Advertisement

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 1–59 | Cite as

Samoan predicate initial word order and object positions

Article

Abstract

Verb-initial ordering may be derived by fronting the VP (or a larger constituent) to a specifier position higher than the subject. For VSO languages, this analysis requires that the object raise out of the VP to a position below the subject before the (remnant) VP fronts to the higher position. This paper builds a comprehensive analysis of VSO order in the Polynesian language Samoan, employing the VP-fronting analysis, arguing the account does better than competing derivational accounts (e.g., a head movement account). I argue that evidence for the raising of the complement of V to a VP-external position comes from data showing that the coordination of unaccusative and unergative verbs is not possible in Samoan. This paradigm has a ready explanation under the VP-fronting account: as the complement of V must raise out of the VP before VP-fronting takes place, unaccusative subject DPs are predicted to bind a VP-internal copy. This blocks coordination with unergative VPs which do not contain DP copies (via the Coordinate Structure Constraint). I provide a generalized account of DP movement whereby the functional head v is specified to trigger the movement of all DPs in its local c-command domain to its projected specifier positions. In cases where v does not locally c-command any DP, the requirement is trivially satisfied. I show how this accounts for the observed VSO/VOS word order alternations in Samoan.

Keywords

Word order Argument structure Coordination VP fronting Incorporation Little v Samoan Polynesian Austronesian 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Emily Sataua, Joey Zodiacal, Vince Schwenke-Enoka, and Fautua Tuamasaga Falefa for their time as native speaker consultants. Thanks also to Rajesh Bhatt, Dylan Bumford, William Foley, Vera Gribanova, Boris Harizanov, Beth Levin, Line Mikkelsen, Christopher Potts, Kristine Yu, three anonymous reviewers at NLLT and the editor Julie Anne Legate insightful comments. Earlier versions of this work were presented at the 89th Linguistics Society of America annual meeting (2014) and the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics at University of Southern California (2014). Thanks to the reviewers and audiences at these conferences for valuable comments. All errors are my own.

References

  1. Aldridge, Edith. 2002. Nominalization and wh-movement in Seediq and Tagalog. Language and Linguistics 3(2): 393–426. Google Scholar
  2. Aldridge, Edith. 2004. Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. PhD diss., Cornell University. Google Scholar
  3. Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parameterizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(3): 491–539. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alrenga, Peter. 2005. A sentential subject asymmetry in English and its implications for complement selection. Syntax 8(3): 175–207. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, Mark C. 1997. Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, Mark C. 2014. Pseudo noun incorporation as covert noun incorporation: Linearization and crosslinguistic variation. Language and Linguistics 15(1): 5–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball, Douglas. 2008. Clause structure and argument realization in Tongan. PhD diss., Stanford University. Google Scholar
  8. Barker, Chris, and Chung-Chieh Shan. 2014. Continuations and natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauer, Winifred, William Parker, and Te Kareongawai Evans. 1997. The Reed reference grammar of Māori. Auckland: Reed Books. Google Scholar
  10. Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and covert movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(2): 197–267. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3): 351–383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bošković, Željko, and Jairo Nunes. 2007. The copy theory of movement. In The copy theory of movement, eds. Norman Corver and Jairo Nunes, Vol. 107, 13–74. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broschart, Jürgen. 1997. Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 1(2): 123–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cable, Seth. 2012. The optionality of movement and EPP in Dholuo. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(3): 651–697. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calhoun, Sasha. 2015. The interaction of prosody and syntax in Samoan focus marking. Lingua 165: 205–229. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–233. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar
  18. Carnie, Andrew Hay. 1995. Non-verbal predication and head-movement. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  19. Carrier, Jill, and Janet H. Randall. 1992. The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2): 173–234. Google Scholar
  20. Chapin, Paul G. 1970. Samoan pronominalization. Language 46: 366–378. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  22. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  23. Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by phase. In MIT occasional papers in linguistics, Vol. 18. Cambridge: MIT, Department of Linguistics. Google Scholar
  24. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In MIT occasional papers in linguistics, Vol. 20. Cambridge: MIT, Department of Linguistics. Google Scholar
  25. Chung, Sandra. 1972. On conjunct splitting in Samoan. Linguistic Inquiry 3(4): 510–516. Google Scholar
  26. Chung, Sandra. 1978. Case marking and grammatical relations in Polynesian. Austin: University of Texas Press. Google Scholar
  27. Chung, Sandra. 1998. The design of agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  28. Chung, Sandra. 2005. What fronts: On the VP raising account of verb-initial order. In Verb-first: On the ordering of verb-initial languages, eds. Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Sheila Ann Dooley, 9–30. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chung, Sandra. 2006. Properties of VOS languages. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 685–720. Malden: Blackwell. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chung, Sandra. 2008. Indonesian clause structure from an Austronesian perspective. Lingua 118(10): 1554–1582. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chung, Sandra, and William Ladusaw. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  32. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  33. Clemens, Lauren Eby. 2014. Prosodic noun incorporation and verb-initial syntax. PhD diss., Harvard University. Google Scholar
  34. Clemens, Lauren Eby, and Maria Polinsky. to appear. VSO and VOS word order, primarily in Austronesian and Mayan languages, In The companion to syntax, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 2nd edn. Hoboken: Wiley–Blackwell. Google Scholar
  35. Cole, Peter, and Gabriella Hermon. 2008. VP raising in a VOS language. Syntax 11(2): 144–197. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Collins, James N. 2014. The distribution of unmarked cases in Samoan. In Argument realisations and related constructions in Austronesian languages. Papers from the 12th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, eds. I. Wayan Arka and N. L. K. Mas Indrawati, vol. 2, 93–110. Asia-Pacific Linguistics. Google Scholar
  37. Collins, James N. 2015. Samoan nominalization and ergativity. Ms., Stanford University. Google Scholar
  38. Collins, James N. to appear. Pseudo noun incorporation in discourse. In Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA) 20, ed. Joey Sabbagh. Google Scholar
  39. Davies, William D, and Stanley Dubinsky. 2001. Remarks on grammatical functions in transformational syntax. In Objects and other subjects, 1–19. Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Davis, Henry. 2005. Coordination and constituency in St’át’imcets (Lillooet Salish). In Verb first: On the syntax of verb-initial languages, eds. Andrew Hay Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Sheila Ann Dooley, 31–64. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Deal, Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12(4): 285–323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dikken, Marcel den. 1995. Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  43. Emonds, Joseph. 1972. Evidence that indirect object movement is a structure-preserving rule. Foundations of Language 8(4): 546–561. Google Scholar
  44. Emonds, Joseph E. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  45. Gazdar, Gerald. 1981. Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 155–184. Google Scholar
  46. Gribanova, Vera. 2009. Structural adjacency and the typology of interrogative interpretations. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1): 133–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Grinder, John T. 1969. Conjunct splitting in Samoan. University of California at San Diego, Department of Linguistics. Google Scholar
  48. Harizanov, Boris. 2014a. Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(4): 1033–1088. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harizanov, Boris. 2014b. On the mapping from syntax to morphophonology. PhD diss., UC Santa Cruz. Google Scholar
  50. Harley, Heidi. 2010. Affixation and the Mirror Principle. In Interfaces in linguistics, eds. Raffaella Folli and Christiane Ullbricht, 166–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  51. Harley, Heidi. 2013. External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 125: 34–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harley, Heidi. to appear. Getting morphemes in order: Merger, affixation and head-movement. In Diagnosing syntax, eds. Lisa Cheng and Norbert Cover. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  53. Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer. 1998. Mixed nominalizations, short verb movement and object shift in English. In North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 28, 143–157. Google Scholar
  54. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  55. Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small clause results. Lingua 74(2): 101–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hohaus, Vera, and Anna Howell. 2015. Alternative semantics for focus and questions: Evidence from Samoan. In Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA) XXI, eds. A. Camp et al. Google Scholar
  57. Hohepa, Patrick W. 1969. Not in English and kore and eehara in Māori. Te Reo 12: 1–34. Google Scholar
  58. Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9(4): 577–636. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  60. Ko, Heejeong, and Daeyong Sohn. to appear. Decomposing complex serialization: The role of v. Korean Linguistics. Google Scholar
  61. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1993. Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 99–148. Google Scholar
  62. Koster, Jan. 1978. Conditions, empty nodes, and markedness. Linguistic Inquiry. Google Scholar
  63. Kratzer, Angelika. 2005. Building resultatives. In Events in syntax, semantics, and discourse, eds. Claudia Maienbaum and Angelke Wollstein-Leisen, 177–212. Tubingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar
  64. Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. On pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern studies in English, eds. David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 160–186. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
  65. Lee, Felicia. 2000. VP remnant movement and VSO in Quiavini Zapotec. In The syntax of verb initial languages, 143–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  66. Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3): 506–515. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 55–101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Legate, Julie Anne. 2014. Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  70. Levinson, Lisa. 2010. Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(1): 135–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Massam, Diane. 2000. VSO and VOS: Aspects of Niuean word order. In The syntax of verb initial languages, eds. Andrew Carnie and Eithne Guilfoyle, 97–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  72. Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(1): 153–197. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Massam, Diane. 2005. Lexical categories, lack of inflection, and predicate fronting in Niuean. In Verb-first: On the ordering of verb-initial languages, eds. Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Sheila Ann Dooley, 227–242. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Massam, Diane. 2010. Deriving inverse order: The issue of arguments. In Austronesian and theoretical linguistics, eds. Raphael Mercado et al., 271–296. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Massam, Diane. 2013. Nuclear complex predicates in Niuean. Lingua 135: 56–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Massam, Diane, and Carolyn Smallwood. 1997. Essential features of predication in English and Niuean. In North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 27, ed. Kiyomi Kusumoto, 263–272. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  77. Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 69–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McCloskey, James. 2000. Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1): 57–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Medeiros, David J. 2013. Hawaiian VP-remnant movement: A cyclic linearization approach. Lingua 127: 72–97. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mercado, Raphael. 2002. Verb raising and restructuring in Tagalog. Master’s thesis, University of Toronto. Google Scholar
  81. Milner, George Bertram. 1966. Samoan dictionary. Auckland: Polynesian Press. Google Scholar
  82. Mosel, Ulrike. 2004. Complex predicates and juxtapositional constructions in Samoan. In Empirical approaches to language typology, 263–296. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar
  83. Mosel, Ulrike, and Even Hovdhaugen. 1992. Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. Google Scholar
  84. Mosel, Ulrike, and Ainslie So‘o. 1997. Say it in Samoan. Pacific Linguistics. Google Scholar
  85. Neeleman, Ad, and Fred Weerman. 1993. The balance between syntax and morphology: Dutch particles and resultatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11(3): 433–475. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. NSW Government. 2007. Faamatalaga mo Matua. http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/321111/brighterfutures_samoan.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2016.
  87. NSW Government. 2009. E faapefea ona matou fesoasoani. www.community.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/321247/hwh_samoan.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2016.
  88. Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  89. Otsuka, Yuko. 2005. Two derivations of VSO: A comparative study of Niuean and Tongan. In Verb first: On the syntax of verb-initial languages, eds. Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Sheila Ann Dooley, 65–90. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pearce, Elizabeth. 2002. VP versus V raising in Māori. In Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA) 8, eds. Andrea Rackowski and Norvin Richards, 225–240. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Google Scholar
  91. Pearson, Matthew. 2000. The clause structure of Malagasy: A minimalist approach. PhD diss., UCLA. Google Scholar
  92. Pearson, Matthew. 2007. Predicate fronting and constituent order in Malagasy. Ms., Reed College. Google Scholar
  93. Pearson, Matthew. 2013. Predicate raising and perception verb complements in Malagasy. Ms., Reed College. Google Scholar
  94. Perlmutter, David M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 4, 157–189. Berkeley. Google Scholar
  95. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry. Google Scholar
  96. Preminger, Omer. 2011. Agreement as a fallible operation. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  97. Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures, Vol. 68. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rackowski, Andrea, and Lisa Travis. 2000. V-initial languages: X or XP movement and adverbial placement. In The syntax of verb initial languages, eds. Andrew Carnie and Eithne Guilfoyle, 117–141. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  99. Ramchand, Gillian, and Peter Svenonius. 2002. The lexical syntax and lexical semantics of the verb-particle construction. In West coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL) 21, 387–400. Google Scholar
  100. Richards, Norvin. 1997. What moves where when in which language? PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  101. Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  102. Rijkhoff, Jan. 2003. When can a language have nouns and verbs? Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 35(1): 7–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Roberts, Ian. 1988. Predicative APs. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4): 703–710. Google Scholar
  104. Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  105. Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(4): 445–501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Samoa, Huko. 2015. Afamasagaofisa. https://afamasagaofisa.wordpress.com/. Accessed April 7, 2016.
  107. Seiter, William J. 1980. Studies in Niuean syntax. New York: Garland Publishing. Google Scholar
  108. Simpson, Jane. 1983. Resultatives. In Papers in Lexical-functional grammar, eds. Lori Levin, Malka Rappaport, and Annie Zaenen, 143–157. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Google Scholar
  109. Son, Minjeong, and Peter Svenonius. 2008. Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 27, eds. Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop, 388–396. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
  110. Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76(4): 859–890. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. State of Victoria. 2003. Faamatalaga mo Matua i Fualaau. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/health/samoan.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2016.
  112. Stau’s Music Center. 2011. Matou Te O Nei Ile Nu’u Paia. www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3EuLVRW7vQ. Accessed April 7, 2016.
  113. Svenonius, Peter. 2002. Subjects, expletives, and the EPP. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  114. Toivonen, Ida. 2000. The morphsyntax of Finnish possessives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(3): 579–609. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. University of Auckland: Libraries and Learning Services. 2016. ‘O Sina ma le ‘Ulafala. http://www.fagogo.auckland.ac.nz/content.html?id=1. Accessed April 7, 2016.
  116. Urk, Coppe van, and Norvin Richards. 2015. Two components of long-distance extraction: Successive cyclicity in Dinka. Linguistic Inquiry 46: 113–155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wechsler, Stephen. 1998. Resultative predicates and control. In Texas linguistic forum, Vol. 38, 307–322. Google Scholar
  118. Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinititives: Restructing and clause structure. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  119. Wurmbrand, Susi. 2015. Complex predicate formation via voice incorporation. In Approaches to complex predicates, eds. Léa Nash and Pollet Samvelian, 248–290. Leiden: Brill. Ms., University of Connecticut. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Yu, Kristine M. 2011. The sound of ergativity: Morphosyntax-prosody mapping in Samoan. In North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 39, eds. Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin, and Brian Smith, 825–838. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations