Blau WJ, Zawadzka M, Locos OB, Mhuircheartaigh EMN (2007) Nonlinear optical properties of porphyrins. Adv Mater 19:2737–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shalabi AS, El Mahdy AM, Assem MM, Taha HO, Abdel Halim WS (2013) Theoretical characterization of highly efficient dye sensitized solar cells. Mol Phys. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2013.795249
  41. Tachinaba Y, Haque SA, Mercer IP, Durrant JR, Klug D (2000) Electron injection and recombination in dye sensitized nanocrystalline titanium dioxide films: a comparison of ruthenium bipyridyl and porphyrin sensitizer dyes. J Phys Chem B 104:1198–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vosko SH, Wilk L, Nusair M (1980) Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can J Phys 58:1200–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang DL, Shen HT, Gu HM, Zhai YC (2006) Ab initio studies on the molecular electrostatic potential of C50. J Mol Struct 776:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang J, Bai FQ, Xia BH, Feng L, Zhang HX, Pan QJ (2011) On the viability of cyclometalated Ru(II) complexes as dyes in DSSC regulated by COOH group, a DFT study. Chem Phys Phys Chem 13:2206–2213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waston DF, Meyer GJ (2005) Electron injection at dye-sensitized semiconductor electrodes. Annu Rev Phys Chem 56:119–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wolinski K, Hinton JF, Pulay P (1990) Efficient implementation of the gauge-independent atomic orbital method for NMR chemical shift calculations. J Am Chem Soc 112:8251–8260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang LN, Sun ZZ, Chen SL, Li ZS (2013) The effects of various anchoring groups on optical and electronic properties of dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Dyes Pigm 99:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yella A, Lee HW, Tsao HN, Yi C, Chandiran AK, Nazeeruddin MK, Diau EWG, Yeh CY, Zakeeruddin SM, Gratzel M (2011) Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency. Science 334:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yum JH, Hagberg DP, Moon SJ, Karlsson KM, Marinado T, Sun L, Hagfeldt A, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M (2009) A light-resistant organic sensitizer for solar-cell applications. Angew Chem 121:1604–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang R, Du B, Sun G, Sun Y (2010) Experimental and theoretical studies on o-, m- and p-chlorobenzylideneaminoantipyrines. Spectrochim Acta A 75:1115–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang S, Yang X, Numata Y, Han L (2013) Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells: progress and future challenges. Energy Environ Sci 6:1443–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Shalabi
    • 1
  • A. M. El Mahdy
    • 2
  • M. M. Assem
    • 1
  • H. O. Taha
    • 2
  • K. A. Soliman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceBenha UniversityBenhaEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Faculty of EducationAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations