Advertisement

An improved implicit method for mechanical systems with set-valued friction

  • Runsen Zhang
  • Yang Yu
  • Qi WangEmail author
  • Qingyun Wang
Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The computational procedures of higher-order implicit integrators for mechanical systems with friction are provided in this paper. The dynamic equations are established using the augmented Lagrangian formulation, and set-valued friction forces are described by projection functions. To reduce the accuracy loss caused by event transitions and to eliminate spurious oscillations in the acceleration, a new robust event-driven scheme, which accurately detects event transitions and corrects the friction forces and accelerations at switching points, is proposed. The numerical performance of the proposed scheme is demonstrated by solving several benchmark problems. Numerical results show that the newly developed scheme can approximately achieve second-order accuracy, and they are more accurate than the classical Moreau time-stepping scheme under close computational efforts. Finally, a slider-crank system is simulated to prove the validity of the developed method for nonlinear mechanical systems with friction.

Keywords

Set-valued friction Implicit integrators Projection function Spurious oscillations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript and we are grateful for the support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (11772021, 11702009).

References

  1. 1.
    Acary, V.: Higher order event capturing time-stepping schemes for nonsmooth multibody systems with unilateral constraints and impacts. Appl. Numer. Math. 62(10), 1259–1275 (2012) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acary, V.: Projected event-capturing time-stepping schemes for nonsmooth mechanical systems with unilateral contact and Coulomb’s friction. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 256, 224–250 (2013) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Acary, V.: Energy conservation and dissipation properties of time-integration methods for nonsmooth elastodynamics with contact. J. Appl. Math. Mech./Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 96(5), 585–603 (2016) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bathe, K.J.: Conserving energy and momentum in nonlinear dynamics: a simple implicit time integration scheme. Comput. Struct. 85(7–8), 437–445 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bathe, K.J., Baig, M.M.I.: On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics. Comput. Struct. 83(31–32), 2513–2524 (2005) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bathe, K.J., Noh, G.: Insight into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics. Comput. Struct. 98, 1–6 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brüls, O., Acary, V., Cardona, A.: Simultaneous enforcement of constraints at position and velocity levels in the nonsmooth generalized-\(\alpha \) scheme. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 281, 131–161 (2014) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chatelet, E., Michon, G., Manin, L., Jacquet, G.: Stick/slip phenomena in dynamics: choice of contact model. Numerical predictions & experiments. Mech. Mach. Theory 43(10), 1211–1224 (2008) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, Q.Z., Acary, V., Virlez, G., Brüls, O.: A newmark-type integrator for flexible systems considering nonsmooth unilateral constraints. In: IMSD 2012-2nd Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics. Stuttgart, Germany (2012) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, Q.z., Acary, V., Virlez, G., Brüls, O.: A nonsmooth generalized-\(\alpha \) scheme for flexible multibody systems with unilateral constraints. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 96(8), 487–511 (2013) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung, J., Hulbert, G.: A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha \) method. J. Appl. Mech. 60(2), 371–375 (1993) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doyen, D., Ern, A., Piperno, S.: Time-integration schemes for the finite element dynamic Signorini problem. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33(1), 223–249 (2011) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fan, X., Walker, P.D., Wang, Q.: Modeling and simulation of longitudinal dynamics coupled with clutch engagement dynamics for ground vehicles. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 43(2), 153–174 (2018) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flores, P., Leine, R., Glocker, C.: Modeling and analysis of planar rigid multibody systems with translational clearance joints based on the non-smooth dynamics approach. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 23(2), 165–190 (2010) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flores, P., Leine, R., Glocker, C.: Application of the nonsmooth dynamics approach to model and analysis of the contact-impact events in cam-follower systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 69(4), 2117–2133 (2012) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flores, P., Machado, M., Seabra, E., da Silva, M.T.: A parametric study on the Baumgarte stabilization method for forward dynamics of constrained multibody systems. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 6(1), 011,019 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foerg, M., Geier, T., Neumann, L., Ulbrich, H.: r-Factor strategies for the augmented Lagrangian approach in multibody contact mechanics. In: Proceedings of III European Conference on Computational Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 20 p. (2006) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hilber, H.M., Hughes, T.J., Taylor, R.L.: Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 5(3), 283–292 (1977) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Issanchou, C., Acary, V., Pérignon, F., Touzé, C., Le Carrou, J.L.: Nonsmooth contact dynamics for the numerical simulation of collisions in musical string instruments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143(5), 3195–3205 (2018) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klepp, H.J.: Trial-and-error based method for the investigation of multi-body systems with friction. J. Sound Vib. 5(197), 629–637 (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leine, R.I., Glocker, C.: A set-valued force law for spatial Coulomb-Contensou friction. Eur. J. Mech. A, Solids, 22(2), 193–216 (2003) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ma, Y., Yu, S., Wang, D.: Vibration analysis of an oscillator with non-smooth dry friction constraint. J. Vib. Control 23(14), 2328–2344 (2017) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marques, F., Flores, P., Claro, J.P., Lankarani, H.M.: A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 86(3), 1407–1443 (2016) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mashayekhi, M.J., Kövecses, J.: A comparative study between the augmented Lagrangian method and the complementarity approach for modeling the contact problem. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 40(4), 327–345 (2017) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moreau, J.J.: Unilateral contact and dry friction in finite freedom dynamics. In: Nonsmooth Mechanics and Applications, pp. 1–82. Springer, Berlin (1988) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pennestrì, E., Rossi, V., Salvini, P., Valentini, P.P.: Review and comparison of dry friction force models. Nonlinear Dyn. 83(4), 1785–1801 (2016) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pešek, L., Hajžman, M., Püst, L., Zeman, V., Byrtus, M., Brüha, J.: Experimental and numerical investigation of friction element dissipative effects in blade shrouding. Nonlinear Dyn. 79(3), 1711–1726 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pfeiffer, F.: On non-smooth dynamics. Meccanica 43(5), 533–554 (2008) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pfeiffer, F.: On impacts with friction. Appl. Comput. Math. 217(3), 1184–1192 (2010) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pfeiffer, F., Foerg, M., Ulbrich, H.: Numerical aspects of non-smooth multibody dynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195(50–51), 6891–6908 (2006) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rahmanian, S., Ghazavi, M.R.: Bifurcation in planar Slider–Crank mechanism with revolute clearance joint. Mech. Mach. Theory 91, 86–101 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schindler, T., Rezaei, S., Kursawe, J., Acary, V.: Half-explicit timestepping schemes on velocity level based on time-discontinuous Galerkin methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 290, 250–276 (2015) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tang, L., Liu, J.: Modeling and analysis of sliding joints with clearances in flexible multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 94(4), 2423–2440 (2018) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Theodosiou, C., Natsiavas, S.: Dynamics of finite element structural models with multiple unilateral constraints. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 44(4), 371–382 (2009) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Transeth, A.A., Leine, R.I., Glocker, C., Pettersen, K.Y.: Non-smooth 3d modeling of a snake robot with external obstacles. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. pp. 1189–1196. IEEE, Kunming, China (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Transeth, A.A., Leine, R.I., Glocker, C., Pettersen, K.Y., Liljebäck, P.: Snake robot obstacle-aided locomotion: modeling, simulations, and experiments. IEEE Trans. Robot. 24(1), 88–104 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wood, W.L., Bossak, M., Zienkiewicz, O.C.: An alpha modification of newmark’s method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 15(10), 1562–1566 (1980) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xiang, W., Yan, S., Wu, J.: Dynamic analysis of planar mechanical systems considering stick-slip and stribeck effect in revolute clearance joints. Nonlinear Dyn. 95(1), 321–341 (2019) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yu, S.: An efficient computational method for vibration analysis of unsymmetric piecewise-linear dynamical systems with multiple degrees of freedom. Nonlinear Dyn. 71(3), 493–504 (2013) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yu, S., Wen, B.: Vibration analysis of multiple degrees of freedom mechanical system with dry friction. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 227(7), 1505–1514 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang, H., Xing, Y.: A three-parameter single-step time integration method for structural dynamic analysis. Acta Mech. Sin. 35(1), 112–128 (2019) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhao, Z., Liu, C., Wang, N.: Rocking dynamics of a planar rectangular block on a rigid surface. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 45(1), 105–125 (2019) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhao, Z., Lu, J., Wang, Q., Liu, C., Wang, Q.: The effect of non-spherical aspect of a dimer on the dynamic behaviors. Nonlinear Dyn. 94(3), 2191–2204 (2018) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zheng, X., Zhang, F., Wang, Q.: Modeling and simulation of planar multibody systems with revolute clearance joints considering stiction based on an lcp method. Mech. Mach. Theory 130, 184–202 (2018) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zheng, X., Zhang, R., Wang, Q.: Comparison and analysis of two Coulomb friction models on the dynamic behavior of Slider–Crank mechanism with a revolute clearance joint. Appl. Math. Mech. 39(9), 1239–1258 (2018) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhuang, F., Wang, Q.: Modeling and simulation of the nonsmooth planar rigid multibody systems with frictional translational joints. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 29(4), 403–423 (2013) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhuang, F., Wang, Q.: Modeling and analysis of rigid multibody systems with driving constraints and frictional translation joints. Acta Mech. Sin. 30(3), 437–446 (2014) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aeronautics Science and EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations