Leaching of nanoparticles from experimental water-borne paints under laboratory test conditions

  • Stefano Zuin
  • Marco Gaiani
  • Arlen Ferrari
  • Luana Golanski
Research Paper


In this study we investigated the release of titanium dioxide (TiO2), silver (Ag) and silica (SiO2) engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) from three different paints by using standardized water immersion test for coatings. Fibre-cement panels were coated with paints containing ENPs and then exposed to UV light and abraded to simulate weathering. After the static water immersion test, we observed a very low release of Ti (4–8 μg/l), while the Ag measured in leachates was under detection limit (0.1 μg/l). A small release of Si was measured in leachates, with 73 mg/l of Si released from paints containing SiO2 ENPs after 120 h of water immersion. The cumulative loss of Si was about 1.8 % with respect to initial amount of Si in paint. Microscopic results highlighted that SiO2 ENPs are mainly released in form of agglomerates with other particles, and only very few single SiO2 ENPs were found in leachates. The results confirmed that Si migration is related to immersion cycles (wetting and drying cycles) of tested paints.


Engineered nanoparticles Façade coatings Leaching test Nanomaterials release Water-based paints Exposure Environmental and health effects 

Supplementary material

11051_2013_2185_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1077 kb)


  1. Aitken RJ, Creely KS, Tran CL (2004) Nanoparticles: an occupational hygiene review. HSE research report 274, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2012) ASTM D6442-06:2012 standard test method for copper release rates of antifouling coating systems in substitute ocean water. ASTM, ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  3. Benn TM, Westerhoff P (2008) Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environ Sci Technol 42:4133–4139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bierwagen GP, Huovinen AM (2010) 4.11—paint formulation. In: Richardson TJA (ed) Shreir’s corrosion, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2643–2665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brock T, Groteklaes M, Mischke P (2000) European coatings handbook. In: Vincentz network, 2nd edn. Verlag V, Hannover, pp 370–373Google Scholar
  6. Cao G (2004) Physical chemistry of solid surface. In: Cao G (ed) Nanostructured and nanomaterials: synthesis, properties and applications. Imperial College Press, London, pp 15–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2002) EN 1062-11:2002 paint and varnish: coating materials and coating systems for exterior masonry and concrete. Part 11: methods of conditioning before testing. CEN, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrokhpay S, Morris GE, Fornasiero D, Self D (2010) Stabilization of titania pigment particles with anionic polymeric dispersants. Powder Technol 202:143–150Google Scholar
  9. Geranio L, Heuberger M, Nowack B (2009) The behavior of silver nanotextiles during washing. Environ Sci Technol 43:8113–8118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Global Industry Analysts Coatings (2012) Global strategic business report. Global Industry Analysts, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006) ISO 7784-2:2006 Paint and varnish—determination of resistance to abrasion. Part 2: rotating abrasive rubber wheel method. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2007a) ISO 15181-2:2007 Paint and varnish: determination of release rate of biocides from antifouling paints. Part 2: determination of copper ion concentration in extract and calculation of the release rate. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2007b) ISO 11507:2007 Paints and varnishes: exposure of coatings to artificial weathering: exposure to fluorescent UV lamps and water. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2007c) ISO 2812-2:2007 Paints and varnishes: determination of resistance to liquids. Part 2: water immersion test. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2008) ISO/TS 27687:2008 nanotechnologies: terminology and definitions for nano-objects. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A, Zuleeg S, Simmler H, Brunner S, Vonmont H, Burkhardt M, Boller M (2008) Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaegi R, Sinnet B, Zuleeg S, Hagendorfer H, Mueller E, Vonbank R, Boller M, Burkhardt M (2010) Release of silver nanoparticles from outdoor facades. Environ Pollut 158:2900–2905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaiser J-P, Zuin S, Wick P (2013) Is nanotechnology revolutionizing the paint and lacquer industry? A critiacal opinion. Sci Total Environ 442:282–289.Google Scholar
  19. Kalendová A, Veselý D, Kalenda P (2010) Properties of paints with hematite coated muscovite and talc particles. Appl Clay Sci 48:581–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karakas F, Celik MS (2012) Effect of quantity and size distribution of calcite filler on the quality of water borne paints. Prog Org Coat 74:555–563Google Scholar
  21. Khanna AS (2008) Nanotechnology in high performance paint coatings. Asian J Exp Sci 21:25–32Google Scholar
  22. Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Schneider T (2011) Comparison of dust released from sanding conventional and nanoparticles-doped wall and wood coatings. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:408–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mizutani T, Arai K, Miyamoto M, Kimura Y (2006) Application of silica-containing nanocomposite emulsion to wall paint: a new environmentally safe paint of high performance. Prog Org Coat 55:276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nowack B, Ranville JF, Diamond S, Gallego-Urrea JA, Metcalfe C, Rose J, Horne N, Koelmans AA, Klaine SJ (2012) Potential scenarios for nanomaterial release and subsequent alteration in the environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olabarrieta J, Zorita S, Pena I, Rioja N, Monzon O, Benguria P, Scifo L (2012) Aging of photocatalytic coatings under a water flow: long run performance and TiO2 nanoparticles release. Appl Catal B 123–124:182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007) OECD test nr. 313: estimation of emissions from preservative-treated wood to the environment: laboratory method from wooden commodities that are not covered and are in contact with fresh water or seawater. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, Sect. 3. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. Patel SH (2010) Processing aids. In: Xanthos M (ed) Functional fillers for plastics. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 407–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saber AT, Jensen KA, Jacobsen NR, Birkedal R, Mikkelsen L, Møller P, Loft S, Wallin H, Vogel U (2012) Inflammatory and genotoxic effects of nanoparticles designed for inclusion in paints and lacquers. Nanotoxicology 6:453–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sambhy V, MacBride MM, Peterson BR, Sen A (2006) Silver bromide nanoparticles/polymer composites: dual action tunable antimicrobial materials. J Am Chem Soc 128:9798–9808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Savolainen K, Backman U, Brouwer D, Fadeel B, Fernandes T, Kuhlbusch T, Landsiedel R, Lynch I, Pylkkänen L (2013) Nanosafety in Europe 2015–2025: towards safe and sustainable nanomaterials and nanotechnology innovations. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  31. Schoknecht U, Gruycheva J, Mathies H, Bergmann H, Burkhardt M (2009) Leaching of biocides used in facade coatings under laboratory test conditions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9321–9328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schoknecht U, Topfer A, Uhlig S, Baldauf H (2012) Characterization of leaching of biocidal active substance of main group 2 ‘preservatives’ from different materials under weathering conditions. Project N. (FKZ) 3708 65 404. Report No. (UBA-FB) 001641/E. TEXTE 6272012. Federal Environmental Agency, UmweltbundesamtGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoon J, Van der Heydenc L, Eloy P, Gaigneux EM, De Buysser K, Van Driesschee I, De Belie N (2012) Waste fibrecement: an interesting alternative raw material for a sustainable Portland clinker production. Constr Build Mater 36:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smulders S, Kaiser J-P, Zuin S, Van Landuyt L, Golanski L, Vanoirbeek J, Wick P, Hoet P (2012) Contamination of nanoparticles by endotoxin: evaluation of different test methods. Part Fibre Toxicol 9:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Som C, Wick P, Krug H, Nowack B (2011) Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextile and facade coatings. Environ Intern 37:1131–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tiarks F, Frechen T, Kirsch S, Leuninger J, Melan M, Pfau A, Richter F, Schuler B, Zhao C-L (2002) Formulation effects on the distribution of pigment particles in paints. Progr Org Coat 48:140–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Sloot HA, Heasman L, Quevauviller Ph (1998) General principles for the leaching and extraction of materials, Chap 2. In: Van der Sloot HA, Heasman L, Quevauviller Ph (eds) Harmonization of leaching/extraction test, vol 70., Studies in environmental science Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Werner R (2000) Effect of extenders with narrow and broad particle size distributions on the properties of coatings. J Coat Technol 72:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Westerhoff P, Nowack B (2013) Searching for global descriptors of engineered nanomaterial fate and transport in the environment. Acc Chem Res 46:844–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (2011) Nanotechnology consumer product inventory. http://www.nanotechproject.org/. Accessed 12 March 2013
  41. Zhou SX, Wu L, Sun J (2003) Effect of nanosilica on the properties of polyester-based polyurethane. J App Polym Sci 88:189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zuccheri T, Colonna M, Stefanini I, Santini C, Di Gioia D (2013) Bactericidal activity of aqueous acrylic paint dispersion for wooden substrates based on TiO2 nanoparticles activated by fluorescent light. Materials 6:3270–3283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Zuin
    • 1
  • Marco Gaiani
    • 1
  • Arlen Ferrari
    • 2
  • Luana Golanski
    • 3
  1. 1.Venice Research ConsortiumVeniceItaly
  2. 2.GFC Chimica s.r.l.FerraraItaly
  3. 3.CEA Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies AlternativesGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations