Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 475–537 | Cite as

Base-driven leveling in Yiddish verb paradigms

  • Adam AlbrightEmail author


Short Vowel Past Participle Sound Change Vowel Length Middle High German 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackerman, Farrell, and James P. Blevins. 2006. Paradigms and predictability. Paper presented at the 2006 meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Albuquerque, NM, Jan. 5–8. Google Scholar
  2. Albright, Adam. 2002a. The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  3. Albright, Adam. 2002b. Islands of reliability for regular morphology: evidence from Italian. Language. 78: 684–709. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albright, Adam. 2005. The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. In Paradigms in phonological theory, eds. Laura J. Downing, Tracy Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen, 17–43. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  5. Albright, Adam. 2008a. Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. In Language universals and language change, ed. Jeff Good, 144–181. London: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Albright, Adam. 2008b. Inflectional paradigms have bases too: evidence from Yiddish. In The bases of inflectional identity, eds. Asaf Bachrach and Andrew Nevins, 271–312. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  7. Albright, Adam, and Bruce Hayes. 2002. Modeling English past tense intuitions with minimal generalization. In SIGPHON 6: proceedings of the sixth meeting of the ACL special interest group in computational phonology, 58–69. Google Scholar
  8. Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock, and Hedderik van Rijn. 1993. The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. Google Scholar
  9. Baković, Eric. 1999. Assimilation to the unmarked. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6.1, eds. Jim Alexander, Na-Rae Han, and Michelle Minnick Fox, 1–16 Google Scholar
  10. Baroni, Marco. 1998. The phonetic nature of the Northern Italian allophones [s] and [z] in words with variable realization: electroglottographic and acoustic evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 96: 166–174. Google Scholar
  11. Behaghel, Otto. 1928. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache, 5th edn. No. 3 in Grundriss der germanischen Philologie, Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  12. Benua, Laura. 1997. Transderivational identity: phonological relations between words. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Google Scholar
  13. Benveniste, Émile. 1966. La nature des pronoms. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, 251–266. Saint-Amand: Gallimard. Google Scholar
  14. Besch, Werner. 1967. Sprachlandschaften und Sprachausgleich im 15. Jahrhundert: Studien zur Erforschung der spätmittelhochdeutschen Schreibdialekte und zur Entstehung der neuhochdeutschen Schriftsprache. Vol. 11 of Bibliotheca Germanica. Handbücher, Texte und Monographien aus dem Gebiete der germanischen Philologie. München: Francke. Google Scholar
  15. Bin-Nun, Jechiel. 1973. Jiddisch und die deutschen Mundarten: unter besondere Berücksichtigung des ostgalizischen Jiddisch. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar
  16. Blevins, James P. 2000. Markedness and agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society 98: 233–262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42: 531–573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brenner, Otto. 1895. Zum deutschen Vokalismus. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 20: 80–87. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burzio, Luigi. 1994. Metrical consistency. In Proceedings of the DIMACS workshop on human language, ed. Eric Ristad. Providence: American Mathematical Society. Google Scholar
  20. Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar
  21. Chen, Matthew. 1970. Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22: 129–159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clahsen, Harald, Fraibet, Aveledo, and Iggy Roca. 2002a. The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language 29: 591–622. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clahsen, Harald, Peter Prüfert, Sonja Eisenbeiss, and Joana Cholin. 2002b. Strong stems in the German mental lexicon: evidence from child language acquisition and adult processing. In More than words. Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, eds. Ingrid Kaufmann and Barbara Stiebels, 91–112. Berlin: Akadamie Verlag. Google Scholar
  24. Dammers, Ulf, Walter Hoffmann, and Hans-Joachim Solms. 1988. Grammatik des Frühneuhochdeutschen. Vol. 4 of Flexion der starken und schwachen Verben. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag. Google Scholar
  25. Dinnsen, Daniel A., and Charles-Luce Jan. 1984. Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics 12(1): 49–60. Google Scholar
  26. Dresher, B. Elan. 2000. Analogical levelling of vowel length in West Germanic. In Analogy, levelling, markedness: principles of change in phonology and morphology, ed. Aditi Lahiri. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  27. Ebert, Robert Peter, Oskar Reichmann, Hans-Joachim Solms, and Klaus-Peter Wegera. 1993. Frühneuhochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar
  28. Ernestus, Mirjam, and R. Harald Baayen. 2003. Predicting the unpredictable: interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79: 5–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Faber, Alice, and Robert D. King. 1984. Yiddish and the settlement history of Ashkenazic Jewry. Mankind Quarterly 24: 393–425. Google Scholar
  30. Fertig, David. 2000. Morphological change up close: two and a half centuries of verbal inflection in Nuremberg. Vol. 422 of Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar
  31. Follmann, Michael Ferdinand, ed. 1909. Wörterbuch der deutsch-lothringischen Mundarten. Vol. 12 of Quellen zur lothringischen Geschichte. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer. Google Scholar
  32. Frakes, Jerold C. 2004. Early Yiddish texts: 1100–1750. Oxford: University Press. Google Scholar
  33. Gaeta, Livio. 2002. Umlaut extension in German modals as natural change. Diachronica 19: 1–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garrett, Andrew. 2008. Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Language universals and language change, ed. Jeff Good, 125–143. Oxford: University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Geyer, Alfred. 1912. Die starke Konjugation bei Johann Fischart. Halle: Hofbuchdruckerei C. A. Kaemmerer & Co. Google Scholar
  36. Gutman, Teodor. 1928. Di konsonantn asimilatsye in zats [Consonantal assimilation in sentences]. Filologishe shriftn 107–110. Google Scholar
  37. Haines, James L. 1975. Proto-Yiddish and the history of Yiddish phonology: the front rounded vowel phonemes. No. 9 in Working papers in Yiddish and East European Jewish Studies. YIVO Institute for Jewish Research. Google Scholar
  38. Hall, T. A., and John H. G. Scott. 2007. Inflectional paradigms have a base: evidence from Southern German dialects. Morphology 17: 151–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harley, Heidi, and Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harris, James. 1974. Morphologization of phonological rules: an example from Chicano Spanish. In Linguistic studies in Romance languages, eds. R. Joe Campbell, Mark G. Goldin, and Mary Clayton Wang, 8–27. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar
  41. Harris, Zellig S. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  42. Hayes, Bruce. 1999. Phonological restructuring in Yidiɲ and its theoretical consequences. In The derivational residue in phonological optimality theory, eds. Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp, 175–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar
  43. Herzog, Marvin I. 1965. The Yiddish language in Northern Poland: its geography and history. Bloomington: Indiana University. Google Scholar
  44. Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoenigswald, Henry. 1960. Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  46. Hooper, Joan. 1980. Child morphology and morphophonemic change. In Historical morphology, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 157–187. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar
  47. Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1995. The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on reranking. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics [UMOP] 18: papers in Optimality Theory, eds. Jill Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk, and Laura Walsh Dickey, 181–209. Amherst: GLSA. Google Scholar
  48. Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2002. The phonological lexicon. In A handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Natsuko Tsujimura, 62–100. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  49. Jacobs, Neil G. 1989. Hebrew-Aramaic origin verbs in Yiddish: the interplay of inherited form and synchronic phonology. Mediterranean Language Review 4–5: 97–108. Google Scholar
  50. Jacobs, Neil G. 1990. Economy in Yiddish vocalism: a study in the interplay of Hebrew and non-Hebrew components, Mediterranean language and culture monograph series. Otto: Harrassowitz. Google Scholar
  51. Jacobs, Neil G. 1993. On pre-Yiddish standardization of quantity. Diachronica 10: 191–214. Google Scholar
  52. Jacobs, Neil G. 2005. Yiddish: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar
  53. Jakobson, Roman. 1932. Zur Structur des russischen Verbums. Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio Quinquagenario 74–83. Google Scholar
  54. Jasanoff, Jay H. 1973. The Germanic third weak class. Language 49: 850–870. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Joesten, Maria. 1931. Untersuchungen zu ahd. (as.) ë, i, vor u der Folgesilbe und zur 1. Pers. Sg. Präs. Ind. der starken e-Verben (Kl. IIIb, IV, V). In Gießener Beiträge zur deutschen Philologie, No. 28. Gießen: Wilhem Schmitz Verlag. 1968 reprint, Swets & Zeitlinger N.V., Amsterdam. Google Scholar
  56. Joos, Martin. 1952. The medieval sibilants. Language 28: 222–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  58. Kager, René. 2008. Lexical irregularity and the typology of contrast. In The nature of the word: essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, eds. Kristin Hanson and Sharon Inkelas, 397–432. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  59. Katz, Dovid. 1987. Grammar of the Yiddish language. London: Duckworth. Google Scholar
  60. Kenstowicz, Michael. 1997. Base identity and uniform exponence: alternatives to cyclicity. In Current trends in phonology: models and methods, eds. Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks, 363–394. Salford: University of Salford. Google Scholar
  61. Kenstowicz, Michael, and Charles Kisseberth. 1977. Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  62. Kern, Paul Oskar. 1903. Das starke Verb bei Grimmelshausen: Ein Beitrag zur Grammatik des Frühneuhochdeutschen. Chicago: University of Chicago. Google Scholar
  63. King, Robert D.. 1969. Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
  64. King, Robert D. 1980. The history of final devoicing in Yiddish. In The field of Yiddish: studies in language, folklore, and literature, fourth collection, eds. Marvin I. Herzog, Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Dan Miron, and Ruth Wisse, 371–430. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues. Google Scholar
  65. Kiparsky, Paul. 1965. Phonological change. PhD thesis, MIT. Google Scholar
  66. Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Universals in linguistic theory, eds. Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, 171–2002. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Reprinted in Kiparsky (1982). Google Scholar
  67. Kiparsky, Paul. 1974. Remarks on analogical change. In Historical linguistics II: theory and description in phonology. Proceedings of the first international conference on historial linguistics, Edinburg 2nd–7th, September 1973, eds. John M. Anderson and Ch. Jones, Vol. 12 of North-Holland Linguistic Series, 426–445. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Reprinted in Kiparsky (1982), 199–216. Google Scholar
  68. Kiparsky, Paul. 1978. Analogical change as a problem for linguistic theory. In Linguistics in the seventies: directions and prospects. No. 8:2 in Studies in the linguistic sciences, 217–236. Urbana: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Illinois, Urbana. Reprinted in Kiparsky (1982), 217–236. Google Scholar
  69. Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar
  70. Kisseberth, Charles. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 291–306. Google Scholar
  71. Ko, Heejeong. 2006. Base-output correspondence in Korean nominal inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(3): 195–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kopkallı, Handan. 1993. A phonetic and phonological analysis of final devoicing in Turkish. PhD thesis, University of Michigan. Google Scholar
  73. Kranzmayer, Eberhard. 1956. Historische Lautgeographie des gesamtbairischen Dialektraumes. Vienna: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger. Google Scholar
  74. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. The nature of the so-called analogical processes. (Trans.: Margaret Winters, 1995), Diachronica, 12: 113–145 Google Scholar
  75. Lahiri, Aditi, and Bezalel Elan Dresher. 1984. Diachronic and synchronic implications of declension shifts. The Linguistic Review 3: 141–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Landau, Alfred. 1895. Das Deminutivum der galizisch-jüdischen Mundart. Deutsche Mundarten 1: 46–58. Google Scholar
  77. Lass, Roger. 1980. Paradigm coherence and the conditioning of sound change. In Historical morphology, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 251–272. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar
  78. Levita [Bokher], Elia. 1541. Bovo D’Antona. Isny. Facsimile edition (1945) in Elye Bokher: Poetishe shafungen in Yidish, Ershter band: reproduktsye fun der ershter oysgobe ‘Bovo D’Antone’, Isny, 1541, mit a kurtsn araynfir fun Yuda A. Yofe, [Elye Bokher: Poetic words in Yiddish, Vol. 1: reproduction of the first edition ‘Bovo D’Antone’, Isny, 1541, with a short introduction by Judah A. Joffe] ed. Judah A. Joffe. New York: Judah A. Joffe Publication Committee. Google Scholar
  79. Manaster Ramer, Alexis, and Meyer Wolf. 1997. Yiddish origins and the Austro-Bavarian problem. Folia Linguistica Historica 17: 193–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mańczak, Witold. 1958. Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 7: 298–325, 387–420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mańczak, Witold. 1980. Laws of analogy. In Historical morphology, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 283–288. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar
  82. Marcus, Gary, Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, and Fei Xu. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Google Scholar
  83. Marti, Werner. 1985. Berndeutsch-Grammatik für die heutige Mundart zwischen Thun und Jura. Bern: Francke Verlag. Google Scholar
  84. Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion. English translation by Janice Siedler (1981), Morphological Naturalness. Ann Arbor: Karoma. Google Scholar
  85. McCarthy, John J. 1998. Morpheme structure constraints and paradigm occultation. In CLS 32, Vol. II: the panels, eds. M. Catherine Gruber, Derrick Higgins, Kenneth Olson, and Tamra Wysocki. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Google Scholar
  86. McCarthy, John J. 2005. Optimal paradigms. In Paradigms in phonological theory, eds. Laura J. Downing, Tracy Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen, 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available from the Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-485. Google Scholar
  87. McGinnis, Martha. 2005. On markedness asymmetries in person and number. Language 81: 699–718. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mieses, Matthias. 1924. Die jiddische Sprache: Eine historische Grammatik des Idioms der integralen Juden Ost- und Mitteleuropas. Berlin/Vienna: Benjamin Harz. Google Scholar
  89. Morris, Richard E. 2005. Attraction to the unmarked in Old Spanish leveling. In Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic linguistics symposium, ed. David Eddington, 180–191. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Google Scholar
  90. Nordström, Torsten. 1911. Studien über die Ausbilding der neuhochdeutschen starken Präsensinflexion. Uppsala dissertation. Google Scholar
  91. Nübling, Damaris. 2000. Prinzipien der Irregularisierung: Eine kontrastive Analyse von zehn Verben in zehn germanischen Sprachen. No. 415 in Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar
  92. Osthoff, Hermann, and Karl Brugmann. 1878. Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen: Erster Theil. Leipzig: S. Hirzel. Google Scholar
  93. Paul, Hermann. 1920. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer. Google Scholar
  94. Paul, Hermann, Peter Wiehl, and Siegfried Grosse. 1989. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 23rd edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar
  95. Paunonen, Heikki. 1976. Allomorfien dynamiikkaa. Virittäjä 79: 82–107. Google Scholar
  96. Penny, Ralph. 2002. A history of the Spanish language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  97. Penzl, Herbert. 1949. Umlaut and secondary umlaut in Old High German. Language 25: 223–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Penzl, Herbert. 1968. Die mittelhochdeutschen Sibilanten und ihre Weiterentwicklung. Word 24: 340–349. Google Scholar
  99. Philipp, Gerhard. 1980. Einführung ins Frühneuhochdeutsche: Sprachgeschichte, Grammatik, Texte. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer. Google Scholar
  100. Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules: the ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
  101. Port, Robert, and Michael O’Dell. 1986. Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German. Journal of Phonetics 13: 455–471. Google Scholar
  102. Prilutski, Noah. 1917. Der yidisher konsonantizm [The Yiddish consonantism], No. 1 in Yidishe dialektologishe forshungen [Yiddish dialectological research]. Warsaw: Nayer Farlag. Google Scholar
  103. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  104. Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America. Google Scholar
  105. Rockowitz, Anna C. 1979. 201 Yiddish verbs, fully conjugated in all the tenses. Woodbury: Barron’s Education Series, Inc. Google Scholar
  106. Russ, Charles V. J. 1982. Studies in historical German phonology: a phonological comparison of MHG and NHG with reference to modern dialects. Vol. 616 of European university studies, series I: German language and literature. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar
  107. Sadock, Jerrold M. 1973. Word-final devoicing in the development of Yiddish. In Issues in linguistics: papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, eds. Braj B. Kachru, Robert B. Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli, and Sol Saporta, 790–797. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar
  108. Sapir, Edward. 1915. Notes on Judeo-German phonology. The Jewish Quarterly Review 6: 231–266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Schindler, Jochem. 1974. Fragen zum paradigmatischen Ausgleich. Die Sprache 20: 1–9. Google Scholar
  110. Schirmunski, Viktor M. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Google Scholar
  111. Sonderegger, Stefan. 2003. Althochdeutsche Sprache und Literatur: Eine Einführung in das älteste Deutsch: Darstellung und Grammatik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  112. Steriade, Donca. 2000. Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics/phonology boundary. In Papers in laboratory phonology V: acquisition and the lexicon, eds. Michael Broe and Janet Pierrehumbert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  113. Sturgeon, Anne. 2003. Paradigm uniformity: evidence for inflectional bases. In WCCFL 22 Proceedings eds. Gina Garding and Mimu Tsujimura, 464–476. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
  114. Sturtevant, Edgar H. 1917. Linguistic change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Republished 1961. Google Scholar
  115. Tiersma, Peter. 1982. Local and general markedness. Language 58: 832–849. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Phonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. In Schuchhardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change: four essays by Hugo Schuchhardt, eds. Theo Vennemann and Terence H. Wilbur, No. 26 in Linguistische Forschungen, 183–204. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum. Google Scholar
  117. Vincent, Nigel. 1974. Analogy reconsidered. In Historical linguistics II: theory and description in phonology. Proceedings of the first international conference on historical linguistics. Edinburgh 2nd–7th, September 1973, eds. John M. Anderson and Charles Jones, Vol. 12b of North-Holland Linguistic Series, 426–445. Amsterdam: North Holland. Google Scholar
  118. Wegera, Klaus-Peter. 1985. Morphologie des frühneuhochdeutschen. In Sprachgeschichte: Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, Vol. 2, eds. Werner Besch, Oskar Reichmann, and Stefan Sonderegger, 1313–1322. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Chap. 121. Google Scholar
  119. Weinhold, Karl. 1883. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 2nd edn. Paderborn: Schöningh. Reprinted 1967. Google Scholar
  120. Weinreich, Max. 1928. Vegn di daytshishe elementn in Yidish: leksikologisher etyud [Regarding the German elements in Yiddish: lexicological etude]. Tsaytshrift far di yidisher geshikhte, demografie un ekonomik, literatur-forshung, shprakhvisnshaft un etnografie. [Journal for Jewish History, Demography and Economics, Literature Research, Linguistics and Ethnography], 2–3: 677–688. Google Scholar
  121. Weinreich, Max. 1973. Geshikhte fun der yidisher shprakh: Bagrifn, faktn, metodn [History of the Yiddish language: concepts, facts, methods], Vol. 2. New York: Yidisher Visnshaftlikher Institut (YIVO). Google Scholar
  122. Weinreich, Uriel. 1958. Yiddish and colonial German in Eastern Europe: the differential impact of Slavic. In American contributions to the fourth international congress of Slavicists, Moscow, September 1958, 369–421. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton. Google Scholar
  123. Weinreich, Uriel. 1990. Modern English-Yiddish, Yiddish-English dictionary. New York: YIVO Institute for Jewish Research. Google Scholar
  124. Wetzels, Leo. 1984. Paradigm leveling in Latin and Old French: a critical view of rule inversion. In Papers from the XIIth linguistic symposium on romance languages, ed. Philip Baldi, No. 26 in Current issues in linguistic theory, 579–599. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar
  125. Zaretski, Ayzik. 1926. Praktishe yidishe gramatik far lerers un studentn. [Practical Yiddish grammar for teachers and students]. Moscow: Farlag Aktsionern Gezelshaft “Shul un Bukh”. Google Scholar
  126. Zehetner, Ludwig. 1985. Das bairische Dialektbuch. München: Verlag C.H. Beck. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations