A new approach for determination of fouling potential by colloidal nanoparticles during reverse osmosis (RO) membrane filtration of seawater

  • Ji Yeon Park
  • Sungil Lim
  • Kihong ParkEmail author
Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Nanotechnology for Sustainable Development


A direct measurement of number concentration of colloidal nanoparticles (15–450 nm) in water was made with the membrane filtration-differential mobility analyzer technique, and its corresponding flux decline rate (FDR) was determined by laboratory-scale RO fouling test unit using varying number concentrations of silica nanoparticles in artificial seawaters. This relationship was used to predict fouling potential of colloidal nanoparticles in reverse osmosis (RO) membrane process of seawaters in RO plant. It was found that the FDR linearly increased with the increasing number of colloidal nanoparticles for the given concentration range and that the relationship between the number concentration and the FDR also depended on RO membrane surface properties. Data for estimated FDR values for natural seawaters after pretreatment showed a clear difference among samples, which is contrary to the pre-existing index such as silt density index and modified fouling index. Our data suggest that measurement of colloidal nanoparticles is useful for selection of proper pretreatment and successful operation of RO membrane process along with other particle fouling predictors accounting for large particles (>450 nm).


Colloidal nanoparticles Counting Fouling Reverse osmosis Membrane 



The research described in this paper was supported by the Center for Seawater Desalination (B01-05-03) and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant (National Leading Research Laboratory) funded by the Korea Government (No. 2012-0006318). We appreciate Dr. Youngbaem Yu (Korea University, Seoul, Korea) for his assistance on the FDR measurement.


  1. Belfort G, Davis RH, Zydney AL (1994) The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J Membr Sci 96(1–2):1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boerlage SFE, Kennedy MD, Dickson MR, El-Hodali DEY, Schippers JC (2002) The modified fouling index using ultrafiltration membranes (MFI-UF), characterization, filtration mechanisms and proposed reference membrane. J Membr Sci 197(1–2):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boussu K, Belpaire A, Volodin A, Van Haesendonck C, Van der Meeren P, Vandecasteele C, Van der Bruggen B (2007) Influence of membrane and colloid characteristics on fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 289(1–2):220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brauns E, Hoff EV, Molenberghs B, Dotremont C, Doyen W, Leysen R (2002) A new method of measuring and presenting the membrane fouling potential. Desalination 150(1–3):31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butt FH, Rahman F, Baduruthamal U (1997) Characterization of foulants by autopsy of RO desalination membranes. Desalination 114(1):51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi J-S, Hwang T-M, Lee S, Hong S (2009) A systematic approach to determine the fouling index for a RO/NF membrane process. Desalination 238(1–3):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chua KT, Hawlader MNA, Malek A (2003) Pretreatment of seawater: results of pilot trials in Singapore. Desalination 159(1):225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Howe KJ, Clark MM (2002) Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ Sci Technol 36(16):3571–3576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khirani S, Aim RB, Manero M (2006) Improving the measurement of the Modified Fouling Index using nanofiltration membranes (NF-MFI). Desalination 191(1–3):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li Q, Elimelech M (2006) Synergistic effects in combined fouling of a loose nanofiltration membrane by colloidal materials and natural organic matter. J Membr Sci 278(1–2):72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ling TY, Wang J, Pui DY (2010) Measurement of retention efficiency of filters against nanoparticles in liquids using an aerosolization technique. Environ Sci Technol 44:774–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luo M, Wang Z (2001) Complex fouling and cleaning-in-place of a reverse osmosis desalination system. Desalination 141(1):15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ng HY, Elimelech M (2004) Influence of colloidal fouling on rejection of trace organic contaminants by reverse osmosis. J Membr Sci 244:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Park J, Cho J, Park K (2009a) Evaluation of quantitative performance of the membrane filtration-differential mobility analyzer (MF-DMA) counting technique to determine suspended particles and dissolved solids in water. Desalination 247(1–3):316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park K, Park J, Lee S, Cho J (2009b) Measurement of size and number of suspended and dissolved nanoparticles in water for evaluation of colloidal fouling in RO membranes. Desalination 238(1–3):78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Park J, Lim S, Han S, Park K (2011) Quantification of a mixture of insoluble submicrometer particles and dissolved solids in water using membrane filtration and aerosolization method. Aerosol Sci Technol 45(8):1010–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schippers JC, Hannemaayer JH, Smolders CA, Kostense A (1981) Predicting flux decline in reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 38:339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Song L, Chen KL, Ong SL, Ng WJ (2004) A new normalization method for determination of colloidal fouling potential in membrane processes. J Colloid Interface Sci 271(2):426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Paasen JAM, Kruithof JC, Bakker SM, Schoonenberg Kegel F (1998) Integrated multi-objective membrane systems for surface water treatment: pretreatment of nanofiltration by riverbank filtration and conventional ground water treatment. Desalination 118(1–3):239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vrijenhoek EM, Hong S, Elimelech M (2001) Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 188(1–2):115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang Z, Chu J, Zhang X (2007) Study of a cake model during stirred dead-end microfiltration. Desalination 217(1–3):127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang J, Lee S, Lee E, Lee J, Hong S (2009) Effect of solution chemistry on the surface property of reverse osmosis membranes under seawater conditions. Desalination 247(1–3):148–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu Y, Lee S, Hong K, Hong S (2010) Evaluation of membrane fouling potential by multiple membrane array system (MMAS): measurements and applications. J Membr Sci 362(1–2):279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang M, Song L (2000) Mechanisms and parameters affecting flux decline in cross-flow microfiltration and ultrafiltration of colloids. Environ Sci Technol 34(17):3767–3773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhu X, Elimelech M (1997) Colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: measurements and fouling mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 31(12):3654–3662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringGwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)GwangjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations