Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 111–120

Use of an electrical aerosol detector (EAD) for nanoparticle size distribution measurement

Nanoparticles and Occupational Health

Abstract

Recently, Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM, TSI model 3550) and EAD (EAD, TSI Model 3070A) have been commercially available to measure the integral parameters (i.e., total particle surface area and total particle length) of nanoparticles. By comparison, the configuration of the EAD or NSAM is similar to that of electrical mobility analyzer of the early generation for particle size distribution measurement. It is therefore possible to use the EAD or NSAM as a particle sizer. To realize the objective of using the EAD as a sizer, we characterized the average electrical charges of monodisperse particles passing through the EAD particle charger and ion trap set at voltages ranging from 20 to 2500 V. The average charge data collected at different ion-trap voltages were then summarized by the empirical correlation using the parameter of Zp*V, where Zp is the particle electrical mobility and V is the ion-trap voltage. A data-reduction scheme was further proposed to retrieve the size distribution of sampled particles from the EAD readout at different ion-trap voltages. In the scheme, the functional format of each mode in a number size distribution of particles was assumed as log-normal, but the number of modes in an entire size distribution is not limited. A criterion was used to best fit the simulated EAD readouts with experimental ones by varying the count median diameter (CMD), geometric standard deviation (σg), and total particle number (Nt) of each mode in a particle size distribution. Experiments were performed to verify the proposed scheme.

Keywords

Nanoparticle sizer Electrical aerosol detector Nanoparticle surface area monitor EAD unipolar charger Nanotechnology Occupational health EHS 

References

  1. Donaldson K, Li XY, MacNee W (1998) Ultrafine (nanometer) particle mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 29(5–6):553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fissan H, Trampe A, Neunman S, Pui DYH, Shin WG (2007) Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposition area. J Nanoparticle Res 9:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gleiter H (1989) Nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 33:223–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hinds W (1999) Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Keskinen J, Pietarinen K, Lehtimaki M (1992) Electrical Low Pressure Impactor. J Aerosol Sci 23:353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knutson EO, Whitby KT (1975) Aerosol classification by electric mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications. J Aerosol Sci 6:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin SJ, Granstaff VE, Frye GC (1991) Characterisation of a quartz crystal microbalance with simultaneous mass and liquid loading. Anal Chem 63:2272–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Oberdörster G (1996) Significance of particle parameters in the evaluation of exposure-dose–response relationships of inhaled particles. Part Sci Technol 14(2):135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Invited review: nanotechnology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113(7):823–839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Park D, Kim S, An M, Hwang J (2007a) Real-time measurement of submicron aerosol particles having a log-normal size distribution by simultaneously using unipolar diffusion charger and unipolar field charger. J Aerosol Sci 38:1240–1245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Park D, An M, Hwang J (2007b) Development and performance test of a unipolar diffusion charger for real-time measurements of submicron aerosol particles having a log-normal size distribution. J Aerosol Sci 38(4):420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Patashnick H, Rupprecht EG (1991) Continuous PM–10 measurements using the tapered element oscillating microbalance. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 41:1079–1083Google Scholar
  13. Scheibel HG, Porstendorfer J (1983) Generation of monodisperse Ag and NaCl aerosol with particle diameters between 2 and 300 nm. J Aerosol Sci 14:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stoltzenburg MR, McMurry PH (1991) An ultrafine aerosol condensation nucleus counter. Aerosol Sci Technol 14:48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilson WE, Han HS, Stanek J, Turner J, Chen DR, Pui DYH (2004) Use of electrical aerosol detector as an indicator for the total particle surface area deposited in the lung. Symposium on air quality measurement methods and technology sponsored by the Air and Waste Management Association. Research Triangle Park, NC. Paper #37Google Scholar
  16. Woo KS, Chen DR, Pui DYH, Wilson WE (2001) Use of continuous measurements of integral aerosol parameters to estimate particle surface area. Aerosol Sci Technol 34:57–65Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical EngineeringWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental and Occupational HealthMedical College, National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations