Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 825–857 | Cite as

The grammar of autonomy in Irish

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examines so-called autonomous forms of the verb in Irish in the context of ongoing work on the syntax and semantics of arbitrary pronominal subjects (on on French; man in German and so on). It argues for the syntactic presence of a phonologically null subject in such constructions and attempts to understand various characteristics of such impersonal constructions (with respect to binding and control especially) in the light of that hypothesis.

Keywords

Impersonals Arbitrary pronouns Agreement Inflection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackema, P., & Neeleman, A. (2003). Context-sensitive spell-out. Natural Language and Linguistic Thoery, 21, 681–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, D. (1997). VSO order and weak pronouns in Goidelic Celtic. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 42, 9–29.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, S. (1982). Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 571–612.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, A. (1990). Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 507–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Authier, J. P. (1989). Arbitary null objects and unselective binding. In O. Jaeggli & K. J. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 45–67). Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Bondaruk, A. (2004). PRO and control in English, Irish and Polish—a minimalist analysis. Lublin, Poland: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
  7. Bondaruk, A., & Charzyńska-Wójcik, M. (2003). Expletive pro in impersonal passives in Irish, Polish, and Old English. Linguistische Berichte, 195, 325–362.Google Scholar
  8. Carnie, A., & Harley, H. (1998). Clausal architecture: The licensing of major constituents in a verb initial language. MS, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  9. Chierchia, G. (1995). The variability of impersonal subjects. In E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, & B. Partee (Eds.), Quantification in natural languages (Vol. 1, pp. 107–143). Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Christian Brothers, T. (1960). Graiméar Gaeilge na mBráithre Críostaí. Dublin, Ireland: Mac an Ghoill.Google Scholar
  12. Chung, S., & McCloskey, J. (1987). Government, barriers and small clauses in Modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 173–237.Google Scholar
  13. Cinque, G. (1988). On Si constructions and the theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 621–581.Google Scholar
  14. Condoravdi, C. (1989). Indefinite and generic pronouns. In E. J. Fee & K. Hunt (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth annual west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 71–85). Stanford, California: CSLI.Google Scholar
  15. D’Alessandro, R. (2004). Impersonal si constructions: Agreement and interpretation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  16. D’Alessandro, R., & Alexiadou, A. (2003). Inclusive and exclusive impersonal pronouns: A feature-geometrical analysis. Paper presented at the XXIV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Urbino, Italy, February 2003.Google Scholar
  17. Davidson, D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher (Ed.), The logic of decision and action (pp. 3–17). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  18. Duffield, N. (1995). Particles and projections in Irish syntax. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Egerland, V. (2003). Impersonal pronouns in Scandinavian and Romance. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 71, 75–102.Google Scholar
  20. Embick, D., & Noyer, R. (2001). Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(4), 555–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldberg, L. (2005). Verb-stranding VP ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  22. Greene, D. (1966). The Irish language/An Ghaeilge. Published for the Cultural Relations Committee of Ireland at the Three Candles, LTD., Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  23. Guilfoyle, E. (1990). Functional categories and phrase structure parameters. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  24. Harley, H. (2002). Irish, the EPP, and PRO. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  25. Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachussets, Amherst.Google Scholar
  26. Jaeggli, O. (1986). On arbitrary plural pronominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4, 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and discourse representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, & M. Stockhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 277–322). Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.Google Scholar
  28. Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Koenig, J.-P. (1999). On a tué le président! the nature of passives and ultradefinites. In B. Fox, D. Jurafsky, & L. Michaelis (Eds.), Cognition and function in language (pp. 256–272). Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Koenig, J.-P., & Mauner, G. (2000). A-definites and the discourse status of implicit arguments. Journal of Semantics, 16, 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kratzer, A. (1997). German impersonal pronouns and logophoricity. Presented to Sinn und Bedeutung, Berlin 1997. Handout available at http://semanticsarchive.net.
  32. Krifka, M., Pelletier, F., Carlson, G. N., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–124). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Legate, J. (1999). The morphosyntax of Irish agreement. In K. Arregi, B. Bruening, C. Krause, & V. Lin (Eds.), MITWPL 33: Papers on morphology and syntax, cycle one (pp. 219–240). Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar
  34. Mac Cana, P., & Ó Baoill, D. P. (1997). Gnéithe den chéasta sa Nua-Ghaeilge. In A. Ahlqvist & V. era Ĉapkova (Eds.), Dán do Oide, essays in memory of Conn R. Ó Cléirigh (pp. 265–280). Dublin, Ireland: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.Google Scholar
  35. Malamud, S. A. (2005). (In)definiteness-driven typology of arbitrary items. In S. Manninen, K. Hietaam, E. Keiser, & V. Vihman (Eds.), Passives and impersonals in European languages. John Benjamins (in press).Google Scholar
  36. McCloskey, J. (1979). Transformational syntax and model theoretic semantics: A case-study in modern Irish. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  37. McCloskey, J. (1980). Is there raising in modern Irish? Ériu, 31, 59–99.Google Scholar
  38. McCloskey, J. (1983). A VP in a VSO language. In E. K. Gerald Gazdar & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), Order, concord and constituency (pp. 9–55). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
  39. McCloskey, J. (1984). Raising, subcategorization, and selection in modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1, 441–485.Google Scholar
  40. McCloskey, J. (1986). Case, movement and raising in modern Irish. In S. M. J. Goldberg & M. Wescoat (Eds.), WCCFL IV: Proceedings of the fourth west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 190–205). Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
  41. McCloskey, J. (1990). Resumptive pronouns, Ā-binding and levels of representation in Irish. In R. Hendrick (Ed.), Syntax of the modern celtic languages, syntax and semantics (Vol. 23, pp. 199–248). New York and San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. McCloskey, J. (1991). Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua, 85, 259–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCloskey, J. (1998). Trí nóta comhréire. Ériu, 49, 165–169.Google Scholar
  44. McCloskey, J. (1999). On the right edge in Irish. Syntax, 2, 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCloskey, J. (2000). Reciprocals, parts, and wholes. In S. Chung, J. McCloskey, & N. Sanders (Eds.), WebFest for Jorge Hankamer, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, http://ling.ucsc.edu/jorge.
  46. McCloskey, J. (2005). Class materials from a course on Irish syntax. LSA Institute, Harvard and MIT, Summer 2005.Google Scholar
  47. McCloskey, J. (2007). Impersonals in Irish and beyond. In D. B. Gerdts, J. Moore, & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Hypothesis A/hypothesis B: Linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter. Mit Press (in press).Google Scholar
  48. McCloskey, J., & Hale, K. (1984). On the syntax of person number marking in modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1, 487–533.Google Scholar
  49. McCloskey, J., & Sells, P. (1988). Control and A-chains in modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 143–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nichols, J. (1986). Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language, 62, 558–119.Google Scholar
  51. Noonan, M. (1992). Case and syntactic geometry. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  52. Ó Curnáin, B. (1996). Aspects of the Irish of Iorras Aithneach, County Galway. Ph.D. thesis, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  53. Ó Sé, D. (2006). Agent phrases with the autonomous verb in Modern Irish. Ériu, 56, 85–115.Google Scholar
  54. Ó Siadhail, M. (1989). Modern Irish: Grammatical structure and dialectal variation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of english. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2001). T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 355–426). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2004). Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (Eds.), The syntax of time (pp. 495–538). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501–558.Google Scholar
  59. Stenson, N. (1981). Studies in Irish syntax. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  60. Stenson, N. (1989). Irish autonomous impersonals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thurneysen, R. (1946). A grammar of old Irish. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Linguistics, Stevenson Faculty ServicesUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations