Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 359–372 | Cite as

On bishops and donkeys

Article

Abstract

The problem of indistinguishable participants is a well-known problem for D-type theories of donkey pronouns. Recently, Paul Elbourne has offered a D-type theory that purports to dissolve the problem of indistinguishable participants. I argue against Elboune’s solution.

Keywords

Anaphora D-type theory E-type theory Situation semantics Presupposition 

References

  1. Barwise J., Perry J. (1983) Situations and attitudes. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Elbourne P. (2005) Situations and individuals. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans G. (1977) Pronouns, quantifiers, and relative clauses (I). Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 467–536Google Scholar
  4. Evans G. (1980) Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 37–362Google Scholar
  5. Heim I. (1990) E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 137–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kratzer A. (1989) An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 607–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations