Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 83–113

Reassessing crosslinguistic variation in clausal comparatives

Article

Abstract

This paper looks at one area of potential crosslinguistic variation in comparatives. It has recently been claimed that Japanese clausal comparatives lack degree abstraction structures in the complement of yori ‘than’. Based on data from several empirical domains such as predicative adjectival comparatives, intensional contexts, and negative islands, this paper shows that Japanese clausal comparatives do not in general contrast with their English counterparts in the way predicted by the above claim. The syntactic and semantic phenomena observed in Japanese clausal comparatives receive straightforward accounts if we assume that they do involve degree abstraction and degree comparison, along the lines familiar from analyses of their English counterparts.

Keywords

Comparatives Clausal comparatives Degree comparison Japanese 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aihara, Masahiko. 2007. Japanese superlative constructions: Evidence for ‘est’-movement. In Proceedings of NELS 37, 1 Vol, 87–100. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  2. Bale, Alan Clinton. (2008) A universal scale of comparison. Linguistics and Philosophy 31: 1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, Chris. (2007) Parasitic scope. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 407–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, Sigrid, Sveta Krasikova, Daniel Fleischer, Remus Gergel, Stefan Hofstetter, Christiane Savelsberg, John Vanderelst, and Elisabeth Villalta. 2009. Crosslinguistic variation in comparison constructions. In Linguistic variation yearbook 9, ed. Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Johan Rooryck, 1–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, Sigrid. Toshiko Oda, Koji Sugisaki. (2004) Parametric variation in the semantics of comparison: Japanese vs. English. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 289–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Shoichi Takahashi. 2007. Direct comparisons: Resurrecting the direct analysis of phrasal comparatives. In Proceedings of SALT 17, 19–36. Ithaca: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Shoichi Takahashi. 2008. When to reduce and when not to: Crosslinguistic variation in phrasal comparatives, handout for talk at GLOW 31, Newcastle University, March 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Shoichi Takahashi. 2011. Reduced and unreduced phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. doi:10.1007/s11049-011-9137-1.
  9. Fox, Danny. (2000) Economy and semantic interpretation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Gajewski, Jon. 2009. More on quantifiers in comparative clauses. In Proceedings of SALT 18, ed. Tova Friedman and Satoshi Ito, 340–357. Ithaca: CLC Publications. http://hdl.handle.net/1813/13043.
  11. Graves, Edward. 2011. The Korean kes construction: An asymmetry in syntax. Honours thesis, McGill University.Google Scholar
  12. Hayashishita, J.-R. 2009. Yori-comparatives: A reply to Beck et al. (2004). Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18: 65–100.Google Scholar
  13. Heim, Irene. (1985) Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  14. Heim, Irene. 2001. Degree operators and scope. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, ed. Caroline Féry and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 214–239. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Heycock, Caroline. Anthony, Kroch. (1999) Pseudocleft connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 365–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Higgins, Francis Roger. 1973. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Published by Garland, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  17. Ishii, Yasuo. 1991. Operators and empty categories in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantification in natural languages, ed. Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara H. Partee, 451–486. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Doctoral dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  20. Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Modes of comparison. In Proceedings of CLS 43, ed. Malcolm Elliott, James Kirby, Osamu Sawada, Eleni Staraki, and Suwon Yoon, 141–165. Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  21. Kennedy, Christopher. Jason Merchant. (2000) Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 89–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennedy, Christopher, and Jason Stanley. 2009. What an average semantics needs. In SALT 18, ed. Tova Friedman and Satoshi Ito, 465–482. Ithaca: Cornell University. http://hdl.handle.net/1813/13050.
  23. Kikuchi, Akira. 1987. Comparative deletion in Japanese. Ms., Yamagata University.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, Min-Joo. 2004. Event-structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  25. Krasikova, Sveta. 2008. Comparison in Chinese. In Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 7: Papers from CSSP 2007, ed. Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr, 263–281. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss7.
  26. Lechner, Winfried (2001) Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 683–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin, Jo-wang. (2009) Chinese comparatives and their implicational parameters. Natural Language Semantics 17: 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nissenbaum, Jon. 2000. Investigations of covert phrase movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  29. Oda, Toshiko. 2008. Degree constructions in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
  30. Pancheva, Roumyana. 2006. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Slavic. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 14: The Princeton meeting, ed. J. Lavine, S. Franks, M. Tasseva-Kurktchieva, and H. Filip, 236–257. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  32. Schwarzschild, Roger. (2008) The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 308–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharvit, Yael. (1999) Connectivity in specificational sentences. Natural Language Semantics 7: 299–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snyder, William, Kenneth Wexler, and Dolon Das. 1995. The syntactic representation of degree and quantity: Perspectives from Japanese and child English. In Proceedings of WCCFL 13, 581–596. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Sudo, Yasutada. 2009. Invisible degree nominals in Japanese clausal comparatives. In Proceedings of the 5th workshop on Altaic formal linguistics, ed. Reiko Vermeulen and Ryosuke Shibagaki, 285–295. Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
  36. Sung, Minji. 2011. Comparative constructions in Korean with two types of -kes constructions. Ms., McGill University.Google Scholar
  37. von Stechow, Arnim. (1984) Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiang, Ming. 2003. A phrasal analysis of Chinese comparatives. In Proceedings of CLS 39, 739–754. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  39. Xiang, Ming. 2005. Some topics in comparative constructions. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations