Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 131–166 | Cite as

Imperatives in conditional conjunction

Article

Abstract

This paper provides evidence for an ambiguity of bare VPs in the English conditional conjunction construction. This ambiguity, undetected by previous researchers, provides a key to the development of a compositional semantic analysis of conditional conjunction with imperative first conjuncts. The analysis combines existing semantic theories of imperatives, the future tense, modal subordination, and speech act conjunction to yield the correct semantics without further stipulation.

Keywords

Conditional coordination Imperatives Modality Speech acts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bolinger, D. (1967). The imperative in English. In M. Halle, H. Lunt, & H. McLean (Eds.), To honour Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday (pp. 335–362).Google Scholar
  2. The Hague: Mouton. Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (pp. 39–103). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clark B. (1993). Relevance and ‘pseudo-imperatives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(1): 79–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Copley, B. (2002). The semantics of the future. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Culicover P. (1970). One more can of beer. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 366–369Google Scholar
  6. Culicover P.W., Jackendoff R. (1997). Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2): 195–217Google Scholar
  7. Davies E.E. (1979). Some restrictions on conditional imperatives. Linguistics 17, 1039–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies E.E. (1986). The English imperative. London, Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
  9. Franke, M. (2005). Pseudo-imperatives. Master’s thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1990). Dynamic Montague Grammar. Technical Report LP-90-02, Institute for Language, Logic and Information, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Hamblin C.L. (1987). Imperatives. London, Blackwell PublishersGoogle Scholar
  12. Han C.-H. (2000). The structure and interpretation of imperatives. New York, GarlandGoogle Scholar
  13. Huntley M. (1984). The semantics of English imperatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 7(2): 103–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kratzer A. (1991a). Conditionals. In von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds). Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 651-656Google Scholar
  15. Kratzer A. (1991b). Modality. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds). Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 639-650Google Scholar
  16. Krifka M. (2001). Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics 9(1): 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis D.K. (1975). Adverbs of quantification. In Keenan E.L. (ed). Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-15Google Scholar
  18. Linebarger M.C. (1987). Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 10(3): 325–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mastop, R. J. (2005). What can you do? Imperative mood in semantic theory. PhD dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  20. Partee B., Rooth M. (1983) Generalized quantifiers and type ambiguity. In Bäuerle R., Schwarze C., von Stechow A. (eds). Meaning, use, and interpretation of language. Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 361-383Google Scholar
  21. Portner, P. (2004). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In K. Watanabe & R. Young (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14. Ithaca, NY: CLC.Google Scholar
  22. Potsdam E. (1998). Syntactic issues in the English imperative. New York, GarlandGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts C. (1989). Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(6): 683–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Russell, B. (2005). Conditional coordination. Manuscript, Brown University.Google Scholar
  25. Schmerling, S. F. (1980). On the syntax and semantics of English imperatives. Manuscript, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  26. Thomason R.H. (1970). Indeterminist time and truth-value gaps. Theoria 36, 246–281Google Scholar
  27. van der Auwera J. (1986). Conditionals and speech acts. In Traugott E., ter Meulen A., Reilly J. (eds). On conditionals. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 197-214Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive and Linguistic SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations