Advertisement

Multibody System Dynamics

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 191–221 | Cite as

Development of a multibody system for crashworthiness certification of aircraft seat

  • M. Guida
  • A. Manzoni
  • A. Zuppardi
  • F. Caputo
  • F. Marulo
  • A. De Luca
Article

Abstract

This work proposes a multibody approach in the simulation of 16-g aircraft seats, referred to the front-row of seats located behind bulkheads compliance with the Head Injury Criteria (HIC) requirement. The multibody model of the seat structure has been developed and analysed by using a home-made algorithm implemented in Matlab® code, as a 2D system of rigid bodies interconnected by springs and joints. The research has been oriented to assess the capability of simulating a 16g frontal impact of a sled equipped with the seat of a regional aircraft on which an anthropomorphic dummy is arranged. This sled test, for which experimental data were available, has been used as test case; inertial and structural properties of the system have also been experimentally and numerically evaluated in order to make the numerical model compliant with the real one.

One of the primary goals of the paper is to provide an intuitive, easily extendable numerical tool to support designers in multibody simulation and to define a tool able to obtain global sled-test results in very short time, especially if compared to the computational time of a detailed finite element simulation. This tool will allow running sensitivity analysis and first level optimisation of key design parameters, integrating itself in the design cycle, not in place of, but as a support to the main simulation tools.

Keywords

Anthropomorphic sled test Numerical design tool Multibody simulation Crashworthy design 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Astori, P., Impari, F.: “Crash response optimisation of helicopter seat and subfloor. Int. J. Crashworthiness 18(6), 570–578 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dhole, N.E.: Development and validation of a finite element model of a transport aircraft seat under part 25.562 dynamic test conditions. Bachelor thesis, University of Pune (2006) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gabler, H., Bowen, D., Molnar, C.: Modeling of commuter category aircraft seat. Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-04/34, US Department of Transportation (2004) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schoenbeck, A., Schultz, M.: Emerging technologies in aircraft crashworthiness. Naval Air Warfare Center (1999) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anon: Dynamic evaluation of seat restraint systems and occupant protection on transport airplanes. Federal Aviation Administration, AC No. 25-562 (2006) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    14 CFR Part 25, Advisory Circular AC25.562-1B: Dynamic evaluation of seat restraint systems and occupant protection on transport airplanes (2006) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soltis, S.J.: Overview of usage of crash dynamic analytical methods in civil aircraft research and certification programs. Federal Aviation Administration Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olschinka, C., Schumacher, A.: Dynamic simulation of flight passenger seats. In: 5th LSDyna Conference (2006) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lankarni, H., Bhone, P.: Finite Element Modeling Strategies for Dynamic Aircraft Seats. Society of Automotive Engineers, New York (2008) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fasanella, E.L., Jackson, K.E.: Impact testing and simulation of a crashworthy composite fuselage section with energy-absorbing seats and dummies. NASA TM-2002-211731 (2002) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vadlamudi, S., Blundell, M.V., Zhang, Y.: A multi-body systems approach to simulate helicopter occupant protection systems. Helisafe TA report, Conventry University (2011) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lorenzi, V., Riva, R., Camposaragna, M., Strada, R., Zappa, B.: Metodi numerici per lo studio di sistemi multicorpo. University of Bergamo Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laulusa, A., Bauchau Olivier, A.: Review of classical approaches for constraint enforcement in multibody systems. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 3(1), 011004 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kindervater, C.M., Johnson, A.F.: Crash and impact simulation of aircraft structure—hybrid and FE based approaches. DLR, Institute of Structures and Design (2000) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bauchau, O.A., Laulusa, A.: Review of contemporary approaches for constraint enforcement in multibody systems. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 3(1), 011005 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schoenbeck, A., Schultz, M.: Emerging technologies in aircraft crashworthiness. Naval Air Warfare Center (1999) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adams, A., Lankarani, H.M., Nick, M.: Development of New Crashworthiness Evaluation Strategy for Aircraft Seats. American Society of Engineering Education, New York (2003) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Title 49 code of Federal Regulations Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 49 CFR 572, Subpart B: Anthropomorphic test dummies (ATD), edition 10-1-88 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Advanced General Aviation Transportation Experiments Program: Methodology for seat design and certification by analysis, AGATE-WP3.4-034012- 079-REPORT, Rev. A, August 2001 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Federal Aviation Administration, Advisory Circular 25.562-1A: Dynamic evaluation of seat restraint systems & occupant protection on transport airplanes, January 1996 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Federal Aviation Administration, Advisory Circular 23.562-1: Dynamic testing of part 23 airplane seat/restraint system and occupant protection, June 1989 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baumgarte, J.: Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1(1), 1–16 (1972). 1972 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flores, P.: A parametric study on the Baumgarte stabilization method for forward dynamics of constrained multibody systems. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 6(1), 011019 (2011). 2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hallquist, J.: LS-DYNA Theory Manual. LSTC (2006) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Luca, A., di Caprio, F., Milella, E., Lamanna, G., Ignarra, M., Caputo, F.: On the tensile behaviour of CF and CFRP materials under high strain rates. Key Eng. Mater. 754, 111–114 (2017) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    TASS International Inc.: MADYMO Theory Manual, Release 7.2 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversità di Napoli Federico IINapoliItaly
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Information EngineeringUniversity of Campania L. VanvitelliAversaItaly

Personalised recommendations