Gradient phonotactics and the Complexity Hypothesis
- First Online:
Lexical items can be more or less well-formed depending on the phoneme combinations they contain. This phenomenon is called gradient phonotactics. We propose an approach to gradient phonotactics based on Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993/2004). At the heart of the proposal is the Complexity Hypothesis that attributes the relative well-formedness of a lexical item to its relative grammatical complexity measured in terms of ranking information: the more complex the lexical item, the less well-formed it is. The theory orders linguistic structures in an implicational hierarchy that reflects their relative well-formedness. Some implications are universal; others depend on language-specific rankings. The Complexity Hypothesis is supported by phonotactic data from Muna (Austronesian) as recently analyzed by Coetzee and Pater (2008).
KeywordsGradient phonotactics Implicational universals Factorial typologies Optimality Theory
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Albright, Adam. 2006. Gradient phonotactic effects: Lexical? Grammatical? Both? Neither? Paper presented at the 80th annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, January 5–8, in Albuquerque, NM. Google Scholar
- Anttila, Arto. 2007. Word stress in Finnish. Paper presented at the 81st annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, January 4–7, in Anaheim, CA. Google Scholar
- Anttila, Arto. 2008. Phonological constraints on constituent ordering. In Proceedings of the 26th west coast conference on formal linguistics, eds. Charles B. Chang and Hannah Haynie, 51–59. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
- Anttila, Arto, and Curtis Andrus. 2006. T-order generator [Computer program]. Stanford University. http://www.stanford.edu/~anttila/research/software.html. Accessed 4 May 2008.
- Anttila, Arto, Vivienne Fong, Stefan Benus, and Jennifer Nycz. 2008. Variation and opacity in Singapore English consonant clusters. Phonology 25(2). Google Scholar
- Becker, Michael, Joseph Pater, and Christopher Potts. 2007. OT-Help (Version 1.1) [Computer program]. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://web.linguist.umass.edu/~OTHelp/. Accessed 4 May 2008.
- Berkley, Deborah Milam. 1994a. Variability and Obligatory Contour Principle effects. In Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 2: the parasession on variation and linguistic theory, eds. Katharine Beals, Jeannette M. Denton, Robert Knippen, Lynette Melnar, Hisami Suzuki, and Erica Zeinfeld, 1–12. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. Google Scholar
- Berkley, Deborah Milam. 1994b. The OCP and gradient data. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 24: 59–72. Google Scholar
- Berkley, Deborah Milam. 2000. Gradient Obligatory Contour Principle effects. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University. Google Scholar
- Boersma, Paul. 2004. A stochastic OT account of paralinguistic tasks such as grammaticality and prototypicality judgments. [ROA-648]. Google Scholar
- Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2007. Praat: a system for doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam. http://www.praat.org/. Accessed 4 May 2008.
- Brasoveanu, Adrian, and Alan Prince. 2005. Ranking and necessity, Part I: the fusional reduction algorithm. [ROA-794]. Google Scholar
- Coetzee, Andries W., and Joe Pater. 2006. Lexically ranked OCP-Place constraints in Muna. Ms, University of Michigan and University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [ROA-842]. Google Scholar
- Coetzee, Andries W., and Joe Pater. 2008. Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (to appear). [ROA-950]. Google Scholar
- Coleman, John, and Janet Pierrehumbert. 1997. Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability. In Computational phonology: third meeting of the ACL special interest group in computational phonology, eds. John Coleman, 49–56. Somerset: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar
- Cowan, J. Milton. 1979. Hans Wehr: a dictionary of modern written Arabic. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz. Google Scholar
- De Lacy, Paul. 2002. The formal expression of markedness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [ROA-542]. Google Scholar
- Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
- Greenberg, Joseph. 1950. The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 6: 162–181. Google Scholar
- Greenberg, Joseph H., and James J. Jenkins. 1964. Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word 20: 157–177. Google Scholar
- Hammond, Michael. 2004. Gradience, phonotactics, and the lexicon in English phonology. International Journal of English Studies 4(2): 1–24. Google Scholar
- Hay, Jennifer, Janet Pierrehumbert, and Mary Beckman. 2004. Speech perception, well-formedness, and the statistics of the lexicon. In Papers in laboratory phonology VI, eds. John Local, Richard Ogden, and Rosalind Temple, 58–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Hayes, Bruce, Bruce Tesar, and Kie Zuraw. 2003. OTSoft (Version 2.1) [Computer program]. http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/otsoft/. Accessed 4 May 2008.
- Karlsson, Fred. 1982. Suomen kielen äänne- ja muotorakenne [The phonological and morphological structure of Finnish]. Helsinki: Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö. Google Scholar
- Keller, Frank. 2006. Linear Optimality Theory as a model of gradience in grammar. In Gradience in grammar: generative perspectives, eds. Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Ralph Vogel, and Matthias Schlesewsky, 270–287. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Kiparsky, Paul. 1994. Remarks on markedness. Handout from TREND 2 (Trilateral Phonology Weekend), January 22, University of California, Santa Cruz. http://www.stanford.edu/~kiparsky/Papers/trend.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2008.
- Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. The phonological basis of sound change. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. John A. Goldsmith, 640–670. Cambridge: Blackwell. Google Scholar
- Kiparsky, Paul. 2008. Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: the bumpy ride from phrase to word. Ms, Stanford University. Google Scholar
- Leben, William R. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Google Scholar
- Legendre, Géraldine, Yoshiro Miyata, and Paul Smolensky. 1990. Harmonic Grammar—a formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: theoretical foundations. In Proceedings of the 12th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 388–395. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
- Legendre, Géraldine, Sorace Antonella, and Paul Smolensky. 2006. The Optimality Theory—harmonic grammar connection. In The harmonic mind: from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar, vol. 2, eds. Paul Smolensky and Géraldine Legendre, 339–402. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Manning, Christopher D., and Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- McCarthy, John. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In Phonological structure and phonetic form: papers in laboratory phonology 3, eds. Patricia Keating, 191–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- McCarthy, John. 2002. A thematic guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Ohala, John, and Manjari Ohala. 1986. Testing hypotheses regarding the psychological manifestation of morpheme structure constraints. In Experimental psychology, eds. John Ohala and Jeri J. Jaeger, 239–252. San Diego: Academic Press. Google Scholar
- Padgett, Jaye. 1995. Stricture in feature geometry. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Google Scholar
- Pater, Joe, and Andries Coetzee. 2005. Lexically specific constraints: Gradience, learnability, and perception. In Proceedings of the 3rd Seoul international conference on phonology, 85–119. Seoul: Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea. Google Scholar
- Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1993. Dissimilarity in the Arabic verbal roots. In NELS 23: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. Amy Schafer, 367–381. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Google Scholar
- Prince, Alan. 2002a. Entailed ranking arguments. [ROA-500]. Google Scholar
- Prince, Alan. 2002b. Arguing optimality. [ROA-562]. Google Scholar
- Prince, Alan. 2006. Implication and impossibility in grammatical systems: what it is and how to find it. [ROA-880]. Google Scholar
- Prince, Alan. 2007. The pursuit of theory. In The Cambridge handbook of phonology, ed. Paul de Lacy, 33–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar
- Samek-Lodovici, Vieri, and Alan Prince. 2005. Fundamental properties of Harmonic Bounding. [ROA-785]. Google Scholar
- Smith, Jennifer L. 1998. Noun faithfulness: on the privileged status of nouns in phonology. [ROA-242]. Google Scholar
- Smolensky, Paul, and Géraldine Legendre. 2006. The harmonic mind: from neural computation to Optimality-Theoretic grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- van den Berg, René. 1989. A grammar of the Muna language. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar
- van den Berg, René, and La Ode Sidu. 1996. Muna-English dictionary. Leiden: KITLV Press. Google Scholar
- van der Wyk, Brent C., and James L. McClelland. 2007. Graded constraints on English word forms. Poster presented at the workshop on variation, gradience and frequency in phonology, July 7, Stanford University. Google Scholar
- Vitevitch, Michael S., Paul A. Luce, Jan Charles-Luce, and David Kemmerer. 1997. Phonotactics and syllable stress: implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech 40: 47–62. Google Scholar