Advertisement

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 939–953 | Cite as

Event modifiers in (German) adjectival participles: remarks on Gehrke (this issue)

  • Andrew McIntyreEmail author
Article

Abstract

This commentary discusses four main claims about German adjectival participles made by Gehrke (this issue): (i) that events in adjectival participles are uninstantiated kinds, not tokens, (ii) that DPs in modifiers and by-phrases in participles are referentially opaque, (iii) that modifiers/by-phrases pseudo-incorporate into the participles, and (iv) that participle+modifier/by-phrase combinations refer to established (nameworthy) event-kinds. I defend claims (i)–(iii) in the face of potential counterevidence, but argue against claim (iv). I also motivate the generalisation that modifiers/by-phrases are licit only if they contribute to the description of the state expressed by the participle.

Keywords

Adjectival participles Event-kinds Pseudo-incorporation Modification By-phrases 

References

  1. Bouchard, Denis. 2011. Review of Guglielmo Cinque. The syntax of adjectives. Linguist List. www.linguistlist.org/issues/22/22-2513.html.
  2. Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 363–422. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frey, Werner. 2003. Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In Modifying Adjuncts, eds. Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn, and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, 163–209. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  4. Gehrke, Berit. 2012. Passive States. In Telicity, Change and State, eds. Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally, 185–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gehrke, Berit. this issue. Adjectival participles, event kind modification and pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Google Scholar
  6. Gese, Helga. 2011. Events in adjectival passives. In Sinn und Bedeutung, eds. Ingo Reich, Eva Horch, and Dennis Pauly, Vol. 15, 259–273. Münster: Monsenstein. Google Scholar
  7. Gese, Helga. 2012. Empirische Studien zum Zustandspassiv. Doctoral thesis, University of Tübingen. Google Scholar
  8. Jacobs, Joachim. 1993. Integration. In Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur, ed. Marga Reis, 63–116. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar
  9. Jacobs, Joachim. 1999. Informational Autonomy. In Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives, eds. Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, 56–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  10. Massam, Diane. 2009. Noun Incorporation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 1–21. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maienborn, Claudia. 2001. On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 9: 191–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maienborn, Claudia. 2011. Strukturausbau am Rande der Wörter: adverbiale Modifikatoren beim Zustandspassiv. In Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, eds. Stefan Engelberg, Anke Holler, and Kristel Proost, 317–343. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  13. Maienborn, Claudia, and Sascha Geldermann. 2013. ‘Expertengeprüft’ und ‘vom Experten geprüft’. In Interfaces of Morphology, ed. Holden Härtl, 127–161. Berlin: Academie. Google Scholar
  14. McIntyre, Andrew. 2013. Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In Non-Canonical Passives, eds. Artemis Alexiadou and Florian Schäfer, 21–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meltzer-Asscher, Aya. 2011. Adjectival passives in Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 815–855. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Öztürk, Balkiz. 2009. Incorporating agents. Lingua 119: 334–358. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rapp, Irene. 1997. Partizipien und semantische Struktur. Tübingen: Stauffenburg. Google Scholar
  18. Roßdeutscher, Antje. 2000. Lexikalisch gestützte formale Textinterpretation. Habilitation thesis, Universität Stuttgart. Google Scholar
  19. Schlücker, Barbara. 2005. Event-related modifiers in German adjectival passives. In Sinn und Bedeutung, eds. Emar Maier, Corien Bary, and Janneke Huitink, Vol. 9, 417–430. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics. Google Scholar
  20. Ward, Gregory, Richard Sproat, and Gail McKoon. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67: 439–474. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humboldt-Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations