Advertisement

Channeling language

  • Richard P. MeierEmail author
Book Review

Abstract

Review of Wendy Sandler & Diane Lillo-Martin. (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, xxi + 547 pp. Trevor Johnston & Adam Schembri. (2007). Australian Sign Language: An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, xiv + 323 pp.

References

  1. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aronoff, M., Meir, I., & Sandler, W. (2005). The paradox of sign language morphology. Language, 81, 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayley, R., Lucas, C., & Rose, M. (2000). Variation in American Sign Language: The case of DEAF. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4, 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellugi, U., & Fischer, S. (1972). A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition, 1, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bobaljik, J. (1995). Morphosyntax: the syntax of verbal inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  6. Brentari, D. (2002). Modality differences in sign language phonology and morphophonemics. In R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 65–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Colarusso, J. (1992). A grammar of the Kabardian language. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  8. Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1990). Beyond the input given: The child’s role in the acquisition of language. Language, 66, 323–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins, J. A., & Cutler, A. (1988). Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry. In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 280–317). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Hohenberger, A., Happ, D., & Leuninger, H. (2002). Modality-dependent aspects of sign language production: evidence from slips of the hands and their repairs in German Sign Language. In R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 112–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kegl, J., Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (1999). Creation through contact: sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Lasnik, H. (1995). Verbal morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Program. In H. Campos, & P. Kempchinsky (Eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Studies in honor of Carlos P. Otero (pp. 251–275). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Liddell, S. K. (1984). THINK and BELIEVE: sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language, 60, 372–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liddell, S. K. (1995). Real, surrogate, and token space: grammatical consequences in ASL. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space (pp. 19–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Liddell, S. K., & Johnson, R. E. (1989). American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 64, 197–277.Google Scholar
  22. MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (1993). Motor explanations of babbling and early speech patterns. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. F. MacNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 341–352). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Mauk, C. E., Lindblom, B., & Meier, R. P. (In press). Undershoot of ASL locations in fast signing. In J. Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004. Seedorf, Germany: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Meier, R. P. (1990). Person deixis in American Sign Language. In S. D. Fischer, & P. Siple (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, vol. 1: Linguistics (pp. 175–190). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Meier, R. P. (1993). A psycholinguistic perspective on phonological segmentation in sign and speech. In G. R. Coulter (Ed.), Phonetics and phonology, vol. 3: Current issues in American Sign Language phonology (pp. 169–188). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Meier, R. P., & Lillo-Martin, D. (In press). Does spatial make it special? On the grammar of pointing signs in American Sign Language. In D. B. Gerdts, J. Moore, & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Meier, R. P., Mauk, C., Cheek, A., & Moreland, C. J. (2008). The form of children’s early signs: Iconic or motoric determinants? Language Learning & Development, 4, 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mesch, J. (2001). Tactile sign language: Turn-taking and questions in signed conversations of deaf-blind people. Seedorf, Germany: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Mithun, M. (1984). The evolution of noun incorporation. Language, 60, 847–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neidle, C., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Bahan, B., & Lee, R. G. (2000). The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Neidle, C., MacLauglin, D., Lee, R. G., Bahan, B., & Kegl, J. (1998). The rightward analysis of wh-movement in ASL: a reply to Petronio and Lillo-Martin. Language, 74, 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petronio, K., & Lillo-Martin, D. (1997). Wh-movement and the position of Spec-CP: evidence from American Sign Language. Language, 73, 18–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfau, R., & Zeshan, U. (2003). Wh-movement and wh-split in Indo-Pakastani Sign Language. Paper presented at South Asian Languages Analysis XXIII, University of Texas at Austin, Oct. 11, 2003.Google Scholar
  34. Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.Google Scholar
  35. Polich, L. (2005). The emergence of the deaf community in Nicaragua. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Quadros, R. M. de. (1999). Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
  37. Quinto-Pozos, D. (2002). Deictic points in the visual-gestural and tactile-gestural modalities. In R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 442–467). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 2661–2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schauber, E. (1979). The syntax and semantics of questions in Navajo. New York: Garland [Published version of 1975 MIT dissertation].Google Scholar
  40. Supalla, S. J. (1991). Manually coded english: the modality question in signed language development. In P. Siple, & S. Fischer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, vol. 2: Psychology (pp. 85–109). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thelen, E. (1979). Rhythmical stereotypies in normal hearing infants. Animal Behaviour, 27, 699–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations