Determination of protein structure and dynamics combining immune algorithms and pattern search methods
Natural proteins quickly fold into a complicated three-dimensional structure. Evolutionary algorithms have been used to predict the native structure with the lowest energy conformation of the primary sequence of a given protein. Successful structure prediction requires a free energy function sufficiently close to the true potential for the native state, as well as a method for exploring the conformational space. Protein structure prediction is a challenging problem because current potential functions have limited accuracy and the conformational space is vast. In this work, we show an innovative approach to the protein folding (PF) problem based on an hybrid Immune Algorithm (IMMALG) and a quasi-Newton method starting from a population of promising protein conformations created by the global optimizer DIRECT. The new method has been tested on Met-Enkephelin peptide, which is a paradigmatic example of multiple–minima problem, 1POLY, 1ROP and the three helix protein 1BDC. DIRECT produces an initial population of promising candidate solutions within a potentially optimal rectangle for the funnel landscape of the PF problem. Hence, IMMALG starts from a population of promising protein conformations created by the global optimizer DIRECT. The experimental results show that such a multistage approach is a competitive and effective search method in the conformational search space of real proteins, in terms of solution quality and computational cost comparing the results of the current state-of-art algorithms.
KeywordsClonal Selection Algorithms DIRECT Immune Algorithms pattern search methods protein folding protein structure prediction structural bioinformatics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bindewald E, Hesser J, Männer R (1998) Implementing genetic algorithms with sterical constrains for protein structure prediction. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN V), pp. 959–967, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Burnet FM (1959) The Clonal Selection Theory of Acquired Immunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Cutello V, Nicosia G, Pavone M (2004) Exploring the capability of Immune Algorithms: A characterization of hypermutation operators. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems (ICARIS’04), vol. 3239, pp.␣263–276, Catania, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Finkel DE (2003) DIRECT Optimization Algorithm User Guide. Technical Report, CRSC N.C. State University (ftp://ftp.ncsu.edu/pub/ncsu/crsc/pdf/crsc-tr03-11.pdf)Google Scholar
- Huang CC, Couch GS, Pettersen EF, Ferrin TE (1996) Chimera: An extensible molecular modeling application constructed using standard components. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 1, 724Google Scholar
- Kaiser CE Jr, Lamont GB, Merkle LD, Gates GH Jr, Patcher R (1997) Polypeptide structure prediction: Real-valued versus binary hybrid genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), pp. 279–286, San Jose, CAGoogle Scholar
- Li Z, Scheraga HA (1998) Structure and free energy of complex thermodynamics systems. Journal of Molecular Structure 179:333–352Google Scholar
- MacKerell AD Jr, Brooks B, Brooks C L III, Nilsson L, Roux B, Won Y, Karplus M (1998) CHARMM: The energy function and its parameterization with an overview of the program. In: Schleyer PvR et al. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, vol. 1, pp. 271–277. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- McLachlan AD (1982) Rapid comparison of protein structures. Acta cytologica A38: 871–873Google Scholar
- Nicosia G (2004) Immune Algorithms for Optimization and Protein Structure Prediction. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science. University of Catania, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Nicosia G, Cutello V, Bentley P, Timmis J (2004) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Tramontano A (2006) Protein Structure Prediction: Concepts and Applications. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar