Natural Computing

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 219–237 | Cite as

A framework for machine learning based on dynamic physical fields

Article

Abstract

Despite recent successes and advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning, this domain remains under continuous challenge and guidance from phenomena and processes observed in natural world. Humans remain unsurpassed in their efficiency of dealing and learning from uncertain information coming in a variety of forms, whereas more and more robust learning and optimisation algorithms have their analytical engine built on the basis of some nature-inspired phenomena. Excellence of neural networks and kernel-based learning methods, an emergence of particle-, swarms-, and social behaviour-based optimisation methods are just few of many facts indicating a trend towards greater exploitation of nature inspired models and systems. This work intends to demonstrate how a simple concept of a physical field can be adopted to build a complete framework for supervised and unsupervised learning methodology. An inspiration for artificial learning has been found in the mechanics of physical fields found on both micro and macro scales. Exploiting the analogies between data and charged particles subjected to gravity, electrostatic and gas particle fields, a family of new algorithms has been developed and applied to classification, clustering and data condensation while properties of the field were further used in a unique visualisation of classification and classifier fusion models. The paper covers extensive pictorial examples and visual interpretations of the presented techniques along with some comparative testing over well-known real and artificial datasets.

Keywords

Machine learning Classification Classifier fusion Clustering Data condensation Visualisation Gravity field Electrostatic field Lennard-Jones potential 

References

  1. Wheeler JA (1989) Information, physics, quantum: the search for links. Proc of the Workshop on Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Santa Fe 3–28Google Scholar
  2. Klir GJ, Folger TA (1988) Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information. Prentice-Hall International EditionGoogle Scholar
  3. Zurek WH (1989) Complexity, entropy and the physics of information. Proc of the Workshop on Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Santa FeGoogle Scholar
  4. Hochreiter S, Mozer MC (2000) An electric approach to independent component analysis. Proc of the 2nd International Workshop on Independent Component Analysis and Signal Separation, Helsinki 45–50.Google Scholar
  5. Principe J, Fisher I, Xu D (2000) Information theoretic learning. In: Haykin S (ed) Unsupervised adaptive filtering. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Torkkola K, Campbell W (2000) Mutual information in learning feature transformations. Proc of International Conference on Machine Learning, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Torkkola K (2001) Nonlinear feature transforms using maximum mutual information. Proc of IJCNN’2001, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianini N (2004) Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M (1963) The Feynman lectures on physics. Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunningham SJ, Humphrey MC, Witten IH (1996) Understanding what machine learning produces part 2: Knowledge visualisation techniquesGoogle Scholar
  12. Ho TK (2002) Mirage—A tool for interactive pattern recognition from multimedia data. Proc of the Astronomical Data Analysis Software & Systems XII, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  13. Kittler J (1998) Combining classifiers: a theoretical framework. Pattern Anal Appl 1:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Girolami M, He C (2003) Probability density estimation from optimally condensed data samples. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 25(10):1253–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Intelligent Systems Research CentreBritish Telecom Group, Research & VenturingMartlesham Heath, IpswichUK
  2. 2.Computational Intelligence Research Group, School of Design, Engineering & ComputingBournemouth UniversityFern Barrow PooleUK

Personalised recommendations