Advertisement

Two paths to polysynthesis

Evidence from West Circassian nominalizations
  • Ksenia ErshovaEmail author
Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

West Circassian displays prominent polysynthetic morphology both in the verbal and nominal domains and both syntactic categories are subject to the same morphological ordering constraints. I argue that despite these similarities, nominal and verbal wordforms in West Circassian are in fact constructed via two distinct word formation processes: while the verbal root and any accompanying functional morphology are pronounced as a single phonological word by virtue of forming a single complex syntactic head via head displacement, the nominal head and its modifiers are pronounced as a single word due to rules of syntax-to-prosody mapping. Such a division of labor provides an account for why only nouns, and not verbs, exhibit productive noun incorporation in the language: West Circassian noun incorporation is prosodic, rather than syntactic. The evidence for the existence of these two avenues of word formation comes from a systematic violation of morpheme ordering observed in verbal nominalizations. In terms of broader theoretical impact, the proposed analysis provides insight into what factors shape a polysynthetic language: while it is tempting to reduce polysynthetic morphology to either simple head displacement or just a consequence of mapping complex syntactic structure to a single phonological word without any head displacement, the West Circassian data show that neither of these mechanisms can be dispensed with.

Keywords

Polysynthesis Head displacement Prosodification Wordhood Phases Noun incorporation West Circassian 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the speakers of West Circassian for sharing their language, especially Svetlana K. Alishaeva, Saida Gisheva, Susana K. Khatkova, and Zarema Meretukova. I am grateful to Jason Merchant, Neil Myler, Boris Harizanov, Maziar Toosavardani, the audiences at the Morphology and Syntax Workshop at the University of Chicago and LSA 2018 for comments and discussion, Greg Kobele for comments on previous versions of this work, and especially Karlos Arregi. The trip to the village Neshukay in July 2014 was organized by the Higher School of Economics and the Russian State University for the Humanities in Moscow. I am grateful to the participants of the 2014 expedition, especially Yury Lander. I would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers and the editor Daniel Harbour for very useful comments and suggestions. This project was partially funded by the Graduate Research Aid Initiative in Linguistics from the University of Chicago and the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies Dissertation Research Grant. All mistakes and shortcomings are my own.

References

  1. Ackema, Peter, and Ad Neeleman. 2004. Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, David, Daniel Harbour, and Laurel J. Watkins. 2009. Mirrors and microparameters: Phrase structure beyond free word order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Variation, change and phonological theory, eds. Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout, and W. Leo Wetzels, 35–68. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 1–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arkadiev, Peter. 2016. From resultative to incipient passive in Circassian. Paper presented at Valency and valency change in the Caucasus, HSE, Moscow. Google Scholar
  6. Arkadiev, Peter M., and Yakov G. Testelets. 2009. O trex čeredovanijax v adygejskom jazyke [On three alternations in Adyghe]. In Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka [Aspects of polysynthesis: Sketches on the grammar of Adyghe], ed. Yakov G. Testelets, 121–145. Moscow: RGGU. Google Scholar
  7. Arkadiev, Peter M., and Yakov G. Testelets. 2015. On the structure of nominal constructions in West Circassian. Paper presented at 48th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Google Scholar
  8. Arkadiev, Peter M., Yury A. Lander, Alexander B. Letuchiy, Nina R. Sumbatova, and Yakov G. Testelets. 2009. Vvedenije. Osnovnyje svedenija ob adygejskom jazyke [Introduction: Basic information on Adyghe]. In Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka [Aspects of polysynthesis: Sketches on the grammar of Adyghe], ed. Yakov G. Testelets, 17–120. Moscow: RGGU. Google Scholar
  9. Arregi, Karlos, and Andrew Nevins. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arregi, Karlos, and Asia Pietraszko. 2018. Generalized head movement. Proceedings of the LSA 3: 5–115.  https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3il.4285. Google Scholar
  11. Baker, Mark. 2009. Is head movement still needed for noun incorporation? Lingua 199: 148–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baker, Mark. 2014. On dependent ergative case (in Shipibo) and its derivation by phase. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 341–379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baker, Mark C. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415. Google Scholar
  14. Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  15. Baker, Mark C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  16. Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barrie, Michael, and Eric Mathieu. 2016. Noun incorporation and phrasal movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 1–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bennett, Ryan, Emily Elfner, and James McCloskey. 2016. Lightest to the right: An apparently anomalous displacement in Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 47: 169–234. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt. Google Scholar
  20. Boeckx, Cedric, and Sandra Stjepanović. 2001. Head-ing towards PF. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (2): 345–355. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. PhD diss., MIT. Google Scholar
  22. Caponigro, Ivano, and Maria Polinsky. 2011. Relative embeddings: A Circassian puzzle for the syntax/semantics interface. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(1): 71–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chernyshev, Alexander. 2014. Obrazovanije nominalizacij v bžedugskom dialekte adygejskogo jazyka [Formation of nominalizations in the Bzhedug dialect of Adyghe]. Expedition report. Google Scholar
  24. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  25. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  26. Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  27. Clemens, Lauren Eby. 2014. Prosodic noun incorporation and verb-initial syntax. PhD diss., Harvard. Google Scholar
  28. Clemens, Lauren Eby, and Jessica Coon. 2018. Deriving verb initial word order in Mayan. Language 94: 237–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Compton, Richard, and Christine Pittman. 2010. Word-formation by phase in Inuit. Lingua 120: 2167–2192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Deal, Amy Rose. 2010. Ergative case and the transitive subject: A view from Nez Perce. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 73–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Elfner, Emily. 2015. Recursion in prosodic phrasing: Evidence from Connemara Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 1169–1208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elfner, Emily. 2018. The syntax-prosody interface: Current theoretical approaches and outstanding questions. Linguistics Vanguard 4: 1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gerasimov, Dmitry V., and Yury A. Lander. 2008. Reljativizacija pod maskoj nominalizacii i faktivnyj argument v adygejskom jazyke [Relativization under the mask of nominalization and factive argument in the adyghe language]. In Issledovanija po glavol’noj derivacii [Studies on verbal derivation], eds. Vladimir A. Plungian and Sergei G. Tatevosov, 290–313. Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskix Kul’tur. Google Scholar
  36. Giusti, Giuliana. 2002. The functional structure of noun phrases: A bare phrase structure approach. In Functional structure in DP and IP, 54–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  37. Gorbunova, Irina M. 2009. Possessivnye konstrukcii [Possessive constructions]. In Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka [Aspects of polysynthesis: Sketches on the grammar of Adyghe], ed. Yakov G. Testelets, 146–165. Moscow: RGGU. Google Scholar
  38. Gordon, Matthew, and Ayla Applebaum. 2010. Prosodic fusion and minimality in Kabardian. Phonology 27 (1): 45–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20, eds. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  40. Harley, Heidi. 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vp. In Quantification, definiteness and nominalization, eds. Monika Rathert and Anastasia Giannakidou, 320–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  41. Harley, Heidi. 2010. Affixation and the mirror principle. In Interfaces in linguistics, eds. Raffaela Folli and Christiane Ullbricht, 166–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  42. Harley, Heidi. 2013. Getting morphemes in order: Merger, affixation, and head movement. In Diagnosing syntax, eds. Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng and Norbert Corver, 44–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Inkelas, Sharon, and Cheryl Zoll. 2007. Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45: 133–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1999. The phonological lexicon. In The handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Natsuko Tsujimura, 62–100. London: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  45. Ito, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2013. Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124: 20–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2 (1). Google Scholar
  47. Kishimoto, Hideko. 2006. Japanese syntactic nominalization and VP-internal syntax. Lingua 116: 771–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The syntax of verb-movement: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar
  49. Koopman, Hilda, and Anna Szabolsci. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Korotkova, Natalia, and Yury Lander. 2010. Deriving affix ordering in polysynthesis: Evidence from Adyghe. Morphology 20: 299–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kumakhov, Mukhadin, and Karina Vamling. 2009. Circassian clause structure. In Caucasus studies 1: School of International Migration and Ethnic Relations. Malmö: Malmö University. Google Scholar
  52. Lander, Yury. 2009. Subject properties of the Adyghe absolutive: Evidence from relatives. Ms., RAS Moscow. Google Scholar
  53. Lander, Yury. 2012a. Nominal complexes in Adyghe: Between morphology and syntax. Conference handout. Typology, Theory: Caucasus, IFEA, Istanbul. Google Scholar
  54. Lander, Yury. 2012b. Reljativizacija v polisintetičeskom jazyke: Adygejskie otnositel’nye konstrukcii v tipologičeskoj perspektive. PhD diss., Russian State University for the Humanities. Google Scholar
  55. Lander, Yury. 2016. Word-formation in Adyghe. In Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, eds. Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, and Franz Rainer, 3508–3526. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  56. Lander, Yury. 2017. Nominal complex in West Circassian: Between morphology and syntax. Studies in Language 41 (1): 76–98. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lander, Yury, and Irina Bagirokova. 2015. Two-faced subordination marker in West Circassian necessity constructions. Working papers by NRU HSE 38/LNG/2015. Google Scholar
  58. Lander, Yury, and Alexander Letuchiy. 2010. Kinds of recursion in Adyghe morphology. In Recursion and Human Language, ed. Harry van der Hulst, 263–284. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar
  59. Lander, Yury, and Nina Sumbatova. 2007. Adygejskie otricanija [Adyghe negation]. In Kavkazskij lingvističeskij sbornik, Vol. 18, 77–103. Moscow: Academia. Google Scholar
  60. Legate, Julie Anne. 2002. Warlpiri: Theoretical implications. PhD diss., MIT. Google Scholar
  61. Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 55–101.  https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Letuchiy, Alexander. 2010. Ergativity in the Adyghe system of valency-changing derivations. In Ergativity, valency and voice, eds. Gilles Authier and Katharina Haude, 323–353. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar
  63. Letuchiy, Alexander. 2013. Verb classes in Adyghe: Derivational vs. nonderivational criteria. Linguistics 51 (4): 729–766. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lieber, Rochelle. 1983. Argument linking and compounds in English. Linguistic Inquiry 14 (2): 251–285. Google Scholar
  65. Lochbihler, Bethany. 2017. Syntactic domain types and PF effects. In The structure of words at the interfaces, eds. Heather Newell, Máire Noonan, Glyne Piggott, and Lisa Demena Travis, 74–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  66. Marantz, Alec. 2000. Case and licensing. In Arguments and case: Explaining Burzio’s Generalization, ed. Eric Reuland, 11–30. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word formation, 2nd edn. Munich: CH Beck. Google Scholar
  68. Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19 (1): 153–197. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In MIT occasional papers in linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, eds. Jill Beckman, Laura Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 249–384. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  70. Müller, Gereon. 2004. Verb-second as vP-first. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7: 139–274. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland Press. Google Scholar
  72. Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-based morphology and phonology: With special attention to Optimality Theory. PhD diss., UC Berkeley. Google Scholar
  73. Orgun, Cemil Orhan, and Sharon Inkelas. 2002. Reconsidering bracket erasure. In Yearbook of morphology 2001, eds. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 115–146. Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17: 237–274. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pensalfini, Rob. 2004. Towards a typology of configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22 (2): 359–408. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 2006. Subject clitics and complex inversion. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, Vol. 4, 601–659. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Potsdam, Eric, and Maria Polinsky. 2012. Backward raising. Syntax 15(1): 75–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  79. Richards, Norvin. 2016. Contiguity theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roberts, Ian. 2011. Head movement and the minimalist program. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, ed. Cedric Boeckx, 195–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  81. Rogava, Giorgi V., and Zain ab Keraševa. 1966. Grammatika adygejskogo jazyka [The grammar of Adyghe]. Krasnodar: Krasnodarskoe Knižnoe Isdatelstvo. Google Scholar
  82. Sabbagh, Joseph. 2014. Word order and prosodic structure constraints in Tagalog. Syntax 17: 40–89. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1981. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Nordic prosody, ed. Thorstein Fretheim, 111–140. Trondheim: TAPIR. Google Scholar
  84. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  85. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1996. The prosodic structure of function words. In Signal to syntax: Prosodic bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, eds. James L. Morgan and Katherine Demuth, 187–214. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  86. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface, 2nd edn. In The handbook of phonological theory, eds. John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan Yu. Hoboken: Wiley–Blackwell. Google Scholar
  87. Serdobolskaya, Natalia. 2009. Vtoroje buduš’eje, infinitiv, masdar i supin v adygejskom jazyke: argumenty za i protiv jedinoj traktovki [Second future, infinitive, masdar and supinum in Adyghe: Pro and contra their unification]. In Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka [Aspects of polysynthesis: Sketches on the grammar of Adyghe], ed. Yakov G. Testelets, 454–497. Moscow: RGGU. Google Scholar
  88. Smeets, Henricus Joannes. 1984. Studies in West Circassian phonology and morphology. Munich: Lincom Europa. Google Scholar
  89. Smeets, Henricus Joannes. 1992. On valencies, actants and actant coding in Circassian. In Caucasian perspectives, ed. George Hewitt, 98–144. Munich: Lincom Europa. Google Scholar
  90. Smith, Jennifer L. 2011. Category-specific effects. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, eds. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume, and Keren Rice, 2439–2463. Hoboken: Wiley–Blackwell. Google Scholar
  91. Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In The syntactic structure of Hungarian, eds. Ferenc Kiefer and Katalin É. Kiss, 179–274. Cambridge: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  92. Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. PhD diss., MIT. Google Scholar
  93. Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (2): 219–255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vydrin, Arseniy. 2008. Are there depictives in Adyghe? In Secondary predicates in Eastern European languages and beyond, eds. Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel, and Winfried Boeder, 424–445. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky-Universität. Google Scholar
  95. Watanabe, Akira. 1996. Case-absorption and wh-agreement. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wojdak, Rachel. 2008. The linearization of affixes: Evidence from Nuu-chah-nulth. Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations