Surface-induced structural modification in ZnO nanoparticles

Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Nanomaterials in energy, health and environment

Abstract

The majority of unusual properties of semiconductor nanoparticles arise both from quantum confinement effects or from surfaces effects. While the first one is reasonably well understood, very little is known about the effects of the surfaces on these nanostructures. In this manuscript, we have analyzed, by using ab initio methods based on the density functional theory, the structural modifications on the surfaces of ZnO nanoparticles smaller than 2 nm. We have observed a decrease in the bond distance between Zn and O atoms nearby the surface, and also a tendency for larger bond angles at these surfaces. This occurs to reduce the surface energy due to the presence of surface dangling bonds at the surfaces. These results should be important to help analyze experimental results.

Keywords

ZnO Nanocrystal surfaces Quantum confinement Structural configuration Ab initio calculations Density functional theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported, in part, by Brazilian agencies CAPES, FAPESP, and CNPq. We thank CENAPAD-SP for computational support.

References

  1. Arantes JT, da Silva AJR, Fazzio A (2007) Structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of Mn-doped Ge nanowires by ab initio calculations. Phys Rev B 75:115113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berrettini MG, Braun G, Hu JG, Strouse GF (2004) NMR analysis of surfaces and interfaces in 2-nm CdSe. J Am Chem Soc 126:7063–7070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blochl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–17979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang LY, Barnard AS, Gontard LC, Dunin-Borkowski RE (2010) Resolving the structure of active sites on platinum catalytic nanoparticles. Nano Lett 10:3073–3076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chelikowsky JR, Alemany MMG, Chan TL, Dalpian GM (2011) Computational studies of doped nanostructures. Rep Prog Phys 74:046501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Claeyssens F, Freeman CL, Allan NL, Sun Y, Ashfold MNR, Harding JH (2005) Growth of ZnO thin films? Experiment and theory. J Mater Chem 15:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clift MJD, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Brown DM, Duffin R, Donaldson K, Proudfoot L, Guy K, Stone V (2008) The impact of different nanoparticle surface chemistry and size on uptake and toxicity in a murine macrophage cell line. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 232:418–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman CL, Claeyssens F, Allan NL (2006) Graphitic nanofilms as precursors to wurtzite films: theory. Phys Rev Lett 96:066102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galland C, Ghosh Y, Steinbrück A, Sykora M, Hollingsworth JA, Klimov VI, Htoon H (2011) Two types of luminescence blinking revealed by spectroelectrochemistry of single quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol 479:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han P, Bester G (2012) Insights about the surface of colloidal nanoclusters from their vibrational and thermodynamic properties. J Phys Chem C 116:10790–10795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hohenberg P, Kohn W (1964) Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev 136:B864–B871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang X, Lindgren E, Chelikowsky JR (2005) Surface passivation method for semiconductor nanostructures. Phys Rev B 71:165328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huxter VM, Lee A, Lo SS, Scholes GD (2008) CdSe nanoparticle elasticity and surface energy. Nano Lett 9:405–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kohn W, Sham LJ (1965) Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 140:A1133–A1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Puzder A, Williamson AJ, Gygi F, Galli G (2004) Self-healing of CdSe nanocrystals: first-principles calculations. Phys Rev Lett 92:217401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schoenhalz AL, Arantes JT, Fazzio A, Dalpian GM (2009) Surface magnetization in non-doped ZnO nanostructures. Appl Phys Lett 94:162503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schoenhalz AL, Arantes JT, Fazzio A, Dalpian GM (2010) Surface and quantum confinement effects in ZnO nanocrystals. J Phys Chem C 114:18293–18297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tomaselli M, Yarger JL, Bruchez M, Havlin RH, deGraw D, Pines A, Alivisatos AP (1999) NMR study of InP quantum dots: surface structure and size effects. J Chem Phys 110:8861–8864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tusche C, Meyerheim HL, Kirschner J (2007) Observation of depolarized ZnO(0001) monolayers: formation of unreconstructed planar sheets. Phys Rev Lett 99:026102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Viswanatha R, Sapra S, Satpati B, Satyam PV, Dev BN, Sarma DD (2004) Understanding the quantum size effects in ZnO nanocrystals. J Mater Chem 14:661–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu H, Li J, Loomis RA, Wang LW, Buhro WE (2003) Two- versus three-dimensional quantum confinement in indium phosphide wires and dots. Nat Mater 2:517–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Ciências Naturais e HumanasUniversidade Federal do ABCSanto AndréBrazil

Personalised recommendations