Advertisement

The diachronic syntax of negated adjuncts in English

  • Richard Ingham
  • Susagna TubauEmail author
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the diachronic changes in negation and Emphatic Focus that are responsible for the distribution of negated adjuncts in Present Day English. These can occur clause-medially and clause-initially, but generally not clause-finally. While clause-initial negated adjuncts move to the left-periphery triggering Negative Inversion for emphasis, clause-medial negated adjuncts are argued to occur in their first-merged position as vP-adjuncts. We relate the inability of clause-final negated adjuncts to express sentential negation to the loss of Prosodic-movement and Negative Concord in the transition from Late Middle English to Early Modern English. The eventual loss of Negative Concord is related to the reanalysis of negative words from non-negative (i.e. [uNeg]) to negative (i.e. [iNeg]). Upon loss of Prosodic-movement, reanalysis of negative words as [iNeg] results in the rise of Negative Inversion to express Focus.

Keywords

Negated adjuncts Negative inversion Negative concord Prosodic-movement Focus Late Middle English 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by two research grants awarded by the Spanish Ministerio de Indústria, Economía y Competitividad (FFI2017-8254-P, FFI2016-81750-REDT), and by a grant awarded by the Generalitat de Catalunya to the Centre de Lingüística Teòrica (2017SGR634). We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and the handling editor for comments and suggestions on how to improve the manuscript. All errors remain our own.

References

  1. Baker, Carl Leroy. 1970. Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 169–186. Google Scholar
  2. Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts. 2011. Negative words and related expressions: a new perspective on some familiar puzzles. In The evolution of negation: Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, eds. Richard Ingham and Pierre Larrivée, 23–60. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  3. Bosque, Ignacio. 1980. Sobre la Negación. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra. Google Scholar
  4. Büring, Daniel. 2004. Negative inversion. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 35, eds. Leah Bateman and Cherlon Ussery, 1–20. University of Massachusetts: GLSA. Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–156. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–54. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  7. de Clercq, Karen. 2010. Neg-shift in English. Evidence from PP-adjuncts. In 12th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar. 2010 Movement in Minimalism, eds. Duh-Ho An and Soo-Yeon Kim. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing Company. Google Scholar
  8. Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Josep Quer. 1997. Two mechanisms for the licensing of negative indefinites. In Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America (FLSM) 6, eds. Leslie Gabriele, Debra Hardison, and Robert Westmoreland, 103–114. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Google Scholar
  9. Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haegeman, Liliane. 2001. Negative preposing, negative inversion and the split CP. In Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, eds. Laurence R. Horn and Yashiko Kato, 21–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  11. Haegeman, Liliane, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 1991. Negative heads and the NEG-criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herburger, Elena. 2001. The Negative concord puzzle revisited. Natural Language Semantics 9: 289–333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingham, Richard. 2005a. The loss of Neg V -> C in Middle English. Linguistische Berichte 202: 171–266. Google Scholar
  14. Ingham, Richard. 2005b. NegV1 and secondary negation in Old and Middle English religious prose. In York Papers in Linguistics 2(3), eds. Joanne Close, Alexandra Galani, Beck Sinar and Phillip Wallage, 29–49. University of York: Department of Language and Linguistic Science. Google Scholar
  15. Ingham, Richard. 2007. NegP and negated constituent movement. Transactions of the Philological Society 105: 1–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ingham, Richard. 2013. The syntax of negation in the history of English. In Negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, eds. David Willis, Christopher Lucas, and Anne Breitbarth, 119–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobsson, Bengt. 1951. Inversion in English. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell. Google Scholar
  18. Jack, George B. 1978a. Negation in Later Middle English Prose. Archivum Linguisticum 9: 58–72. Google Scholar
  19. Jack, George B. 1978b. Negative Concord in Early Middle English. Studia Neophilologica 50: 29–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development, and origin. London: Allen & Unwin. Google Scholar
  21. Kallel, Amel. 2007. The loss of negative concord in Standard English: Internal factors. Language Variation and Change 19: 27–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kallel, Amel. 2011. The loss of negative concord in Standard English: A case of lexical reanalysis. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Google Scholar
  23. Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In The structure of language, eds. Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold J. Katz, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  24. Labov, William. 1972. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48: 773–818. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ladusaw, William. 1992. Expressing negation. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 2, eds. Chris Barker and David Dowty. 237–259. Columbus: Ohio State University. Google Scholar
  26. Ladusaw, William. 1994. Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 4, eds. Mandy Harvey and Lynn Santelman. 220–229. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
  27. Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  28. Mazzon, Gabriella. 2004. A history of English negation. London: Longman. Google Scholar
  29. Müller, Gereon. 2004. Verb-second as vP-First. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7: 179–234. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nevalainen, Terttu. 1997. Recycling inversion: The case of initial adverbs and negators in Early Modern English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 31: 203–214. Google Scholar
  31. Nevalainen, Terttu, and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2003. Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar
  32. Penka, Doris. 2007. Negative indefinites. PhD diss., University of Tübingen. Google Scholar
  33. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–424. Google Scholar
  34. Richards, Norvin. 2016. Contiguity theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tottie, Gunnel. 1991. Negation in English speech and writing: A study in variation. London: Academic Press Limited. Google Scholar
  36. Tubau, Susagna. 2016. Lexical variation and negative concord in traditional dialects of British English. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19(2): 143–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tubau, Susagna, and Richard Ingham. 2015. Some historical notes on English negation: unethes, almost and hardly. In Studies in linguistic variation and change: From Old to Middle English, eds. Fabienne Toupin and Brian Lowrey, 215–226. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Google Scholar
  38. Wallage, Philip. 2012. Negative inversion, negative concord and sentential negation in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 16(1): 3–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. Syntactic properties of sentential negation: A comparative study of Romance languages. PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania. Google Scholar
  40. Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam. Google Scholar
  41. Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2012. There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29(3): 491–539. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 33. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English, Linguistics and Cultural Studies, School of HumanitiesUniversity of WestminsterLondonUK
  2. 2.Departament de Filologia Anglesa i de Germanística, Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres, Carrer de la FortunaUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations