Advertisement

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 265–308 | Cite as

Auxiliary vs INFL in Bantu

The syntactic and phonological complexity of Ndebele verbs
  • Asia Pietraszko
Article

Abstract

A distinctive property of Bantu verbs is the division into two domains: a cluster of inflectional prefixes (infl) and a lexical verb stem. This claim has been supported by a range of multidomain effects which single out infl as an independent constituent. Such effects led to the hypothesis that infl in Bantu is of the same category as auxiliary verbs found in auxiliary–participle constructions. This paper investigates syntactic, morphological and phonological complexity effects in Northern Ndebele verbs and concludes that infl in this language cannot be treated as a type of auxiliary. This conclusion is reached through a detailed comparison of infl and verbal auxiliaries, revealing striking asymmetries, syntactic and phonological, between the two. The autonomy of infl is argued to be a reflex of how verbal morphology is organized into complex heads in Bantu languages.

Keywords

Bantu Syntax Morphology Phonology Compound tenses Ndebele 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For valuable comments and discussion I would like to thank Karlos Arregi, Laura Downing, John Goldsmith, Brent Henderson, Deo Ngonyani, Galen Sibanda, Alan Yu and two anonymous NLLT reviewers. I am especially grateful to my Ndebele consultants: Lily Dubé, Galen Sibanda and Nkululeko Sibanda, and the University of Chicago Rella Cohn Fund donors for supporting this research.

References

  1. Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  2. Adger, David. 1997. VSO order and weak pronouns in Goidelic Celtic. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 42 (1–2): 9–29. Google Scholar
  3. Akmajian, Adrian, and Thomas Wasow. 1975. The constituent structure of VP and AUX and the position of the verb be. Linguistic Analysis 1: 205–245. Google Scholar
  4. Akmajian, Adrian, Susan M. Steele, and Thomas Wasow. 1979. The category AUX in universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10 (1): 1–64. Google Scholar
  5. Alboiu, Gabriela, and Peter Avery. 2009. Argument-adjunct asymmetries in Ndebele: The long and the short of it. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics. 1: 165–187. Google Scholar
  6. Baker, Mark. 2008. The syntax of agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett-Keach, Camillia N. 1980. The syntax and interpretation of the relative clause construction in Swahili. New York: Garland. Google Scholar
  8. Barrett-Keach, Camillia N. 1986. Word-internal evidence from Swahili for AUX/INFL. Linguistic Inquiry 17 (3): 559–564. Google Scholar
  9. Buell, Leston Chandler. 2005. Issues in Zulu verbal morphosyntax. PhD diss., University of California Los Angels. Google Scholar
  10. Carstens, Vicki. 2001. Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against φ-incompleteness. Syntax 4 (3): 147–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carstens, Vicki. 2005. Agree and EPP in Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23 (2): 219–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng, Lisa, and Laura J Downing. 2012. Against FocusP: Arguments from Zulu. In Contrasts and positions in Information Structure, eds. Ivona Kučerová and Ad Neeleman, 247–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Vol. 28 of Current studies in linguistics. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  15. Cook, Toni. 2013. The status of the macrostem in reduplication in Ndebele and Zulu. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 37: 46–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diercks, Michael. 2010. Agreement with subjects in Lubukusu. PhD diss., Georgetown University. Google Scholar
  17. Diercks, Michael. 2012. Parameterizing case: Evidence from Bantu. Syntax 15 (3): 253–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doke, Clement M. 1950. Textbook of Zulu grammar. Cape Town: Longmans, Green. Google Scholar
  19. Downing, Laura J. 1990. Local and metrical tone shift in Nguni. Studies in African Linguistics 21: 261–317. Google Scholar
  20. Downing, Laura J. 1999. Prosodic stem≠ prosodic word in Bantu. Studies on the phonological word 174: 73–98. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Vol. 60 of Linguistic monograph. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Embick, David, and Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture of blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39 (1): 1–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldsmith, John, Karen Peterson, and Joseph Drogo. 1989. Tone and accent in the Xhosa verbal system. Current approaches to African linguistics 5: 157–178. Google Scholar
  25. Goldsmith, John A. 1984. Tone and accent in Tonga. In Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone, eds. G. Nick Clements and John Goldsmith, 19–51. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar
  26. Goldsmith, John A. 1987. Tone and accent, and getting the two together. In Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS), eds. Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis, and Hana Filip. Vol. 13, 88–104. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Google Scholar
  27. Haddican, William. 2004. Sentence polarity and word order in Basque. The Linguistic Review. 21(2): 81–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halle, Morris. 1997. Impoverishment and fission. In PF: Papers at the interface, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, eds. Yoonjung Kang Benjamin Bruening and Martha McGinnis, Vol. 30, 425–450. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  29. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  30. Halpert, Claire. 2012. Argument licensing and agreement in Zulu. PhD diss., MIT. Google Scholar
  31. Harford, Carolyn. 2008. The Bantu-Romance connection in verb movement and verbal inflectional morphology. In The Bantu-Romance connection: A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs, and information structure, eds. Cécile De Cat and Katherine Demuth, 111–128. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henderson, Brent Mykel. 2003. PF evidence for phases and Distributed Morphology. In 34th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), eds. Keir Moulton and Matthew Wolf, 255–265. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  33. Henderson, Brent Mykel. 2006. The syntax and typology of Bantu relative clauses. PhD diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Google Scholar
  34. Henderson, Brent Mykel. 2013. Agreement and person in anti-agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 453–481. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hyman, Larry M. 1993. Conceptual issues in the comparative study of the Bantu verb stem. Vol. 4 of Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science series. Google Scholar
  36. Hyman, Larry M, and Al Mtenje. 1999. Prosodic morphology and tone: The case of Chichewa. In The prosody-morphology interface, eds. Harry van derHulst, René Kager, and Wim Zonnefeld, 90–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hyman, Larry M., Sharon Inkelas, and Galen Sibanda. 1999. Morphosyntactic correspondence in Bantu reduplication. In The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, eds. Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas, 173–310. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar
  38. Julien, Marit. 2002. Syntactic heads and word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  39. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  40. Khumalo, James Steven Mzilikazi. 1981. Zulu tonology. PhD diss., University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Google Scholar
  41. Khumalo, Langa. 2007. An analysis of the Ndebele passive construction. PhD diss., University of Oslo. Google Scholar
  42. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Google Scholar
  43. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1993a. Generalized alignment. Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1993b. Prosodic morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction, Technical Report #3, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Google Scholar
  45. Meeussen, Achille E. 1963. Morphotonology of the Tonga verb. Journal of African Languages 2(1): 72–92. Google Scholar
  46. Mutaka, Ngessimo M. 1994. The lexical tonology of Kinande, Vol. 1. Munich: Lincom Europa. Google Scholar
  47. Myers, Scott P. 1987. Tone and structure of the word in Shona. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts. Google Scholar
  48. Myers, Scott P. 1992. The morphology and phonology of INFL in Bantu. Ms., University of Texas at Austin. Google Scholar
  49. Myers, Scott P. 1998. Aux in Bantu morphology and phonology. In Theoretical aspects of Bantu tone, eds. Larry M. Hyman and Charles W. Kisseberth. Stanford: CSLI. Google Scholar
  50. Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar
  51. Ngonyani, Deo. 1999. X-movement in Kiswahili relative clause verbs. Linguistic Analysis 29 (1–2): 137–159. Google Scholar
  52. Pelling, James N. 1966. A practical Ndebele dictionary. Bulawayo: Daystar Publications. Google Scholar
  53. Peterson, Karen. 1985. Tone and accent in the Xhosa infinitive and present indicative. University of Chicago Working Papers in Linguistics. Google Scholar
  54. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Google Scholar
  55. Robinson, Christine. 2008. Agreement in Scottish Gaelic: A distributed morphology analysis. Master’s thesis, University College Dublin. Google Scholar
  56. Rycroft, David K. 1980. Ndebele and Zulu: Some phonetic and tonal comparisons. Zambezia 8: 109–128. Google Scholar
  57. Rycroft, David K. 1983. Tone-patterns in Zimbabwean Ndebele. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 46 (1): 77–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology 3 (1): 371–405. Google Scholar
  59. Sibanda, Galen. 2004. Verbal phonology and morphology of Ndebele. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley. Google Scholar
  60. Sietsema, Brian Mark. 1989. Metrical dependencies in tone assignment. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  61. Steele, Susan, Adrian Akmajian, Richard Demers, Eloise Jelinek, Chisato Kitagawa, Richard Oehrle, and Thomas Wasow. 1981. An encyclopedia of AUX: A study in cross-linguistic equivalence, Vol. 5 of Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  62. Wojdak, Rachel. 2007. The linearization of affixes: Evidence from Nuu-chah-nulth. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  63. Zeller, Jochen. 2013. In defence of head movement: Evidence from Bantu. In Diagnosing syntax. Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations