Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, Volume 13, Issue 12, pp 7229–7245 | Cite as

Research on bimodal particle extinction coefficient during Brownian coagulation and condensation for the entire particle size regime

Research Paper

Abstract

The extinction coefficient of atmospheric aerosol particles influences the earth’s radiation balance directly or indirectly, and it can be determined by the scattering and absorption characteristics of aerosol particles. The problem of estimating the change of extinction coefficient due to time evolution of bimodal particle size distribution is studied, and two improved methods for calculating the Brownian coagulation coefficient and the condensation growth rate are proposed, respectively. Through the improved method based on Otto kernel, the Brownian coagulation coefficient can be expressed simply in powers of particle volume for the entire particle size regime based on the fitted polynomials of the mean enhancement function. Meanwhile, the improved method based on Fuchs–Sutugin kernel is developed to obtain the condensation growth rate for the entire particle size regime. And then, the change of the overall extinction coefficient of bimodal distributions undergoing Brownian coagulation and condensation can be estimated comprehensively for the entire particle size regime. Simulation experiments indicate that the extinction coefficients obtained with the improved methods coincide fairly well with the true values, which provide a simple, reliable, and general method to estimate the change of extinction coefficient for the entire particle size regime during the bimodal particle dynamic processes.

Keywords

Extinction coefficient Particle size distribution Time evolution Bimodal distribution Aerosols Modeling and simulation 

References

  1. Barrett JC, Jheeta JS (1996) Improving the accuracy of the moments method for solving the aerosol general dynamic equation. J Aerosol Sci 8:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett JC, Webb NA (1998) A comparison of some approximate methods for solving the aerosol general dynamic equation. J Aerosol Sci 1–2:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binkowski FS, Shankar U (1995) The regional particulate matter model 1. Model description and preliminary results. J Geophys Res 12:26191–26209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohrend CF, Huffman R (1998) Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Efendiev Y, Struchtrup H, Luskin M, Zachariah MR (2002) A hybrid sectional-moment model for coagulation and phase segregation in binary liquid nanodroplets. J Nanopart Res 4:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garca-Nieto PJ (2002) Study of visibility degradation due to coagulation, condensation, and gravitational settling of the atmospheric aerosol. Aerosol Sci Technol 36:814–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeong JI, Choi M (2004) A bimodal moment model for the simulation of particle growth. J Aerosol Sci 9:1071–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jung CH, Kim YP (2006) Numerical estimation of the effects of condensation and coagulation on visibility using the moment method. J Aerosol Sci 2:143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jung CH, Kim YP (2007) Particle extinction coefficient for polydispersed aerosol using a harmonic mean type general approximated solution. Aerosol Sci Technol 11:994–1001Google Scholar
  10. Jung CH, Kim YP (2008) Theoretical study on the change of the particle extinction coefficient during the aerosol dynamic processes. J Aerosol Sci 10:904–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jung CH, Kim YP, Lee KW (2002) Simulation of the influence of coarse mode particles on the properties of fine mode particles. J Aerosol Sci 8:1201–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalani A, Christofides PD (2002) Simulation, estimation and control of size distribution in aerosol processes with simultaneous reaction, nucleation, condensation and coagulation. Comput Chem Eng 7–8:1153–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaskaoutis DG, Kambezidis HD (2006) Investigation into the wavelength dependence of the aerosol optical depth in the Athens area. Q J R Meteorol Soc 620:2217–2234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar J, Peglow M, Warnecke G, Heinrich S (2008) An efficient numerical technique for solving population balance equation involving aggregation, breakage, growth and nucleation. Powder Technol 1:81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee KW, Chen H, Gieseke JA (1984) Log-normally preserving size distribution for Brownian coagulation in the free-molecule regime. Aerosol Sci Technol 1:53–62Google Scholar
  16. Megaridis CM, Dobbins RA (1990) A bimodal integral solution of the dynamic equation for an aerosol undergoing simultaneous particle inception and coagulation. Aerosol Sci Technol 2:240–255Google Scholar
  17. Otto E, Fissan H, Park SH, Lee KW (1999) The log-normal size distribution theory of Brownian aerosol coagulation for the entire particle size range: part II—analytical solution using Dahneke’s coagulation kernel. J Aerosol Sci 1:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park SH, Lee KW (2000a) Moment method of log-normal size distribution for coagulation problem: constant collision kernel mode. Part Sci Technol 4:293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Park SH, Lee KW (2000b) Condensational growth of polydisperse aerosol for the entire particle size range. Aerosol Sci Technol 3:222–227Google Scholar
  20. Peglow M, Kumar J, Warnecke G, Heinrich S, Mörl L (2006) A new technique to determine rate constants for growth and agglomeration with size- and time-dependent nuclei formation. Chem Eng Sci 1:282–292Google Scholar
  21. Pratsinis SE (1988) Simultaneous nucleation, condensation, and coagulation in aerosol reactors. J Colloid Interface Sci 2:416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sandu A, Borden C (2003) A framework for the numerical treatment of aerosol dynamics. Appl Numer Math 4:475–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsang TH, Brock JR (1983) Simulation of condensation aerosol growth by condensation and evaporation. Aerosol Sci Technol 3:311–320Google Scholar
  24. Whitby ER, McMurry PH (1997) Modal aerosol dynamics modeling. Aerosol Sc Technol 6:673–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wiscombe WJ (1980) Improved Mie scattering algorithms. Appl Opt 9:1505–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu MZ, Lin JZ, Jin HH, Ying J (2011) The verification of the Taylor-expansion moment method for the nanoparticle coagulation in the entire size regime due to Brownian motion. J Nanopart Res 13:2007–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and ControlZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.College of Metrology & Measurement EngineeringChina Jiliang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations