Synthesis of Fe–Ni bimetallic nanoparticles from pixel target ablation: plume dynamics and surface characterization

  • Xiaoxu Niu
  • Paul T. Murray
  • Andrew Sarangan
Research Paper


A novel Fe–Ni bimetallic nanoparticle synthesis technique, denoted pixel target ablation, is reported. The technique entails ablating a thin film target consisting of patterned Fe and Ni pixels with a selected ratio using a KrF excimer laser. The laser energy breaks a known amount of target materials into metal atoms, which then form nanoparticles by recombination in the gas phase. Due to the nature of thin-film ablation, splashing of large particles was eliminated with the added benefit of minimizing nanoparticle agglomeration. Plume dynamics and surface characterizations were carried out to exploit the formation of Fe–Ni nanoparticles more fully. The composition was readily controlled by varying the initial relative amount of Fe and Ni target pixels. Synthesis of multi-element nanoparticles by pixel target ablation should be possible with any element combination that can be prepared as a thin-film target.


Laser ablation Thin film Bimetallic Nanoparticle Iron Nickel Pixel target ablation Multi-element nanoparticle formation 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. Eunsung Shin, Dr. Tyson Back, and Neal Pierce, and many thanks to the group members of nano-fab lab at University of Dayton, Piyush Shah, Jian Gao, Zhi Wu and Alex Watson, for their problem solving suggestions.


  1. Blanton TN (1995) JCPDS, International Centre for Diffraction Data round robin study of silver behenate. A possible low-angle X-ray diffraction calibration standard. Powder Diffr 10:91Google Scholar
  2. Bulgakova NM, Bulgakov AV (2001) Pulsed laser ablation of solids: transition from normal vaporization to phase explosion. Appl Phys A 73:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gates BC, Guczi I, Knbzinger H (1986) Stud Surf Sci Catal 648Google Scholar
  4. Gerenser LJ, Lee ST (1977) Electronic structure of catalytic metal clusters studied by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 39Google Scholar
  5. Haruta M (1997) Size- and support-dependency in the catalysis of gold. Catal Today 36:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang Y, Zhou X, Liao J, Liu C, Lu T, Xing W (2008) Preparation of Pd/C catalyst for formic acid oxidation using a novel colloid method. Electrochem Commun 10:621–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kawaguchi T, Sugimoto W, Murakami Y, Takasu Y (2005) Particle growth behavior of carbon-supported Pt, Ru, PtRu catalysts prepared by an impregnation reductive-pyrolysis method for direct methanol fuel cell anodes. J Catal 229:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Link S, Wang ZL, El-Sayed MA (1999) Alloy formation of gold silver nanoparticles and the dependence of the plasmon absorption on their composition. J Phys Chem B 103:3529–3533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miotello A, Kelly R (1995) Critical assessment of thermal models for laser sputtering at high fluences. Appl Phys Lett 67:3535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD (1992) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a reference book of standard spectra for identification and interpretation of XPS data. Perkin-Elmer, PrairieGoogle Scholar
  11. Murray PT, Shin E (2008) Formation of silver nanoparticles by through thin film ablation. Mater Lett 62:4336–4338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Murray PT, Shin E (2009) Thin film, nanoparticle, and nanocomposite fabrication by through thin film ablation. Proc SPIE 7404:74040F-8Google Scholar
  13. Musaev OR, Sutter EA, Wrobel JM, Kruger MB (2012) Au, Ge, and AuGe nanoparticles fabricated by laser ablation. J Nanopart Res 14:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Park K, Han D, Sung Y (2006) PtRh alloy nanoparticle electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction for use in direct methanol fuel cells. J Power Sources 163:82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shin KS, Kim JH, Kim IH, Kim K (2012) Novel fabrication and catalytic application of poly(ethylenimine)-stabilized gold–silver alloy nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 14:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shultz MJ (2002) Chemistry for engineers. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Somorjai GA (1981) Chemistry of two dimensions: surfaces. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Stamenkovic VR, Fowler B, Mun BS, Wang G, Ross PN, Lucas CA, Markovic NM (2007) Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni(111) via increased surface site availability. Science 315:493–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Timp GL (1999) Nanotechnology 696Google Scholar
  20. Xiao M, Wang L, Huang X, Wu Y, Dang Z (2009) Synthesis and characterization of WO3/titanate nanotubes nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic properties. J Alloy Compd 470:486–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yuan Y, Asakura K, Wan H, Tsai K, Iwasawa Y (1996) Supported gold catalysts derived from gold complexes and as-precipitated metal hydroxides, highly active for low-temperature CO oxidation. Chem Lett 25:756Google Scholar
  22. Zhang X, Chan K (2003) Water-in-oil microemulsion synthesis of platinum–ruthenium nanoparticles, their characterization and electrocatalytic properties. Chem Mater 15:459Google Scholar
  23. Zhu J, Somorjai GA (2000) Formation of platinum silicide on a platinum nanoparticle array model catalyst deposited on silica during chemical reaction. Nano Lett 1:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Materials Engineering ProgramUniversity of DaytonDaytonUSA
  2. 2.Research InstituteUniversity of DaytonDaytonUSA
  3. 3.Electro-Optics DepartmentUniversity of DaytonDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations