A novel method for bacterial inactivation using electrosprayed water nanostructures

  • Georgios Pyrgiotakis
  • James McDevitt
  • Toshiyuki Yamauchi
  • Philip Demokritou
Research Paper

Abstract

This is a study focusing on the potential to deactivate biological agents (bacteria and endospores) using engineered water nanostructures (EWNS). The EWNS were generated using an electrospray device that collects water by condensing atmospheric water vapor on a Peltier-cooled electrode. A high voltage is applied between the collection electrode and a grounded electrode resulting in aerosolization of the condensed water and a constant generation of EWNS. Gram-negative Serratia marcescens, gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillusatrophaeus endospores were placed on stainless steel coupons and exposed to generated EWNS at multiple time intervals. Upon exposures, the bacteria were recovered and placed on nutrient agar to grow, and the colony forming units were counted. Ozone levels as well as air temperature and relative humidity were monitored during the experiments. Qualitative confirmation of bacterial destruction was also obtained by transmission electron microscopy. In addition, important EWNS aerosol properties such as particle number concentration as a function of size as well as the average surface charge of the generated EWNS were measured using real-time instrumentation. It was shown that the novel electrospray method can generate over time a constant flux of EWNS. EWNS have a peak number concentration of ~8,000 particles per cubic centimeter with a modal peak size around 20 nm. The average surface charge of the generated EWNS was found to be 10 ± 2 electrons per particle. In addition, it was shown that the EWNS have the potential to deactivate both bacteria types from surfaces. At the same administrate dose, however, the endospores were not inactivated. This novel method and the unique properties of the generated EWNS could potentially be used to develop an effective, environmentally friendly, and inexpensive method for bacteria inactivation.

Keywords

Antibacterial Electrospray Engineered water nanostructures Aerosol 

References

  1. Archer GL (1998) Staphylococcus aureus: a well-armed pathogen. Clin Infect Dis 26:1179–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atrih A, Foster S (2002) Bacterial endospores the ultimate survivors. Int Dairy J 12:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolon M (2011) Hand hygiene. Infect Dis Clin N Am 25:21–43. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2010.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boys BL, Kuprowski MC, Noël JJ, Konermann L (2009) Protein oxidative modifications during electrospray ionization: solution phase electrochemistry or corona discharge-induced radical attack? Anal Chem 81:4027–4034. doi:10.1021/ac900243p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaki M, Fernandez-Ocana AM, Valderrama R et al (2008) Involvement of reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (RNS and ROS) in sunflower–mildew interaction. Plant Cell Physiol 50:265–279. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcn196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen CY, Wu LC, Chen HY, Chung YC (2010) Inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in water using photocatalysis with fixed TiO2. Water Air Soil Pollut 212:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis JT, Foltz E, Blakemore WS (1970) Serratia marcescens. A pathogen of increasing clinical importance. JAMA 214:2190–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Juan L, La Mora De J (1997) Charge and size distributions of electrospray drops. J Colloid Interface Sci 186:280–293. doi:10.1006/jcis.1996.4654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demokritou P, Gupta T, Koutrakis P (2002) A high volume apparatus for the condensational growth of ultrafine particles for inhalation toxicological studies. Aerosol Sci Technol 36:1061–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujishima A, Zhang X (2006) Titanium dioxide photocatalysis: present situation and future approaches. C R Chim 9:750–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furuhashi K, Shigemoto N, Morikawa M (2004) Ion generator and air conditioner. US Patent 7,998,419. Filed May 10, 2004, and issued Aug 16, 2010Google Scholar
  12. Gaskell SJ (1997) Electrospray: principles and practice. J Mass Spectrom 32:677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert R, Turnbull P, Parry J, Kramer J (1981) Bacillus cereus and other bacillus species: their part in food poisoning and other clinical infections. In: Goodfellow M, Berkeley RCW (eds) The aerobic endospore-forming bacteria: classification and identification, 1st edn. Academic Press, London, pp 297–314Google Scholar
  14. Gupta T, Demokritou P, Koutrakis P (2004) Development and performance evaluation of a high-volume ultrafine particle concentrator for inhalation toxicological studies. Inhal Toxicol 16:851–862. doi:10.1080/08958370490506664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hejazi A, Falkiner FR (1997) Serratia marcescens. J Med Microbiol 46:903–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jose-Luis Sagripanti AB (1999) Bacterial spores survive treatment with commercial sterilants and disinfectants. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4255Google Scholar
  17. Jung WK, Koo HC, Kim KW et al (2008) Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of the silver ion in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2171–2178. doi:10.1128/AEM.02001-07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim SH, Woo KS, Liu BYH, Zachariah MR (2005) Method of measuring charge distribution of nanosized aerosols. J Colloid Interface Sci 282:46–57. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kincaid D, Longley T (1989) A water droplet evaporation and temperature model. Trans ASAE 32:457–463Google Scholar
  20. Komanapalli IR, Lau BHS (1998) Inactivation of bacteriophage k, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans by ozone. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:766–769. doi:10.1007/s002530051244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G (2006) How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 6:130. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kusumaningrum H (2003) Survival of foodborne pathogens on stainless steel surfaces and cross-contamination to foods. Int J Food Microbiol 85:227–236. doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00540-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R (2008) Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 4:26–49. doi:10.1002/smll.200700595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li K-Y, Tu H, Ray AK (2005) Charge limits on droplets during evaporation. Langmuir 21:3786–3794. doi:10.1021/la047973n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Linsebigler AL, Lu G, John T, Yates J (1995) Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem Rev 95:735–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339:520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luber P, Brynestad S, Topsch D et al (2006) Quantification of campylobacter species cross-contamination during handling of contaminated fresh chicken parts in kitchens. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:66–70. doi:10.1128/AEM.72.1.66-70.2006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maloney MJ, Wray BB, DuRant RH et al (1987) Effect of an electronic air cleaner and negative ionizer on the population of indoor mold spores. Ann Allergy 59:192–194Google Scholar
  29. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V et al (1999) Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 5:607–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nielsen J, Maus C, Rzesanke D, Leisner T (2011) Charge induced stability of water droplets in subsaturated environment. Atmos Chem Phys 11:2031–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Osseiran N, Hartl G (2006) WHO | Almost a quarter of all disease caused by environmental exposure. In: World Health Organization. Accessed 11 Jan 2012Google Scholar
  32. Pradeep AT (2009) Noble metal nanoparticles for water purification: a critical review. Thin Solid Films 517:6441–6478. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A (2009) Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv 27:76–83. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rayleigh LFRS (1882) On the equilibrium of liquid conducting masses charged with electricity. Philos Mag 14:184–186Google Scholar
  35. Redmond EC, Griffith CJ, Slader J, Humphrey TJ (2004) Microbiological and observational analysis of cross contamination risks during domestic food preparation. Br Food J 106:581–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rusin P, Maxwell S, Gerba C (2002) Comparative surface-to-hand and fingertip-to-mouth transfer efficiency of gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and phage. J Appl Microbiol 93:585–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rutala WA, Weber DJ (2001) Surface disinfection: should we do it? J Hosp Inf 48:S64–S68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rutala WA, Weber DJ (2008) Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008. cdcgov 158Google Scholar
  39. Salton MR, Kim K-S (1996) Structure. In: Baron S (ed) Medical microbiology, 1st edn. University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, pp 37–54Google Scholar
  40. Sato T, Koizumi Y, Taya M (2003) Photocatalytic deactivation of airborne microbial cells on TiO2-loaded plate. Biochem Eng J 14:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scott E (1999) Hygiene issues in the home. Am J Infect Control 27:S22–S25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seto T, Maekawa T, Osone S et al. (2012) Formation of highly charged nanodroplets by condensation–electrospray device. Chem Eng Sci 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2012.01.062
  43. Shimokage T, Saimoto M, Okumoto S et al (2005) Method of analyzing components in fine water droplets generated by electrostatic atomization. MEW Tech Rep 53:11–16Google Scholar
  44. Taflin DC, Ward TL, Davis EJ (1989) Electrified droplet fission and the Rayleigh limit. Langmuir 5:376–384. doi:10.1021/la00086a016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tang K, Gomez A (1994) Generation of monodisperse water droplets from electrosprays in a corona-assisted cone-jet mode. J Colloid Interface Sci 25:1237–1249Google Scholar
  46. Thurman RB, Gerba CP, Bitton G (1989) The molecular mechanisms of copper and silver ion disinfection of bacteria and viruses. Crit Rev Environ Control 18:295–315. doi:10.1080/10643388909388351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. US Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Bacillus subtilis final risk assessment. http://wwwepagov/oppt/biotech/pubs/fra/fra009htm. Accessed 2 May 2012
  48. Wilm M (2011) Principles of electrospray ionization. Mol Cell Proteomics 10: M111.009407. doi:10.1074/mcp.M111.009407
  49. World Health Organization (2008) Foodborne disease outbreaks: guidelines for investigation and control. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamauchi T, Suda H, Matsui Y (2007) Development of home appliances using electrostatic atomization. J Aerosol Res 22:5–10Google Scholar
  51. Yamauchi T, Maekawa T, Seto T et al (2008) Analysis of the number of charge in the fine water droplets produced by electrostatic atomization. Earozoru Kenkyu 23:108–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgios Pyrgiotakis
    • 1
  • James McDevitt
    • 1
  • Toshiyuki Yamauchi
    • 2
  • Philip Demokritou
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Nanotechnology and NanotoxicologyHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  2. 2.Panasonic Corporation, Appliances CompanyKusatsu CityJapan

Personalised recommendations