Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 103–167 | Cite as

The Rise and Fall of Second-position Clitics

Article

Abstract.

Historical accounts of the phenomenon of cliticization have previously documented only the loss of second-position clitics. This paper argues that the history of Bulgarian offers evidence for the rise of a second-position clitic system. It is demonstrated that the second-position clitics of Old Bulgarian were not directly inherited from Indo-European, but emerged from a system of post-verbal clitics. The findings provide evidence against the position that independent historical laws govern ‘natural’ directions of language change. In particular, they challenge the belief in the uniform tendency for clitics to develop into inflectional affixes. Instead, the findings suggest that language change reflects competition between grammatical options, which instantiate principles and parameters of UG based on the properties of the learning algorithm and the nature of the linguistic input, and which are not intrinsically ranked. An analysis of the historical change that led to the development of second-position clitics in Old Bulgarian is proposed that implicates a switch in the parameter of headedness of TP. Clitics in both the old and new grammars are attracted by T0. A change in the position of T0 relative to its complement triggers the reanalysis of clitics from pronominals forming a complex head with V0 to pronominals moving to the left edge of TP. The non-branching status of clitics makes them category-ambiguous (D0/DP), which allows them to merge in the syntactic structure as either heads or maximal projections. The paper also traces the eventual loss of the second-position clitic system in Bulgarian and argues that changes in the grammar of phrasal movement, specifically the loss of topicalization to Spec,TP, trigger the syntactic reanalysis of clitics from arguments moved and adjoined to TP, into adjuncts to functional heads in the extended projection of V0, resulting in the modern pre-verbal clitic system.

Keywords

Learning Algorithm Syntactic Structure Eventual Loss Historical Change Left Edge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric SyntaxJohn BenjaminsAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, Stephen 1993’Wackernagel’s Revenge: Clitics, Morphology and the Syntax of Second Position’Language696898Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Stephen 1997’Towards an Optimal Account of Second Position Phenomena’, in Dekkers J. et al. (eds.), Optimality Theory: Syntax, Phonology and AcquisitionOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Joseph, Aoun 1999’Clitic Doubled Arguments’Johnson, K.Roberts, I. eds. Beyond Principles and ParametersKluwerDordrecht1342Google Scholar
  5. Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas, Benmamoun 1998’Minimality, Reconstruction, and PFMovement’Linguistic Inquiry29569597Google Scholar
  6. Avgustinova, Tania 1994’On Bulgarian Verbal Clitics’Journal of Slavic Linguistics22947Google Scholar
  7. Barbosa, Pilar 1996Clitic Placement in European Portuguese and the Position of SubjectsHalpern, A.Zwicky, A. eds. Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena,CLSIStanford140Google Scholar
  8. Battye, Adrian, Ian, Roberts 1995IntroductionBattye, A.Roberts, I. eds. Clause Structure and Language ChangeOxford University PressOxford328Google Scholar
  9. Benincà, Paola 1995Complement Clitics in Medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia LawBattye, A.Roberts, I. eds. Clause Structure and Language ChangeOxford University PressOxford325344Google Scholar
  10. Bonet, Eulalia 1989’Postverbal Subjects in Catalan’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic AssociationUniversité de LavalQuébec CityGoogle Scholar
  11. Borer, Hagit 1986‘Introduction’Borer, H. eds. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Syntax and Semantics 19Academic PressNew York111Google Scholar
  12. Borsley, Robert, Ewa, Jaworska 1988‘A Note on Prepositions and Case Marking in Polish’Linguistic Inquiry19685691Google Scholar
  13. Bošković, Željko 2000Second Position Cliticization: Syntax and/or Phonology?Beukema, F.den Dikken, M. eds. Clitic Phenomena in European LanguagesJohn BenjaminsPhiladelphia71120Google Scholar
  14. Bošković, Željko 2001On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related PhenomeaNorth-HollandAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Bošković, Željko 2002’Clitics as Non-branching Elements and the Linear Correspondance Axiom’Linguistic Inquiry33329340Google Scholar
  16. de Bray, R.G.A. 1980Guide to the Slavonic Languages. Part 1: Guide to the South Slavonic Languages, 3rd ednColumbus OHSlavica Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Browne,Wayles. 1974. ’On the Problem of Enclitic Placement in Serbo-Croatian’, in R. D. Brecht and Catherine Chvany (eds.), Slavic Transformational Syntax, Michigan Slavic Materials 10, Ann Arbor, pp.36-52.Google Scholar
  18. Bybee, Joan,  et al. 1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the WorldUniversity of California PressBerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  19. Chomsky, Noam 1995The Minimalist ProgramMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Cinque, Gugliemo 1990Types of A’-dependenciesMIT PressCambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Cinque, Gugliemo 1999Adverbs and Functional HeadsOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Corve, Norbert 1992Left Branch ExtractionBroderick, K. eds. Proceedings of NELS 22AmherstMA: GLSA6784Google Scholar
  23. Dezsó, László 1982Typological Studies in Old Serbo-Croatian SyntaxKöln-WienBöhlau VerlagGoogle Scholar
  24. Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila 1995’Clitics in Slavic’Studia Linguistica.495492Google Scholar
  25. Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila. 1998. ‘Are Bulgarian Pronominal Clitics in the Wackernagel Position?’, in K. Gammelgaard, A.J. Morch, and O.M. Selberg (eds.), Norwegian Contributions to the Twelfth International Congress of Slavists, Meddelelser 80, 7–32.Google Scholar
  26. Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila, Lars, Hellan 1999’Clitics and Bulgarian Clause Structure’van Riemsdijk, H. eds. Clitics in the Languages of EuropeMouton de GruyterBerlin469514Google Scholar
  27. Duridanov, Ivan,  et al. 1993Gramatika na starobâlgarskija ezik: Fonetika, morfologija, sintaksis (A Grammar of Old Bulgarian: Phonetics, Morphology, and Syntax)Bulgarian Academy of Sciences PressSofiaGoogle Scholar
  28. Embick, David and Roumyana Izvorski. 1997. ‘Participle-Auxiliary Orders in Slavic’, in Wayles Browne and Draga Zec (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting, 1995, Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Embick, David, Rolf, Noyer 2001’Movement Operations after Syntax’Linguistic Inquiry32555595Google Scholar
  30. Fontana Josep. (1993). Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  31. Franks, Steven 1997’South Slavic Clitic Placement is Still Syntactic’Penn Working Papers in Linguistics4111126Google Scholar
  32. Franks Steven. (1998). ’Clitics in Slavic’, position paper at the Workshop on Comparative Slavic morpho-syntax, June 1998, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  33. Franks, Steven 2000’Clitics at the Interface’,Beukema, F.den Dikken, M eds. Clitic Phenomena in European Languages,John BenjaminsPhiladelphia146Google Scholar
  34. Franks, Steven and Ljiljana Progovac. 1994. ’On the Placement of Serbo-Croatian Clitics’, in G. Fowler, H Cooper, and J. Ludwig (eds.), Proceedings of 9th Conference on Balkan and South Slavic Linguistics, Literature and Folklore vol. 7, Bloomington: Indiana Slavic Studies, pp. 69-78.Google Scholar
  35. Franks, Steven, Tracy, King 2000A Handbook of Slavic CliticsOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Franks, Steven, Željko, Bošković 2001’An Argument for Multiple Spell-Out’Linguistic Inquiry32174183Google Scholar
  37. Friedemann, M.-A. 1992. ‘On the D-Structure Position of Subjects in French’, in S. Barbiers, M. den Dikken, and C. levelt (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Leiden Conference for Junior Linguists, pp. 155–168.Google Scholar
  38. Gâlâbov, Ivan 1971’Predgovor” (Preface)Rusev, PenjoGâlâbov, IvanDavidov, AngeDan¡cev, Georgi eds. ’Pohvalno slovo za Evtimij’ ot Grigorij Camblak. (Eulogy for Euthimij by Grigorij CamblakBulgarian Academy of Sciences PressSofia14151418Google Scholar
  39. Garrett Andrew. (1990). The Syntax of Anatolian Pronominal Clitics, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  40. Givó, Talmy 1971’Historical Syntax and Synchronic MorphologyAn Archaelogist’s Field Trip’ CLS.7394415Google Scholar
  41. Gribble, Charles 1988’On Clitics in Old Bulgarian and Old Russian’Schenker, A eds. American Contributions to the 10th International Congress of Slavists: Sofia, September 1988SlavicaColumbus OHGoogle Scholar
  42. Guasti Maria, Teresa 1993Causative and Perception Verbs: A Comparative StudyTurinRosenberg and SellierGoogle Scholar
  43. Halpern, Aaron 1995On the Placement and Morphology of CliticsStanfordCSLIGoogle Scholar
  44. Halpern, Aaron, Arnold, Zwicky 1996Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related PhenomenaStanfordCSLIGoogle Scholar
  45. Han, Chung-hye 2001’Force, Negation, and Imperatives’The Linguistic Review18289325Google Scholar
  46. Hirschbühler Paul and Marie Labelle. 2000. ’Evolving Tobler-Mussafia Effects in the Placement of French Clitics’, in Steven N. Dworkin and Dieter Wanner (eds.), New Approaches to Old Problems. Issues in Romance Historical Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 210). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 165-182.Google Scholar
  47. Hock, Hans 1996’Who’s on First? Towards a Prosodic Account of P2 Clitics’Halpern, AaronZwicky, Arnold eds. Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related PhenomenaCSLIStanford199270Google Scholar
  48. Ivanova-Mirčeva, , Dora, , Ivan, Haralampiev 1999Istoria na bulgarskija ezik (History of the Bulgarian Language)SofiaFaberGoogle Scholar
  49. Iatridou, Sabine. 1995. ’Clitics and Island Effects’, in R. Izvorski and V. Tredinnick (eds.), Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 11-30.Google Scholar
  50. Izvorski, Roumyana, Tracy, King, Catherine, Rudin 1997’Against Li-Lowering in Bulgarian’Lingua102187194Google Scholar
  51. Jaeggli, Oswaldo 1986’Three Issues in the Theory of Clitics’Borer, H. eds. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Syntax and Semantics 19Academic PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Kayne, Richard 1991’Romance Clitics, Verb Movement and PRO’Linguistic Inquiry22647686Google Scholar
  53. Klavans, Judith 1995On Clitics and CliticizationGarlandNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Kroch, Anthony 1989’Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change’Language Variation and Change1199244Google Scholar
  55. Kroch, Anthony. 1994. ‘Morphosyntactic Variation’, in Beals et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol 2, pp. 180–201.Google Scholar
  56. Legendre, Geraldine 1999’Morphological and Prosodic Alignment at Work: The Case of South-Slavic Clitics’Blake, S.J.Kim, E.-S.Shahin, K.N. eds. Proceedings of WCCFL XVII,CSLI PublicationsStanfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Lehmann, Cristian 1995Thoughts on GrammaticalizationLincom EuropaMunichGoogle Scholar
  58. Leskien, August 1922Handbuch der altbulgarischen SpracheCarl WinterHeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  59. Lightfoot, David 1999The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and EvolutionBlackwellLondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Lunt, Horace 2001Old Church Slavonic GrammarMouton de GruyterBerlinGoogle Scholar
  61. Marantz, Alec 1988’Clitics, Morphological Merger, and the Mapping to Phonological Structure’,Hammond, M.Noonan, M. eds. Theoretical MorphologyAcademic Press.San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  62. Marantz, Alec 1989’Clitics and Phrase Structure’Baltin, M.Kroch, A. eds. Alternative Conceptions of Phrase StructureUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  63. Masica, Colin 1991The Indo-Aryan LanguagesCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  64. Nevis Joel and Brian Joseph. (1992). ’Wackernagel Affixes: Evidence from Balto-Slavic’. Yearbook of Morphology. 93-111.Google Scholar
  65. Percus, Orin. 1993. ’The Captious Clitic: Problems in Serbo-Croatian Clitic Placement’, ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  66. Pintzuk, Susan 1996‘Cliticization in Old English’Halpern, AaronZwicky, Arnold eds. Second Position Clitics and Related PhenomenaCSLI PressStanford375409Google Scholar
  67. Pintzuk, Susan, George, Tsoulas, Anthony, Warner 2000’Syntactic Change: Theory and Method’. in Diachronic SyntaxOxford University PressOxford122Google Scholar
  68. Progovac, Ljiljana 1996’Clitics in Serbian/Croatian: Comp as the Second Position’Halpern, AaronZwicky, Arnold eds. Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related PhenomenaCSLIStanford411428Google Scholar
  69. Progovac, Ljiljana 2000’Where do Clitics Cluster?’Beukema, Fritsden Dikken, Marcel eds. Clitic Phenomena in European Languages,John BenjaminsPhiladelphia249258Google Scholar
  70. Radanović-Kocić Vesna. (1988). The Grammar of Serbo-Croatian Clitics: A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective, Ph.D. thesis. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  71. Radanović-Kocić, Vesna 1996’Placement of Serbo-Croatian Clitics: A Prosodic Approach’Halpern, AaronZwicky, Arnold eds. Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related PhenomenaCSLIStanford429445Google Scholar
  72. María Luisa, Rivero 1986’Parameters in the Typology of Clitics in Romance and Old Spanish’Language64774807Google Scholar
  73. Rivero, María Luisa 1994’Clause Structure and V-Movement in the Languages of the Balkans’Natural Language and Linguistic Theory1263120Google Scholar
  74. María Luisa, Rivero 1997.’On Two Locations for Complement Clitic Pronouns: Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian, and Old Spanish’van Kemenade, A.Vincent, N. eds. Parameters of Morphosyntactic ChangeCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  75. Roberts, Ian 1997Comparative SyntaxArnoldLondonGoogle Scholar
  76. Roberts, Taylor. 2000. Clitics and Agreement, Ph.D. thesis. MIT.Google Scholar
  77. Rosen, Sarah. 1989. Argument Structure and Complex Predicates, Ph.D. thesis, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  78. Rudin, Catherine 1997’Agr-O and Bulgarian Pronominal Clitics’,Lindseth, MartinaFranks, Stephen eds. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Indiana Meeting, 1996Michigan Slavic PublicationsAnn Arbo224252Google Scholar
  79. Rudin, Catherine, Christina, Kramer, Loren, Billings, Matthew, Baerman 1999’Macedonian and Bulgarian li Questions: Beyond Syntax’Natural Language and Linguistic Theory17541586Google Scholar
  80. Santorini, Beatrice 1993’Phrase Structure Change in the History of Yiddish’Language Variation and Change5257284Google Scholar
  81. Schenker, Alexander 1995The Dawn of SlavicYale University PressNew HavenGoogle Scholar
  82. Schick, Ivanka 2000’Clitic Doubling Constructions in Balkan-Slavic Languages’Beukema, Fritsden Dikken, Marcel eds. Clitic Phenomena in European LanguagesJohn BenjaminsPhiladelphia259292Google Scholar
  83. Schütze, Carlson 1994’Serbo-Croatian Second Position Clitic Placement and the Phonology-Syntax Interface’MITWPL21373473Google Scholar
  84. Sławski, Franciszek. 1946. Miejsce enklityki odmiennej w dziejach jezyka bułgarskiego (The Place of the Inflected Enclitic in the History of Bulgarian), Kraków: Polska Akademia UmiejetnościGoogle Scholar
  85. Sportiche, Dominique 1996’Clitic Constructions’Rooryck, JohanZaring, L. eds. Phrase Structure and the LexiconKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  86. Sreznevskij, Izmail 1958’Material’i dlja slovarja drevnerusskogo jazyka’ (Materials for an Old Russian Dictionary)State Press of Foreign and National DictionariesMoscowGoogle Scholar
  87. Stojkov, Stojko 1993Bâlgarska dialektologija (Bulgarian Dialectology)Bulgarian Academy of Sciences PressSofiaGoogle Scholar
  88. Taylor Ann. (1990). Clitics and Configurationality in Ancient Greek, Ph.D. thesis, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  89. Taylor, Ann. 1994’The Change from SOV to SVO in Ancient Greek’Language Variation and Change6138Google Scholar
  90. Tomić Olga, Mišeška 1996’The Balkan Slavic Clausal Clitics’Natural language and Linguistic Theory14811872Google Scholar
  91. Tomić, Olga Mišeška 2000’On Clitic Sites’Beukema, Fritsden Dikken, Marcel eds. Clitic Phenomena in European LanguagesJohn BenjaminsPhiladelphia293316Google Scholar
  92. Tomić Olga, Mišeška 2000’The Macedonian Negation Operator and Cliticization’Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.19647682Google Scholar
  93. Wackernagel, Jacob. 1892. ’Üer ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung’, Indogermanische Forschungen 1, 333-436. Reprinted in vol. 1: 1-104 of K. Latte (ed. vols. 1-2) and B. Forssman (ed. vol. 3) (1953, 1979). Kleine Schriften. Gvttingen.Google Scholar
  94. Wanner, Dieter 1987The Development of Romance Clitic Pronouns: From Latin to Old RomanceNouton de GruyterBerlinGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilder, Chris, D., Ćavar 1994’Long Head Movement Verb Movement and Cliticization in Croatian’Lingua93158Google Scholar
  96. Yang, Charles 2000’Internal and External Forces in Language Change’Language Variation and Change.12231250Google Scholar
  97. Zwicky, Arnold 1977On CliticsIndiana University Linguistics ClubBloomingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations