The subjective mode of comparison: Metalinguistic comparatives in Greek and Korean

  • Anastasia GiannakidouEmail author
  • Suwon Yoon


In this paper, we present a striking parallel between Greek and Korean in the formation and interpretation of metalinguistic comparatives. The initial observation is that both languages show an empirical contrast between ordinary and metalinguistic comparatives realized in two places: (a) in the form of a designated metalinguistic comparative MORE, and (b) in the form of THAN employed. We propose (building on earlier ideas in Giannakidou and Stavrou 2009; Giannakidou and Yoon 2009) that the metalinguistic comparative is subjective and attitudinal, i.e. it introduces the point of view of an individual towards a sentence—and argue that the individual expresses invariably an attitude of preference: she prefers one sentence (the sentence itself, or the proposition it expresses) in a given context over another. The preference may come out as completely negative in certain cases, and this is manifested as yet another MORE lexicalization in Korean (charari), which selects nuni-THAN, which itself carries a negative expressive index (in the sense of Potts 2007b), we will claim. Expressive negativity is not equivalent to negation in syntax, as nuni alone cannot license NPIs that need negation.

If our analysis is correct, it has one important implication that goes beyond just the metalinguistic comparatives in the individual languages we are considering. It allows the generalization that metalinguistic functions in language are indeed part of the grammar. In particular, they are reflexes of grammaticalization of perspective and subjective mode, on a par with predicates of personal taste discussed by Lasersohn (2005, 2008, 2009), mood choice, and similar phenomena. In comparatives, subjective mode is manifested as an attitude of preference, with possible addition of expressive meaning.


Metalinguistic comparative MORE Metalinguistic THAN Preference attitude Subjective mode Anchor of comparison Quotation Expressive meaning Vulgar minimizers Rescuing of NPIs Greek Korean 


  1. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 1–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–343. Google Scholar
  3. Canstant, Noah, Christopher Davis, Christopher Potts, and Florian Schwarz. 2009. The pragmatics of expressive content: Evidence from large corpora. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung 33: 5–21. Google Scholar
  4. Choe, Jae-Woong. 2004. Obligatory honorification and the honorific feature. Studies in Generative Grammar 14: 545–559. Google Scholar
  5. Choi, Incheol. 2003. A constraint-based approach to Korean partial honorific agreement. In The role of agreement in natural language: TLS 5 Proceedings, ed. William Earl Griffin, 157–166. Austin: Department of Linguistics. Google Scholar
  6. Dictionary of the National Institute of Korean Language. 2008. National Institute of Korean Language. Google Scholar
  7. Drozd, Kenneth F. 1995. Child English pre-sentential negation as metalinguistic exclamatory sentence negation. Journal of Child Language 22: 583–610. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Embick, David. 2007. Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 1–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farkas, Donka F. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Romance languages and linguistic theory, eds. Paul Hirschbühler and Konrad Koerner, 69–104. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar
  10. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar
  11. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1999. Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative…concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 659–735. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2006. Only, emotive factives, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82: 575–603. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2011. Positive polarity items and negative polarity items: Variation, licensing, and compositionality. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, eds. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  16. Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Melita Stavrou. 2009. Metalinguistic comparatives and negation in Greek. In Proceedings of the 2007 workshop on Greek syntax and semantics (MIT working papers in linguistics 57), eds. Claire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman, and David Hill, 57–74. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  17. Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Suwon Yoon. 2009. Metalinguistic functions and the expressive dimension in Greek and Korean: Attitude semantics, expressive meaning and NPI licensing. In Proceedings of the 13 th Sinn und Bedeutung, eds. Ljudmila Geist, Klaus von Heusinger, Hans Kamp, Udo Klein, Fabienne Martin, Edgar Onea, Arndt Riester, and Torgrim Solstad, 141–156. Stuttgart: Online Publikationsverbund der Universität Stuttgart (OPUS). Google Scholar
  18. Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Suwon Yoon. 2010. No NPI licensing in clausal comparatives. In Proceedings of the 46th Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. Timothy Grinsell, Adam Baker, Julia Thomas, Rebekah Baglini, and Jon Keane. Chicago: University of Chicago. Google Scholar
  19. Han, Eunjoo. 1991. Honorification in Korean. Ms. Stanford University. Google Scholar
  20. Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than’s in English. In Papers from the 9th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, eds. Claudia Corum, Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann Weiser, 179–191. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. Google Scholar
  21. Heim, Irene. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heim, Irene. 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of SALT X, eds. Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, 40–64. Ithaca: CLC Publications. Google Scholar
  23. Hila-Markopoulou, Despoina. 2007. Apo tin exelixi ton grammatikon kategorion: i periptosi tu sigkritiku para [From the evolution of grammatical categories: the comparative para]. Talk at the Linguistics Department, University of Ioannina, Greece. Google Scholar
  24. Holton, David, Peter Mackridge, and Irene Philippaki-Warburton. 1997. Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  25. Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar
  26. Horn, Laurence R. 2000. Pick a theory (Not just any theory): Indiscriminatives and the free-choice indefinite. In Negation and polarity: Syntactic and semantic perspectives, eds. Laurence R. Horn and Yasuhiko Kato, 147–192. Oxford: University Press. Google Scholar
  27. Horn, Laurence R. 2002. Assertoric inertia and NPI-licensing. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 38), eds. Mary Andronis, Erin Debenport, Anne Pycha, and Keiko Yoshimura, 55–82. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. Google Scholar
  28. Joe, Jieun, and Chungmin Lee. 2002. A ‘removal’ type of negative predicates. In Proceedings of the 10th Japanese Korean linguistics conference. CSLI Publication. Google Scholar
  29. Kennedy, Chris. 1997. Projecting the adjective. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz. Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy, Chris. 2007. Modes of comparison. In Papers from the 43rd annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. Malcolm Elliott, James Kirby, Osamu Sawada, and Eleni Staraki, Suwon Yoon. Chicago: Chicago Linguitics Society. Google Scholar
  31. Kim, Jong-Bok, and Jaehyung Yang. 2005. Parsing Korean honorification in a typed feature structure grammar. Paper presented at CLS 41, April 2005. Google Scholar
  32. Kim, Jong-Bok, and Peter Sells. 2007. Korean honorification: A kind of expressive meaning. Journal of East Asian Linguistics Journal 16: 303–336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larson, Richard. 1988. Scope of comparatives. Linguistics & Philosophy 11: 1–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75: 522–571. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lasersohn, Peter. 2008. Quantification and perspective in relativist semantics. Paper presented at the University of Chicago Compositionality Workshop, May 2008. Google Scholar
  37. Lasersohn, Peter. 2009. Relative truth, speaker commitment, and control of implicit arguments. Synthese 166: 359–374. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lechner, Winfried. 2007. Comments on ‘metalinguistic contrast in the grammar of Greek. Handout, Workshop on Greek Syntax and Semantics, MIT. Google Scholar
  39. Lechner, Winfried. 2009. Metametacomparatives: Comments on “Metalinguistic contrast in the grammar of Greek. In Proceedings of the 2007 workshop on Greek syntax and semantics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57), eds. Claire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman, and David Hill, 75–90. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  40. Lee, Iksop, and Robert Ramsey. 2000. The Korean language. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
  41. McCawley, Jim. 1968. The role of semantics in a grammar. In Universals in linguistic theory, eds. Emmon Bach, and Robert Harms, 124–69. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Google Scholar
  42. McCawley, Jim. 1988. The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  43. Merchant, Jason. 2009. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax. Journal of Greek Linguistics 9: 134–164. Google Scholar
  44. Morzycki, Marcin. 2009. Metalinguistic Comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. In Proceedings of NELS 38, eds. Muhammad Abdurrahman, Anisa Schardl, and Martin Walkow. Amherst: GLSA Publications. Google Scholar
  45. Parl, Byung-Soo. 1992. The semantic and pragmatic nature of honorific agreement in Korean: An information-based approach. Ms., Kyung-Hee University, South Korea, and Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Google Scholar
  46. Park, Eun-Hae. 2009. Free choice and wh-indeterminate quantification in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago. Google Scholar
  47. Pollard, Carl, and Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: CSLI Publications. Google Scholar
  48. Postal, Paul. 2002. The structure of one type of American English vulgar minimizer. In Skeptical linguistic essays. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  49. Potts, Christopher, and Shigeto Kawahara. 2004. Japanese honorifics as emotive definite descriptions. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14, eds. Kazuha Watanabe, and Robert B. Young, 235–254. Ithaca: CLC Publications. Google Scholar
  50. Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  51. Potts, Christopher. 2007a. The dimensions of quotation. In Direct compositionality, eds. Chris Barker, and Pauline Jacobson, 405–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  52. Potts, Christopher. 2007b. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 7: 1–32. Google Scholar
  53. Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in wh-quantification. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA. Google Scholar
  54. Stalnaker, Robert. 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  55. Stavrou, Melita. 1982. Some remarks on comparative complements in Modern Greek [in Greek]. In Studies in Greek linguistics, 73–105. Thessaloniki: Kyrjakides. Google Scholar
  56. Stephenson, Tamina. 2007. Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 487–525. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Villalta, Elisabeth. 2008. Mood and gradability: An investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Linguistics and Philosophy 31: 467–522. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang, In-Seok. 1973. Semantics of delimiters. Language Research 9: 84–121. Google Scholar
  60. Yoon, James. 2005. Non-morphological determination of nominal affix ordering in Korean. In Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives, eds. Lorie Heggie, and Francisco Ordóñez, 239–282. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar
  61. Zwarts, Frans. 1995. Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25: 286–312. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations