Mycopathologia

, Volume 173, Issue 2–3, pp 113–119 | Cite as

Hydroxyurea Enhances Post-Fusion Hyphal Extension During Sexual Development in C. neoformans var. grubii

  • M. Naim Zulkifli
  • Jan Naseer Kaur
  • John C. Panepinto
Article

Abstract

Mating and sexual development in C. neoformans var. grubii strains of the H99 background is often less robust than that laboratory generated isogenic C. neoformans var. neoformans strains in the JEC21 background. In Candida albicans and Saccharomyces serevisiae, slowing of DNA synthesis and engagement of the replication stress response, such as that caused by treatment with hydroxyurea (HU), induces filamentation and pseudohyphal growth, respectively. In this study, we investigated the effect of HU treatment on C. neoformans var. grubii morphogenesis. Treatment with HU did not induce filamentation of yeast cells either in liquid culture or on solid YPD or V8 agar. In the presence of the opposite mating partner, we observed early emergence of hyphae in the presence of HU. Semi-quantitative analysis of fusion using marked strains demonstrated that no significant enhancement of fusion in the presence of HU. Transfer of fusion colonies from crosses performed in the absence of HU to V8 + HU revealed enhanced hyphal growth in the presence of HU. Analysis of expression of the target of HU, ribonucleotide reductase, revealed that a phylogenetically divergent catalytic subunit is replication stress responsive in C. neoformans. These results suggest that induction of replication stress promotes post-fusion hyphal growth of C. neoformans var. grubii strains in the H99 background.

Keywords

Mating Replication stress Hydroxyurea Sexual development Ribonucleotide reductase Filamentation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NRSA K22 AI070647 to JCP and startup funds from the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo.

References

  1. 1.
    Idnurm A, et al. Deciphering the model pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(10):753–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shi QM, et al. Critical role of DNA checkpoints in mediating genotoxic-stress-induced filamentous growth in Candida albicans. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18(3):815–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kolberg M, et al. Structure, function, and mechanism of ribonucleotide reductases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1699(1–2):1–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reichard P. From RNA to DNA, why so many ribonucleotide reductases? Science. 1993;260(5115):1773–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang PJ, et al. Rnr4p, a novel ribonucleotide reductase small-subunit protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(10):6114–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elledge SJ, Davis RW. DNA damage induction of ribonucleotide reductase. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9(11):4932–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Havel VE et al. Ccr4 Promotes Resolution of the ER Stress Response during Host Temperature Adaptation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;10(7):895–901.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bachewich C, Nantel A, Whiteway M. Cell cycle arrest during S or M phase generates polarized growth via distinct signals in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57(4):942–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang CM, Jiang YW. Genome-wide survey of non-essential genes required for slowed DNA synthesis-induced filamentous growth in yeast. Yeast. 2005;22(2):79–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yue C, et al. The STE12alpha homolog is required for haploid filamentation but largely dispensable for mating and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Genetics. 1999;153(4):1601–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chabes A, et al. Yeast ribonucleotide reductase has a heterodimeric iron-radical-containing subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(6):2474–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mulder KW, Winkler GS, Timmers HTM. DNA damage and replication stress induced transcription of RNR genes is dependent on the Ccr4-not complex. Nucl. Acids Res. 2005;33(19):6384–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guittet O, et al. Mammalian p53R2 protein forms an active ribonucleotide reductase in vitro with the R1 protein, which is expressed both in resting cells in response to DNA damage and in proliferating cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(44):40647–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lubelsky Y, Reuven N, Shaul Y. Autorepression of rfx1 gene expression: functional conservation from yeast to humans in response to DNA replication arrest. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(23):10665–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu X, Jiang YW. Possible integration of upstream signals at Cdc42 in filamentous differentiation of S. cerevisiae. Yeast. 2005;22(13):1069–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Enserink JM, et al. Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2006;175(5):729–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ballou ER et al. Two CDC42 paralogues modulate Cryptococcus neoformans thermotolerance and morphogenesis under host physiological conditions. Mol Microbiol. 2009;75(3):763–80.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vallim MA, et al. A Rac homolog functions downstream of Ras1 to control hyphal differentiation and high-temperature growth in the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4(6):1066–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Naim Zulkifli
    • 1
  • Jan Naseer Kaur
    • 1
  • John C. Panepinto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Witebsky Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, School of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesState University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations