, Volume 159, Issue 3, pp 433–439 | Cite as

Morphology and phylogeny of Botryosphaeria dothidea causing fruit rot of olives

  • A. J. L. Phillips
  • I. C. Rumbos
  • A. Alves
  • A. Correia


The taxonomic position of the causal agent of fruit rot of olives was determined from fresh collections of the fungus from central Greece. In culture it formed two types of conidia, namely fusiform, hyaline, aseptate conidia typical of the genus Fusicoccum, and dark-walled, ovoid, ellipsoid or fusiform, 1–2 septate conidia that are not typically observed in Fusicoccum. A phylogenetic analysis based on ITS and EF1-α sequences placed the fungus within the same clade as Fusicoccum aesculi, which is the anamorph of Botryosphaeria dothidea, and the type of the genus Fusicoccum.


Botryosphaeria dothidea Fusicoccum aesculi Olea europaea systematics taxonomy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Graniti, A 1993Olive scab: a reviewBulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin23377384Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jimènez-Diaz, RM, Tjamos, EC, Cirulli, M 1998Verticillium wilt of major tree hosts: oliveHiemstar, JAHarris, DC eds. A Compendium of Verticillium Wilt in Tree SpeciesPonsen and LooijenWageningen, the Netherlands1316Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thanassoulopoulos, CC, Birris, DA, Tjamos, EC 1979Survey of verticillium wilt of olive trees in GreecePlant Dis Rep63936940Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maublanc, A 1904Sur une maladie des olives due au Macrophoma dalmatica (Thüm.) Berl., VoglBull Soci Bot Fr20229232Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petri L (1915). Le malattie del olivo. Ist Microgr Ital, Firenze, 104–105Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarejanni, JA, Papa, AJ 1952La pathologie des mycoses á Macrophoma des olivesAnn Inst Phytopathol Benaki63750Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zachos, DG, Tzavella-Klonari, K 1979Recherches sur l’identitè et la position systématique du champignon qui provoque la maladie des olives attribuèe au champignon Macrophoma ou Sphaeropsis dalmaticaAnn Inst Phytopathol Benaki Nouv Sèr125971Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thümen, F 1883Die Pilze des OelbaumesBoll Soc Adriatica Sci Nat Trieste8215244Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saccardo PA (1884). Sylloge fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum 3: 1–860Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berlese, AN, Voglino, P 1886Sopra un nuovo genere di Funghi sferopsideiAtti della Soc Veneto-Trentina Sci Nat10176205Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gigante, R 1934Ricerche sulla morfologia, la biologia et la posizione sistematica del fungo che é stato descritto comme Macrophoma dalmaticaBoll Ric Stazione Patol Veg, n.s.14125172Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aa HA van der, Vanev S (2002). A revision of the species described in Phyllosticta. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures,Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anonymous (1968). Plant Pathologists Pocketbook. Kew, England: CMI,Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alves, A, Correia, A, Luque, J, Phillips, AJL 2004Botryosphaeria corticola sp. nov. on Quercus species, with notes and description of Botryosphaeria stevensii and its anamorph Diplodia mutilaMycologia96598613Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal genes for phylogenies. In: PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 315–322Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carbone, I, Kohn, AM 1999A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetesMycologia91553556Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swofford DL (2003). PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, Sinauer AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hillis, DM, Bull, JJ 1993An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysisSyst Biol42182192Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sutton BC (1980). The Coelomycetes. Kew, England: Commonwealth Mycological InstituteGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Slippers, B, Crous, PW, Denman, S, Coutinho, TA, Wingfield, BD, Wingfield, MJ 2004Combined multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several species previously identified as Botryosphaeria dothideaMycologia9683101Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van der, Aa HA 1973Studies in Phyllosticta IStud Mycol5110Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petrak, F, Sydow, H 1927Die Gattungen der Pyrenomyzeten, Sphaeropsideen und MelanconieenBeih Rep spec nov regni veg421551Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petrak, F. 1961Macrophoma sapinea (Fr.) Petr. in den Föhrenwäldern des niederösterreichischen WaldviertelsSydowia15309316Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Crous, PW, Palm, ME 1999Reassessment of the Botryosphaeria anamorph genera Fusicoccum, Dothiorella and BotryodiplodiaSydowia52167175Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Denman, S, Crous, PW, Taylor, JE, Kang, J-C, Pascoe, I, Wingfield, MJ 2000An overview of the taxonomic history of Botryosphaeria, and a re-evaluation of its anamorphs based on morphology and ITS rDNA phylogenyStud Mycol45129140Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. L. Phillips
    • 1
  • I. C. Rumbos
    • 2
  • A. Alves
    • 3
  • A. Correia
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Recursos Microbiològicos, Faculdade de Ciências e TecnologiaUniversidade Nova de LisboaCaparicaPortugal
  2. 2.Plant Protection Institute of VolosVolosGreece
  3. 3.Centro de Biologia Celular, Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations