Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, Volume 13, Issue 9, pp 3741–3754 | Cite as

U(VI) reduction by Fe(II) on hematite nanoparticles

  • Hui Zeng
  • Daniel E. GiammarEmail author
Research Paper


Nanoscale size effects on U(VI) reduction by Fe(II) on hematite were investigated with four aerosol-synthesized hematite nanoparticles (12, 30, 50, 125 nm) and one aqueous-synthesized hematite (70 nm). Batch experiments were conducted at loadings of 0.01 mM U(VI) and 5 mM Fe(II) at pH 7.5 and 9.0. Rate constants for reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) were determined using a pseudo-first order reaction rate law. Reduction was faster at pH 7.5 than at pH 9.0. Rate constants were higher for aerosol-synthesized hematite than for aqueous-synthesized hematite. Rate constants were not significantly different for the 30, 50, and 125 nm particles. However, reduction was two orders of magnitude faster for the 12 nm hematite particles. Possible explanations for the dramatically faster reduction with the 12 nm hematite include the formation of a more reactive solid such as magnetite, effects on electron conduction through hematite, and quantum confinement effects.


Nanoparticles Hematite Uranium reduction Adsorption Environmental remediation Aerosols 



This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (BES 0608749). The Center for Materials Innovation at Washington University provided supplemental support. Dr. Soubir Basak and Manoranjan Sahu in Dr. Pratim Biswas’ Aerosol and Air Quality Research Laboratory at Washington University provided the aerosol-synthesized hematite nanoparticles. Zimeng Wang performed selected control experiments. The valuable comments of four anonymous reviewers were helpful in revising this manuscript.


  1. Anschutz AJ, Penn RL (2005) Reduction of crystalline iron(III) oxyhydroxides using hydroquine: influence of phase and particle size. Geochem Trans 6:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behrends T, Van Cappellen P (2005) Competition between enzymatic and abiotic reduction of uranium(VI) under iron reducing conditions. Chem Geol 220:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin MM, Sletten RS, Bailey RP, Bennett T (1996) Sorption and filtration of metals using iron-oxide-coated sand. Water Res 30:2609–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyanov MI, O’Loughlin EJ, Roden EE, Fein JB, Kemner KM (2007) Adsorption of Fe(II) and U(VI) to carboxyl-functionalized microspheres: the influence of speciation on uranyl reduction studied by titration and XAFS. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:1898–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brus LE (1983) A simple model for the ionization potential, electron affinity, and aqueous redox potential of small semiconductor crystallites. J Chem Phys 79:5566–5571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catalano JG, Fenter P, Park C, Zhang Z, Rosso KM (2010) Structure and oxidation state of hematite surfaces reacted with aqueous Fe(II) at acidic and neutral pH. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:1498–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen LX, Liu T, Thurnauer MC, Csencsits R, Rajh T (2002) Fe2O3 nanoparticle structures investigated by X-ray absorption near-edge structure, surface modifications, and model calculations. J Phys Chem B 106:8539–8546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng K, He YP, Miao YM, Zou BS, Wang YG, Wang TH, Zhang XT, Du ZL (2006) Quantum size effect on surface photovoltage spectra: alpha-Fe2O3 nanocrystals on the surface of monodispersed silica microsphere. J Phys Chem B 110:7259–7264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chernyshova IV, Hochella MF Jr, Madden AS (2007) Size-dependence structural transformations of hematite nanoparticles. 1. Phase transition. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:1736–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornell RM, Schwertmann U (1997) The iron oxides. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Cwiertny DM, Handler RM, Schaefer MV, Grassian VH, Scherer MM (2008) Interpreting nanoscale size-effects in aggregated Fe-oxide suspensions: reaction of Fe(II) with goethite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:1365–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao Y, Wahi R, Kan AT, Falkner JC, Colvin VL, Tomson MB (2004) Adsorption of cadmium on anatase nanoparticles—effect of crystal size and pH. Langmuir 20:9585–9593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giammar DE, Maus CJ, Xie LY (2007) Effects of particle size and crystalline phase on lead adsorption to titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Environ Eng Sci 24:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Handler RM, Beard BL, Johnson CM, Scherer MM (2009) Atom exchange between aqueous Fe(II) and goethite: an Fe isotope tracer study. Environ Sci Technol 43:1102–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He YT, Wan JM, Tokunaga T (2008) Kinetic stability of hematite nanoparticles: the effect of particle sizes. J Nanopart Res 10:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ilton ES, Boily JF, Buck EC, Skomurski FN, Rosso KM, Cahill CL, Bargar JR, Felmy AR (2010) Influence of dynamical conditions on the reduction of U-VI at the magnetite-solution interface. Environ Sci Technol 44:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jang JH, Dempsey BA, Burgos WD (2008) Reduction of U(VI) by Fe(II) in the presence of hydrous ferric oxide and hematite: effects of solid transformation, surface coverage, and humic acid. Water Res 42:2269–2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeon BH, Dempsey BA, Burgos WD, Barnett MO, Roden EE (2005) Chemical reduction of U(VI) by Fe(II) at the solid-water interface using natural and synthetic Fe(III) oxides. Environ Sci Technol 39:5642–5649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korgel BA, Monbouquette HG (1997) Quantum confinement effects enable photocatalyzed nitrate reduction at neutral pH using Cds nanocrystals. J Phys Chem B 101:5010–5017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larese-Casanova P, Scherer MM (2007) Fe(II) sorption on hematite: new insights based on spectroscopic measurements. Environ Sci Technol 41:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leussing DL, Kolthoff IM (1953) The solubility product of ferrous hydroxide and the ionization of the aquo-ferrous ion. J Am Chem Soc 75:2476–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liger E, Charlet L, Van Cappellen P (1999) Surface catalysis of uranium(VI) reduction by iron(II). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:2939–2955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Madden AS, Hochella MF (2005) A test of geochemical reactivity as a function of mineral size: manganese oxidation promoted by hematite nanoparticles. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madden AS, Hochella MF, Luxton TP (2006) Insights for size-dependent reactivity of hematite nanomineral surfaces through Cu2+ sorption. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:4095–4104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McMillin BK, Biswas P, Zachariah MR (1996) In situ characterization of vapor phase growth of iron oxide-silica nanocomposites.1. 2-D planar laser-induced fluorescence and Mie imaging. J Mater Res 11:1552–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Monticone S, Tufeu R, Kanaev AV, Scolan E, Sanchez C (2000) Quantum size effect in TiO2 nanoparticles: does it exist? Appl Surf Sci 162–163:565–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nano GV, Strathmann TJ (2008) Application of surface complexation modeling to the reactivity of iron(II) with nitroaromatic and oxime carbamate contaminants in aqueous TiO2 suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 321:350–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Payne TE, Lumpkin GR, Waite TD (1998) Uranium(VI) adsorption on model minerals: controlling factors and surface complexation. In: Jenne EA (ed) Adsorption of metals by Geomedia. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossetti R, Nakahara S, Brus LE (1983) Quantum size effects in the redox potentials, resonance Raman spectra, and electronic spectra of CdS crystallites in aqueous solution. J Chem Phys 79:1086–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosso KM, Yanina SV, Gorski CA, Larese-Casanova P, Scherer MM (2010) Connecting observations of hematite (α-Fe2O3) growth catalyzed by Fe(II). Environ Sci Technol 44:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rustad JR, Felmy AR (2005) The influence of edge sites on the development of surface charge on goethite nanoparticles: a molecular dynamics investigation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:1405–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schecher WD, McAvoy DC (2001) MINEQL+: a chemical equilibrium modeling system version 4.5 for Windows. Environmental Research Software, Hallowell, MEGoogle Scholar
  33. Scott TB, Allen GC, Heard PJ, Randell MG (2005) Reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) on the surface of magnetite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:5639–5646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Serpone N, Lawless D, Khairutdinov R (1995) Size effects on the photophysical properties of colloidal anatase TiO2 particles: size quantization or direct transitions in this indirect semiconductor? J Phys Chem B 99:16646–16654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine—a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Anal Chem 42:779–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Toyoda T, Tsuboya I (2003) Apparent band-gap energies of mixed TiO2 nanocrystals with anatase and rutile structures characterized with photoacoustic spectroscopy. Rev Sci Instrum 74:782–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waite TD, Davis JA, Payne TE, Waychunas GA, Xu N (1994) Uranium(VI) adsorption to ferrihydrite—application of a surface complexation model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:5465–5478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waychunas GA, Kim CS, Banfield JF (2005) Nanoparticulate iron oxide minerals in soils and sediments: unique properties and contaminant scavenging mechanisms. J Nanopart Res 7:409–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wersin P, Hochella MF Jr, Persson P, Redden G, Leckie JO, Harris DW (1994) Interaction between aqueous uranium(VI) and sulfide minerals: spectroscopic evidence for sorption and reduction. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:2829–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams AGB, Scherer MM (2004) Spectroscopic evidence for Fe(II)-Fe(III) electron transfer at the iron oxide-water interface. Environ Sci Technol 38:4782–4790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan B, Wrenn BA, Basak S, Biswas P, Giammar DE (2008) Microbial reduction of Fe(III) in hematite nanoparticles by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Environ Sci Technol 42:6526–6531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yanina SV, Rosso KM (2008) Linked reactivity at mineral-water interfaces through bulk crystal conduction. Science 320:218–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zeng H, Singh A, Basak S, Ulrich KU, Sahu M, Biswas P, Catalano JG, Giammar DE (2009) Nanoscale size effects on uranium(VI) adsorption to hematite. Environ Sci Technol 43:1373–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical EngineeringWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Center for Materials InnovationWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.TLC EnviroTechDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations