Aloni, M. 2007. Expressing ignorance or indifference. Modal implicatures in BiOT. In Logic, language, and computation, 6th international Tbilisi symposium on logic, language, and computation, ed. B. ten Cate and H. Zeevat, 1–20. Heidelberg.
Aloni, M., and R. van Rooij. 2004. Free choice items and alternatives. In Proceedings of the KNAW academy colloquium: Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 5–26.
Alonso-Ovalle, L., and P. Menéndez-Benito. 2003. Some epistemic indefinites. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 33, ed. M. Kadowaki and S. Kawahara, 1–21. Amherst, MA: GLSA
Alonso-Ovalle, L., P. Menéndez-Benito, and F. Schwarz. (to appear). Two types of definite determiners and maximize presupposition. In Proceedings of NELS 39. Amherst, MA.
Becker, M. 1999. The some indefinites. In UCLA working papers in linguistics, ed. G. Storto, 1–13.
Chierchia G. (2006) Broaden your views. Implicatures of domain widening and the ‘logicality’ of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37(4): 535–590Google Scholar
Chierchia, G., D. Fox, and B. Spector. (to appear). The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In Handbook of Semantics, ed. P. Portner, C. Maienborn, and K. von Heusinger, Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
Ciucivara, O. S. 2007. Oarecare indefinites and free choice in Romanian. In Pitar Moş: A building with a view. Papers in honor of Alexandra Cornilescu, ed. G. Alboiu, A. Avram, L. Avram, and D. Isac, 205–225. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii Bucuresţi.
Condoravdi, C. 2005. Not knowing or caring who. Ms., PARC and Stanford University.
Cooper R. (1983) Quantification and syntactic theory. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
Dayal, V. 1997. Free relatives and ever. Identity and free choice readings. In Proceedings of SALT VII, ed. A. Lawson, 99–116. Ithaca, NY.
Dayal V. (1998) Any as inherently modal. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 433–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D., and P. Jacobson. 1989. Agreement as a semantic phenomenon. In ESCOL 88, ed. J. Powers and F. de Jong, 95–101. Ithaca.
Etxebarria, U., and A. Giannakidou. 2007. Contextual restrictions and the definite determiner. Talk presented at the conference ‘Context-dependence, perspective and relativity in language and thought’, Paris, November 9–11.
Farkas, D. F. 2002. Varieties of indefinites. In Proceedings of SALT 12, ed. B. Jackson, 59–83. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Farkas, D. 2006. Free choice in Romanian. In Drawing the boundaries of meaning, Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, ed. B. J. Birner and G. Ward, 71–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, A. 2004. Domain restriction and the arguments of quantificational determiners. In Proceedings of SALT 14, 110–128. Ithaca, NY.
Heim, I. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, ed. A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich, 487–535. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Heim, I. 2007. Person and number on bound and partially bound pronouns. Ms., MIT.
Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, P. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantification in Natural Languages, ed. A. K. Emmon Bach, E. Jelinek, and B. H. Partee, 451–486. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kadmon, N., and F. Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy
16: 353–422.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. 2007. Specificity and the speaker’s belief. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.
Karttunen L. (1973) Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 47: 169–193Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 2003. Indefinites and functional heads: From Japanese to Salish. Talk given at SALT 13, May 2003, University of Washington, Seattle.
Kratzer, A. 2005. Indefinites and the operators they depend on: From Japanese to Salish. In Reference and quantification: The Partee effect, ed. G. N. Carlson and F. Pelletier, 113–142. Stanford: CSLI.
Kratzer, A., and J. Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, ed. Y. Otsu, 1–25. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Martí L. (2007) Restoring indefinites to normalcy: An experimental study on the scope of Spanish Algunos. Journal of Semantics 24(1): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martí, L. 2009. Contextual restrictions on indefinites: Spanish algunos and unos. In Quantification, definiteness and nominalization, Vol. 22 of Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics, ed. A. Giannakidou and M. Rathert, 108–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matthewson L. (2001) Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics 2(9): 145–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menéndez-Benito, P. 2005. The grammar of choice. Amherst, MA: GLSA. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Percus, O. 2006. Antipresuppositions. In Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora: Toward the extablishment of generative grammar as an empirical science, 52–73. Report of the Grantin-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Project No. 15320052, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Potts C. (2005) Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Potts, C. 2007. Conventional implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss, 475–501. Oxford University Press.
Quer J. (2000) Licensing free choice items in hostile environments: The role of aspect and mood. SKY Journal of Linguistics 13: 251–268Google Scholar
Sauerland, U. 2003a. Implicated presuppositions. Handout, conference on polarity, scalar phenomena, and implicatures, University of Milan-Bicocca, June 2003.
Sauerland, U. 2003b. A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of SALT 13, ed. R. Youn and Y. Zhou, 258–275. Ithaca.
Schwarzschild R. (2002) Singleton indefinites. Journal of Semantics 19(3): 289–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson P. (1974) Subject and predicate in logic and grammar. Methuen and Co, Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
Tovena L.M., Jayez J. (2006) Epistemic determiners. Journal of Semantics 23(3): 217–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tredinnick, V. A. 2005. On the semantics of free relatives with -ever. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
van der Sandt R. (1992) Presuposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9(4): 333–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, K. 1999a. Quantifier domain selection and pseudo-scope. Paper presented at the Cornell conference on context-dependence, Cornell University, March 28.
von Fintel, K. 1999b. Whatever. Class notes, 24.979 Topics in Semantics, Spring 1999, MIT.
von Fintel, K. 2000a. Singleton indefinites (Schwarzschild 2000). Ms., MIT.
von Fintel, K. 2000b. Whatever. In Proceedings of SALT 10, ed. B. Jackson and T. Matthews, 27–40. Ithaca, NY.
von Fintel, K. 2003. Pragmatics: Notes on presupposition. Class notes, MIT.
von Fintel K., Gillies A.S. (2008) CIA leaks. The Philosophical Review 117(1): 77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, K., and A. S. Gillies. 2008b. Might made right. Unpublished ms., MIT, to appear in a volume on epistemic modality, ed. Andy Egan and Brian Weatherson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Rooij R. (2006) Free choice counterfactual donkeys. Journal of Semantics 23(4): 383–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanovich, I. 2005. Choice-functional series of indefinite pronouns and Hamblin semantics. In Proceedings of SALT 15, ed. E. Georgala and J. Howell, 309–326. Ithaca, NY.
Zabbal, Y. 2004. A compositional semantics of the French expression N’Importe. Ms., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Zamparelli, R. 2007. On singular existential quantifiers in Italian. In Existence: Semantics and syntax, ed. I. Comorovski and K. von Heusinger, 293–328. Springer.
Zimmermann T.E. (2001) Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics 8: 255–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar