Advertisement

Effect of titanium doping on the structure and reducibility of nanoparticle molybdenum dioxide

  • Qian He
  • Oscar Marin-Flores
  • Shuozhen Hu
  • Louis Scudiero
  • Su Ha
  • M. Grant Norton
Research Paper

Abstract

Molybdenum dioxide (MoO2) has potential not only in heterogeneous catalysis, but also as an electrode material in lithium-ion batteries and fuel cells. However, the reduction tendency to molybdenum metal is a limiting factor in the use of this oxide. In the present work, MoO2 was doped with Titanium (Ti4+) to increase the stability to reduction in a hydrogen-rich environment. Rather than using a conventional high-temperature solid-state reaction, a novel solution-based synthesis method followed by hydrothermal reduction was used. Nano-sized Ti-doped MoO2 particles with Ti/Mo atomic ratios of 0, 0.03, and 0.05 were prepared and characterized. X-ray and time-of-flight neutron powder diffraction (XRD and NPD) confirmed the presence of only the MoO2 phase. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the nanoparticles had an acicular morphology with particle sizes in the long dimension between 30 and 50 nm. Elemental mapping obtained by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy showed homogenous distribution of the dopant. Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that the solubility limit of the synthesized Ti-doped MoO2 was reached at a Ti/Mo ratio of 0.05. This observation indicates that the bulk thermodynamic solubility limit can be exceeded at the nanoscale. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy performed on 0.03 Ti-doped MoO2 samples showed that the Ti dopant is present as Ti4+ and the depth profile analysis indicated the presence of this species even in the bulk of the sample. This agrees with the data obtained from Rietveld refinement of the XRD and NPD results, which showed changes in the lattice parameters and Mo–Mo interatomic distance upon doping, suggesting a substitution of Mo4+ by Ti4+. The effect of Ti doping on the reducibility of MoO2 was demonstrated by in situ XRD in a hydrogen-rich environment.

Keywords

Nanoparticle molybdenum dioxide Ti-doped Rietveld refinement Reducibility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CBET1034308) and the Office of Naval Research (N00014-12-1-0830). Use of the Spallation Neutron Source is supported by the Division of Scientific User Facilities, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy.

References

  1. Aryanpour M, Hoffmann R, Di Salvo FJ (2009) Tungsten-doped titanium dioxide in the rutile structure: theoretical considerations. Chem Mater 21:1627–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auborn JJ, Barberio YL (1987) Lithium intercalation cells without metallic lithium. J Electrochem Soc 134:638–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodie I, Muray JJ (1992) The physics of micro/nano-fabrication. Plenum, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burdett JK (1995) Structural-electronic relationships in rutile. Acta Cryst B51:547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter CB, Norton MG (2007) Ceramic materials: science and engineering. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiorino A, Ghiotti G, Prinetto F, Carotta MC, Gnani D, Martinelli G (1999) Preparation and characterization of SnO2 and MoOx–SnO2 nanosized powders for thick film gas sensors. Sens Actuator B 58:338–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotton FA (1966) Transition-metal compounds containing clusters of metal atoms. Q Rev Chem Soc 20:389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dukstiene N, Sinkeviciute D, Guobiene A (2012) Morphological, structural and optical properties of MoO2 films electrodeposited on SnO2 glass plate. Cent Eur J Chem 10:1108–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellefson CA, Marin-Flores O, Ha S, Norton MG (2012) Synthesis and applications of molybdenum(IV) oxide. J Mater Sci 47:2057–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffith RH, Lindars PR (1950) Physical properties of promoted molybdenum catalysts. Nature 165:486–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu WB, Li LP, Li GS, Tang CL, Sun L (2009) High-quality brookite TiO2 flowers: synthesis, characterization, and dielectric performance. Cryst Growth Des 9:3676–3682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huq A, Hodges JP, Gourdon O, Heroux L (2011) Powgen: a third-generation high resolution high-throughput powder diffraction instrument at the spallation neutron source. Z Kristallogr Proc 1:127–135Google Scholar
  13. Huso J, Morrison JL, Hoeck H, Casey E, Bergman L, Pounds TD, Norton MG (2007) Low temperature LO-phonon dynamics of MgZnO nanoalloys. Appl Phys Lett 91:111906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacob KT, Shekhar C, Waseda Y (2008) Thermodynamic properties and phase diagram for the system MoO2–TiO2. J Am Ceram Soc 91:563–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katrib A, Mey D, Maire G (2001) Molybdenum and tungsten dioxides, XO2 (X = Mo, W), as reforming catalysts for hydrocarbon compounds. Catal Today 65:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kröger FA, Vink HJ (1956) Relations between the concentrations of imperfections in crystalline solids. Solid State Phys 3:307–435Google Scholar
  17. Kwon BW, Ellefson C, Breit J, Kim J, Norton MG, Ha S (2013) Molybdenum dioxide-based anode for solid oxide fuel cell application. J Power Sources 243:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larson AC, Von Dreele RB (2000) General structure analysis system (GSAS). Los Alamos National Lab Report LAUR 86-748Google Scholar
  19. Lee JG, Mori H (2004) Direct evidence for reversible diffusional phase change in nanometer-sized alloy particles. Phys Rev Lett B 93:235501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee JG, Mori H, Yasuda H (2002) Alloy phase formation in nanometer-sized particles in the In-Sn system. Phys Rev B 65:132106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liang Y, Tracy C, Weisbrod E, Fejes P, Theodore ND (2006) Effect of SiO2 incorporation on stability and work function of conducting MoO2. Appl Phys Lett 88:081901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahajan SS, Mujawar SH, Shinde PS, Inamdar AI, Patil PS (2009) Structural, morphological, optical and electrochemical properties of Ti-doped MoO3 thin films. Sol Energy Mat Sol Cells 93:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marin-Flores O, Ha S (2009) Activity and stability studies of MoO2 catalyst for the partial oxidation of gasoline. Appl Catal A 352:124–132Google Scholar
  24. Marin-Flores O, Scudiero L, Ha S (2009) X-ray diffraction and photoelectron spectroscopy studies of MoO2 as catalyst for partial oxidation of isooctane. Surf Sci 603:2327–2332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marin-Flores O, Turba T, Ellefson C, Scudiero L, Breit J, Norton MG, Ha S (2010a) Nanoparticle molybdenum dioxide: a new alternative catalytic material for hydrogen production via partial oxidation of Jet-A fuels. J Nanoelectron Optoelectron 5:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marin-Flores O, Turba T, Ellefson C, Wang K, Breit J, Ahn J, Norton MG, Ha S (2010b) Nanoparticle molybdenum dioxide: a highly active catalyst for partial oxidation of aviation fuels. Appl Catal B Environ 98:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marin-Flores O, Turba T, Ellefson C, Scudiero L, Breit J, Norton MG, Ha S (2011) Sulfur poisoning of molybdenum dioxide during the partial oxidation of a Jet-A fuel surrogate. Appl Catal B Environ 105:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martos M, Morales J, Sánchez L (2002) Mechanochemical synthesis of Sn1−xMoxO2 anode materials for Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem 12:2979–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merouani A, Amardjia-Adnani H (2008) Spectroscopic FT-IR study of TiO2 films prepared by sol–gel method. Int Sci J Altern Energy Ecol 6:151–154Google Scholar
  30. Nolan NT, Seery MK, Pillai SC (2009) Spectroscopic investigation of the anatase-to-rutile transformation of sol–gel-synthesized TiO2 photocatalysts. J Phys Chem C 113:16151–16157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ouyang G, Tan X, Wang CX, Yang GW (2006) Solid solubility limit in alloying nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 17:4257–4262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pankratz LB (1982) Thermodynamic properties of elements and oxides. U.S. Bureau of Mines Bulletin No. 672, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Pauling L (1960) The nature of the chemical bond, 3rd edn. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  34. Prakash R, Phase DM, Choudhary RJ, Kumar R (2008) Structural, electrical and magnetic properties of Mo1−xFexO2 (x = 0–0.05) thin films grown by pulsed laser ablation. J Appl Phys 103:043712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers DB, Shannon RD, Sleight AW, Gillson JL (1969) Crystal chemistry of metal dioxide with rutile related structures. Inorg Chem 8:841–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scanlon DO, Watson GW, Payne DJ, Atkinson GR, Egdell RG, Law DSL (2010) Theoretical and experimental study of the electronic structure of MoO3 and MoO2. J Phys Chem C 114:4636–4645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schroeder T, Zegenhagen J, Magg N, Immaraporn B, Freund H-J (2004) Formation of a faceted MoO2 epilayer on Mo(112) studied by XPS, UPS and STM. Surf Sci 552:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shannon RD (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst A 32:751–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shi YF, Guo BK, Corr SA, Shi QH, Hu YS, Heier KR, Chen LQ, Seshadri R, Stucky GD (2009) Ordered mesoporous metallic MoO2 materials with highly reversible lithium storage capacity. Nano Lett 9:4215–4220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sibu CP, Kumar SR, Mukundan P, Warrier KGK (2002) Structural modifications and associated properties of lanthanum oxide doped sol–gel nanosized titanium oxide. Chem Mater 14:2876–2881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sutter EA, Sutter PW (2011) Giant carbon solubility in Au nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 46:7090–7097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Toby BH (2001) EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J Appl Cryst 34:210–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. West AR (1999) Basic solid state chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang JY, Boyd IW, O’Sullivan BJ, Hurley PK, Kelly PV, Sénateur JP (2002) Nanocrystalline TiO2 films studied by optical, XRD and FTIR spectroscopy. J Non-Cryst Solids 303:134–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qian He
    • 1
  • Oscar Marin-Flores
    • 1
  • Shuozhen Hu
    • 2
  • Louis Scudiero
    • 3
  • Su Ha
    • 2
  • M. Grant Norton
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and BioengineeringWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  3. 3.Chemistry Department and Materials Science and Engineering ProgramWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations