Advertisement

Small Nominals

  • Asya PereltsvaigEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates Small Nominals, that is nominals that lack the DP projection. It is shown that Small Nominals can appear in argument positions, but even in argument positions they are non-referential. Thus, it is proposed that thematic relations underpinning argumenthood, on the one hand, and referentiality, on the other hand, do not rely on the same mechanism (e.g., referential indices). The analysis developed in this paper makes use of φ;-features instead of referential indices; specifically, referentiality is said to be encoded by means of φ;-feature values, which are unavailable until D° is merged. Finally, it is argued that the differences between languages without overt articles (e.g., Russian) and those with overt articles (e.g., Norwegian) are purely morphological rather than syntactic; both types of languages are shown to have both DPs and Small Nominals.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Thematic Relation Argument Position Referential Index Overt Article 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abney, Steven P. 1986. The English Noun Phrase and Its Sentential Aspect, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Asudeh, Ash, Line H., Mikkelsen 2000‘Incorporation in Danish: Implications for interfaces’Cann, R.Grover, C.Miller, P. eds. A Collection of Papers on Head-driven Phrase Structure GrammarCSLIStanford115Google Scholar
  3. Babby, Leonard H. 1975‘A Transformational Analysis of Transitive -sja Verbs in Russian’Lingua35297332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babby, Leonard H. 1987‘Case, Prequantifiers, and Discontinuous Agreement in Russian’Natural Language and Linguistic Theory591138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babko-Malaya Olga. (1999). Zero Morphology: A Study of Aspect, Argument Structure and Case, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  6. Bailyn, John Frederick. 2002‘Overt Predicators’Journal of Slavic Linguistics102352Google Scholar
  7. Bailyn John, Frederick.,  et al. 2004‘The Case of Q’Arnaudova, O. eds. Proceedings of FASL 12The Ottawa Meeting 2003. University of Michigan PressAnn Arbor MI136Google Scholar
  8. Baker, Mark C. 2003Lexical Categories Verbs, Nouns, and AdjectivesCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker, Mark C. 2003b. ‘Nominalization, Complementation and Polysynthesis’, paper presented at the CASTL Kick-Off Conference, University of Tromsø, Norway.Google Scholar
  10. Billings, Loren. 1995. Approximation in Russian and the Single-Word Constraint, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  11. Billings, Loren, Michael, Yadroff. 1996‘Prosodic correspondence in syntax: Russian approximative inversion’Kager, R.Zonneveld, W. eds. Phrasal PhonologyForisDordrecht4572Google Scholar
  12. Borer, Hagit. 2004Structuring Sense. An Exo-Skeletal Trilogy.Oxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Borthen, Kaja. 2003. Norwegian Bare Singulars, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.Google Scholar
  14. Bošković, željko. 2003. ‘A Minimalist Account of Genitive of Quantification’, paper presented at Formal Descriptions of Slavic Languages 5, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  15. Bošković, Željko. To appear. ‘On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP’, Studia Linguistica.Google Scholar
  16. Börjars, Kersti. 1998Feature Distribution in Swedish Noun PhrasesBlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowers, John A. 1993‘The Syntax of Predication’Linguistic Inquiry24591656Google Scholar
  18. Cardinaletti, Anna, Maria Teresa, Guasti. 1995‘Small Clauses: Some Controversies and Issues in Acquisition’Cardinaletti, A.Guasti, M.T. eds. Syntax and Semantics 28: Small ClausesAcademic PressNew York123Google Scholar
  19. Chierchia, Gennaro 1998‘Reference to Kinds Across Languages’Natural Language Semantics6339405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chomsky, Noam. 1995The Minimalist ProgramMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Chomsky, Noam.,  et al. 1998‘Some observations on Economy in Generative Grammar’Barbosa, P. eds. Is the Best Good Enough?. Optimality and Competition in SyntaxMIT PressCambridge, MA115127Google Scholar
  22. Chomsky, Noam.,  et al. 2000‘Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework’Martin, R. eds. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax Honor of Howard LasnikMIT PressCambridge, MA89156Google Scholar
  23. Chung, Sandra, William, Ladusaw. 2003Restriction and SaturationMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Corbett, Greville G. 1983Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers: Agreement Patterns in SlavicCroom HelmLondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Crockett, Dina B. 1976Agreement in Contemporary Standard RussianSlavica PublishersColumbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  26. Danon, Gabi. 2002. Case and Formal Definiteness: the Licensing of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases in Hebrew, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
  27. Engelhardt, Miriam. 2002‘Nominal Tough-Constructions’Ouhalla, J.Shlonsky, U. eds. Themes in Arabic and Hebrew syntaxKluwerDordrecht189216Google Scholar
  28. Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1977‘Embedded Clause Reduction and Scandinavian Gender Agreement’Journal of Linguistics13239257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiengo, Robert, Robert, May. 1994Indices and IdentityMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Filip, Hana.,  et al. 1992‘Aspect and Interpretation of Nominal Arguments’Canakis, C. eds. Papers from the Twenty-eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic SocietyThe University of Chicago PressChicago139158Google Scholar
  31. Filip, Hana. 2004. ‘The semantic structure of prefixed verbs and their arguments’, paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Boston.Google Scholar
  32. Fodor, Jerry A., Ernie, Lepore. 1999‘Impossible Words’Linguistic Inquiry30445453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Franks, Steven. 1994‘Parametric Properties of Numeral Phrases in Slavic’Natural Language and Linguistic Theory12597674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Franks, Steven. 1995Parameters of Slavic MorphosyntaxOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Franks, Steven, Asya, Pereltsvaig.,  et al. 2004‘Functional Categories in the Nominal Domain’Arnaudova, O. eds. Proceedings of FASL 12. The Ottawa Meeting 2003University of Michigan PressAnn Arbor, MI109128Google Scholar
  36. Geenhoven, Veerle 1998Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of West Greenlandic Noun IncorporationCSLIStanfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Graudina, Ljudmila Karlovna, Viktor Aleksandrovich Ickovich and Lia Pavlovna Katlinskaja. 1976. Grammatičeskaja pravil’nost’ russkoj reči. Opyt častotno-stilističeskogo slovarja variantov, Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
  38. Hale, Kenneth, Samuel Jay, Keyser. 1993‘On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations’Hale, K.Keyser, S.J. eds. The View from Building 20MIT PressCambridge MA53109Google Scholar
  39. Harley, Heidi. 2004‘Possession and the Double Object Construction’Pica, P.Rooryck, J. eds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2John BenjaminsAmsterdam3170Google Scholar
  40. Hellan, Lars. 1986‘The Headedness of NPs in Norwegian’Muysken, P.Riemsdijk, H. eds. Features and ProjectionsForisDordrecht89123Google Scholar
  41. Higginbotham, James. 2000‘Accomplishments’In: Proceedings of Glow in Asia IINanzan UniversityNagoya7282Google Scholar
  42. Julien, Marit. forthcoming. The Syntax of Scandinavian Nominal Phrases, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  43. Kallulli, Dalina. 1999. The Comparative Syntax of Albanian: On the Contribution of Syntactic Types to Propositional Interpretation, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Durham, Durham.Google Scholar
  44. Kiefer, Ferenc. 1994‘Noun Incorporation in Hungarian’Acta Linguistica Hungarica40149177Google Scholar
  45. King, Tracy Holloway, Mary, Dalrymple. 2004‘Determiner Agreement and Noun Conjunction’Journal of Linguistics4069104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kiparsky, Paul.,  et al. 1997‘Remarks on Denominal Verbs’Alsina, A. eds. Argument StructureCSLIStanford473499Google Scholar
  47. Klenin, Emily. 1980‘Individuation: An Historical Case Study’Chvany, C.Brecht, R. eds. Morphosyntax in SlavicSlavica PublishersColumbus6278Google Scholar
  48. Kratzer, Angelika. 1996‘Severing the External Argument from its verb’Rooryck, J.Zaring, L. eds. Phrase Structure and the LexiconKluwerDordrecht109138Google Scholar
  49. Landau, Idan. 2000Elements of Control. Structure and Meaning in Infinitival ConstructionsKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  50. Landman, Fred eds. 2004Indefinites and the Types of SetsBlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Levin, Beth.,  et al. 1985‘Case Theory and the Russian Reflexive Affix’Goldberget, J. eds. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistic Vol. 4CSLIStanford178191Google Scholar
  52. Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994‘Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-movement in Syntax and Logical Form’Linguistic Inquiry25609665Google Scholar
  53. Madariaga, Nerea. forthcoming. ‘Why Russian Semi-Predicative Items Always Agree’, Journal of Slavic Linguistics.Google Scholar
  54. Matthewson, Lisa. 1998Determiner Systems and Quantificational StrategiesHolland Academic GraphicsThe HagueGoogle Scholar
  55. McIntyre, Andrew. 2001. ‘Functional Interpretations: Borderline Idiosyncrasy in Prepositional Phrases and Other Expressions’, ms., University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
  56. Pazelskaya, Anna and Sergei Tatevosov. 2003. ‘Nominalization in Russian: Eventuality Types and Aspectual Properties’, paper presented at the Formal Descriptions of Slavic Languages 5, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  57. Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2000a. ‘Are All Small Clauses Created Equal? Evidence from Russian and Italian’, in M. Yoo and J. Steele (eds.), McGill Working Papers in Linguistics15(1), pp. 73104.Google Scholar
  58. Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2000‘Short and Long Adjectives in Russian: Against the Null-N° Analysis’ms, McGill UniversityMontréal.Google Scholar
  59. Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2001.On the Nature of Intra-Clausal Relations: A Study of Copular Sentences in Russian and Italian, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Montréal.Google Scholar
  60. Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2003. ‘Syntax of Denominal and Ditransitive Verbs Reconsidered’, paper presented at the Linguistic Association of Great Britain Annual Meeting, Oxford.Google Scholar
  61. Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and Categories, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  62. Peshkovskij, Aleksandr Matveevich. 1914/1956. Russkij sintaksis v nauchnom osveschenii [Russian Syntax in a scientific light], 7th edition, Uchpedgiz, Moscow.Google Scholar
  63. Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998‘Determiner Phrase in a Language without Determiners’Journal of Linguistics34165179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rappaport, Gilbert C. 1986‘On Anaphor Binding in Russian’Natural Language and Linguistic Theory497120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rappaport, Gilbert C. 1998. ‘The Slavic Noun Phrase’, position paper presented at Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  66. Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2001‘Extraction from Nominal Phrases in Polish and the Theory of Determiners’Journal of Slavic Linguistics8159198Google Scholar
  67. Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2002‘Numeral Phrases in Russian: A Minimalist Approach’Journal of Slavic Linguistics10327340Google Scholar
  68. Rappaport, Gilbert C. 2003‘Case Syncretism, Features, and the Morphosyntax of Polish Numeral Phrases’Banski, P.Przepiorkowski, A. eds. Generative Linguistics in Poland 5Academy of SciencesWarsaw123137Google Scholar
  69. Reinhart, Tanya, Eric, Reuland. 1993‘Reflexivity’Linguistic Inquiry24657720Google Scholar
  70. Ritter, Elizabeth. 1988‘A Head-movement Approach to Construct State Noun Phrases’Linguistics26909929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991‘Two Functional Categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew’Rothstein, S. eds. Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase StructureAcademic PressNew York3762Google Scholar
  72. Romanova, Eugenia and Marina Diakonova. 2003. ‘Prefixes and Objecthood’, paper presented at the CASTL Kick-Off Conference, University of Tromsø, Norway.Google Scholar
  73. Schmitt, Christina J., Alan, Munn. 2004‘The Syntax and Semantics of Bare Arguments in Brazilian Portuguese’Pica, P.Rooryck, J. eds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2John BenjaminsAmsterdam185216Google Scholar
  74. Siloni, Tal. 2003. Al binyan hitpa’el [About Binyan Hitpael], ms., Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
  75. Stepanov, Arthur. 2001‘Late Adjunction and Minimalist Phrase Structure’Syntax494125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Švedova, Natalia Juljevna. 1982. Russkaja Grammatika[Academy Grammar], Volume II: Sintaksis, “Sintaksis formy slova (obzor)”, Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
  77. Svenonius, Peter.,  et al. 2004‘On the Edge’Adger, D. eds. PeripheriesKluwerDordrecht259287Google Scholar
  78. Timberlake, Alan. 1986‘Hierarchies in the Genitive of Negation’Brecht, R.Levine, J. eds. Case in SlavicSlavica PublishersColumbus, OH338360Google Scholar
  79. Williams, Adger. 1993‘The Argument Structure of Sja-Predicates’Journal of Slavic Linguistics1167190Google Scholar
  80. Williams, Edwin S. 1985‘PRO and Subject of NP’Natural Language and Linguistic Theory3297315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Williams, Edwin. 1989‘The Anaphoric Nature of θ-roles’Linguistic Inquiry20425456Google Scholar
  82. Willim, Ewa. 1998‘On the DP-hypothesis in Polish, an articless language’Stalmaszczyk, P. eds. Projections and Mapping: Studies in SyntaxFOLIUMLublin137158Google Scholar
  83. Willim, Ewa.,  et al. 2000‘On the Grammar of Polish Nominals’Martin, R. eds. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard LasnikMIT PressCambridge MA319346Google Scholar
  84. Yadroff Michael, Loren Billings. (1998). ‘The Syntax of Approximative Inversion in Russian (and the general architecture of nominal expressions)’, in Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 319–338.Google Scholar
  85. Zolotova, Galina Aleksandrovna. 1988. Sintaksićeskij Slovar’ [Syntactic Dictionary], Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsCornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations