Advertisement

Mycopathologia

, Volume 172, Issue 1, pp 73–76 | Cite as

Lack of Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis in Vaginal Candida albicans Isolates in Turkey Using HWP1 Gene Polymorphisms

  • Ramazan Gumral
  • Banu Sancak
  • Ahmet Barış Guzel
  • Mehmet Ali Saraçlı
  • Macit IlkitEmail author
Article

Abstract

Candida africana differs from the common strains of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis morphologically, physiologically, genetically, and, in particular, clinically. This fungal pathogen is primarily recovered from genital specimens, especially in vaginal specimens. In this investigation, we reexamined 195 vaginal C. albicans isolates for the presence of C. africana and C. dubliniensis by using hyphal wall protein 1 (HWP1) gene polymorphisms. All study isolates were confirmed to be C. albicans, and none were verified as either C. africana or C. dubliniensis. In conclusion, the HWP1 gene polymorphisms offer a useful tool in the discrimination of C. africana, C. albicans, and C. dubliniensis. Further studies may highlight the pathogenesis and importance of this yeast in vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Keywords

Candida africana Candida albicans Candida dubliniensis Chlamydospore HWP1 gene Vaginitis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We offer our sincere thanks to the physicians of Çukurova Maternity and Children’s Hospital for their efforts in the provision of clinical samples. We also thank Aygul Turaç-Biçer and Tuba Yuksel for their kind assistance in the laboratory workup.

References

  1. 1.
    Forche A, Schönian G, Gräser Y, Vilgalys R, Mitchell TG. Genetic structure of typical and atypical populations of Candida albicans from Africa. Fungal Genet Biol. 1999;28:107–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Odds FC, Bougnoux ME, Shaw DJ, et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Candida albicans. Euk Cell. 2007;6:1041–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romeo O, Criseo G. First molecular method between Candida africana, Candida albicans, and Candida dubliniensis by using hwp1 gene. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;62:230–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tietz HJ, Hopp M, Schmalreck A, Sterry W, Czaika V. Candida africana sp.nov., a new human pathogen or a variant of Candida albicans? Mycoses. 2001;44:437–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Hedaithy SSA, Fotedar R. Recovery and studies on chlamydospore-negative Candida albicans isolated from clinical specimens. Med Mycol. 2002;40:301–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alonso-Vargas R, Elorduy L, Eraso E, et al. Isolation of Candida africana, probable atypical strains of Candida albicans, from a patient with vaginitis. Med Mycol. 2008;46:167–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Romeo O, Criseo G. Morphological, biochemical and molecular characterisation of the first Italian Candida africana isolate. Mycoses. 2009;52:454–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tietz HJ, Küssner A, Thanos M, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of unusual vaginal isolates of Candida albicans from Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2462–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Romeo O, Criseo G. Molecular epidemiology of Candida albicans and its closely related yeast Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:212–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ozcan K, Ilkit M, Ates A, Turac-Bicer A, Demirhindi H. Performance of Chromogenic Candida Agar and CHROMagar Candida in recovery and presumptive identification of monofungal and polyfungal vaginal isolates. Med Mycol. 2010;48:29–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guzel AB, Ilkit M, Akar T, Burgut R, Demir SC. Evaluation of risk factors in patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis and the value of chromID Candida agar versus CHROMagar Candida for recovery and presumptive identification of vaginal yeast species. Med Mycol. 2011;49:16–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guzel AB, Ilkit M, Burgut R, Urunsak IF, Ozgunen FT. An evaluation of risk factors in pregnant women with Candida vaginitis and the diagnostic value of simultaneous vaginal and rectal sampling. Mycopathologia. 2011. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9392-z.
  13. 13.
    Turin L, Riva F, Galbiati G, Cainelli T. Fast, simple and highly sensitive double-rounded polymerase chain reaction assay to detect medically relevant fungi in dermatological specimens. Eur J Clin Invest. 2000;30:511–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Odds FC, Van Nuffel L, Dams G. Prevalence of Candida dubliniensis isolates in a yeast stock collection. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2869–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romeo O, Criseo G. Candida africana and its closest relatives. Mycoses. 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01939.x.
  16. 16.
    Acikgoz ZC, Sancak B, Gamberzade S, Mısırlıoglu M. Prevalence of Candida dubliniensis among the stored vaginal Candida isolates in a Turkish hospital. Mycoses. 2004;47:393–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Romeo O, de Leo F, Criseo G. Adherence of ability of Candida africana: a comparative study with Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis. Mycoses. 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01833.x.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramazan Gumral
    • 1
  • Banu Sancak
    • 2
  • Ahmet Barış Guzel
    • 3
  • Mehmet Ali Saraçlı
    • 1
  • Macit Ilkit
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyGulhane Military Medical AcademyAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of HacettepeAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of ÇukurovaAdanaTurkey
  4. 4.Division of Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of ÇukurovaAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations