Case in Sakha: are two modalities really necessary?
- 463 Downloads
Baker and Vinokurova (2010) argue that the distribution of morphologically observable case in Sakha (Turkic) requires a hybrid account, which involves recourse both to configurational rules of case assignment (Bittner and Hale 1996; Marantz 1991; Yip et al. 1987), and to case assignment by functional heads (Chomsky 2000, 2001). In this paper, we argue that this conclusion is under-motivated, and present an alternative account of case in Sakha that is entirely configurational. The central innovation lies in abandoning Chomsky’s (2000, 2001) assumptions regarding the interaction of case and agreement, and replacing them with Bobaljik’s (2008) and Preminger’s (2011) independently motivated alternative, nullifying the need to appeal to case assignment by functional heads in accounting for the Sakha facts.
KeywordsSyntax Morphology Sakha Turkic Case Agreement Case-competition
We are grateful to Sabine Iatridou, David Pesetsky, and Norvin Richards, to audiences at MIT’s Syntax Square and at the 2012 annual meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (LAGB 2012), and to three anonymous reviewers, for helpful discussion and comments. Additional thanks to the editor, and one of the reviewers, for their help with structuring and streamlining the presentation. All errors are our own.
- Baker, Mark C. 2012b. Types of crosslinguistic variation in case assignment. Ms., Newark, NJ: Rutgers University. http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~mabaker/barcelona-case-theory-paper.pdf.
- Baker, Mark C., and Nadya Vinokurova. 2013. On tense and copular verbs in nonverbal predications in Sakha. Ms., Newark, NJ, Yakutsk: Rutgers University, and North-Eastern Federal University. http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~mabaker/tense-and-copulas-Sakha.pdf.
- Bittner, Maria, and Ken Hale. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68. Google Scholar
- Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi theory: phi-features across interfaces and modules, eds. Daniel Harbour, David Adger, and Susana Béjar, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar
- Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: a life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero, and Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Deal, Amy Rose. 2014. to appear. Ergativity. In Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, eds. Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
- Dunn, John Asher. 1979. A reference grammar for the Coast Tsimshian language. Ottawa, ON: National Museums of Canada, National Museum of Man, Mercury Series, Canadian Ethnology Service Paper No. 55. Google Scholar
- Harizanov, Boris. 2014. Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. Google Scholar
- Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8), eds. German Westphal, Benjamin Ao, and Hee-Rahk Chae, 234–253. Ithaca: CLC Publications. Google Scholar
- McFadden, Thomas. 2004. The position of morphological case in the derivation: a study on the syntax-morphology interface. Doctoral dissertation, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania. Google Scholar
- Moravcsik, Edith A. 1974. Object-verb agreement. In Working papers on language universals, Vol. 15, 25–140. Google Scholar
- Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. Agreement. In Universals of human language IV: syntax, ed. Joseph H. Greenberg, 331–374. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
- Preminger, Omer. 2011. Agreement as a fallible operation. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT. Google Scholar
- Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and language design. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in language: interactions and architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Perspectives on phrase structure: heads and licensing, ed. Susan D. Rothstein, 37–62. San Diego: Academic Press. Google Scholar
- Ritter, Elizabeth. 1992. Cross-linguistic evidence for number phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 197–218. Google Scholar
- Vinokurova, Nadya. 2005. Lexical categories and argument structure: a study with reference to Sakha. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series: UiL-OTS. Google Scholar