Advertisement

System reduction in multibody dynamics of wind turbines

  • K. Holm-JørgensenEmail author
  • S. R. K. Nielsen
Article

Abstract

A system reduction scheme is devised related to a multibody formulation from which the dynamic response of a wind turbine is determined. In this formulation, each substructure is described in its own frame of reference, which is moving freely in the vicinity of the moving substructure. The Ritz bases spanning the reduced system comprises of rigid body modes and some dynamic low-frequency elastic eigenmodes compatible to the kinematic constraints of the related substructure. The high-frequency elastic modes are presumed to cause merely quasi-static displacements, and thus are included in the expansion via a quasi-static correction. The results show that by using the derived reduction scheme it is only necessary with 2 dynamical modes for the blade substructure when the remaining modes are treated as quasi-static. Moreover, it is shown that it has little to none effect if the gyroscopic stiffness matrix during a stopped situation or under nominal operational conditions is used to derive the functional basis of the modal expansion.

Keywords

Multibody dynamics System reduction Quasi-static modal model Wind turbine 

References

  1. 1.
    Craig, R.R. Jr.: Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analysis: An Overview. Collection of Technical Papers—AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, vol. 5, pp. 3–14 (2000) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hurty, W.C.: Dynamic analysis of structural systems using component modes. AIAA J. 3(4), 678–685 (1965) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rubin, S.: Improved component-mode representation for structural dynamic analysis. AIAA J. 13(8), 995–1006 (1975) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    MacNeal, R.H.: A hybrid method of component mode synthesis. Comput. Struct. 1(4), 581–601 (1971) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Preumont, A.: Vibration Control of Active Structures, an Introduction, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam (2002) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nikravesh, P.E.: Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems. Prentice-Hall, New York (1988) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Jalón, J.G., Bayo, E.: Kinematic and Dynamic Simulations of Multibody Systems—The Real-Time Challenge. Springer, Berlin (1993) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Géradin, M., Cardona, A.: Flexible Multibody Dynamics—A Finite Element Approach. Wiley, New York (2001) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shabana, A.A.: Substructure synthesis methods for dynamic analysis of multi-body systems. Comput. Struct. 20(4), 737–744 (1985) zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, J.-H.: On the application of the modal integration method to flexible multibody systems. Comput. Struct. 59(3), 553–559 (1996) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pan, W., Mao, S., Haug, E.J., Solis, D.: Efficient modal approach for flexible multibody dynamic simulation. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 31(1), 1–23 (2003) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khulief, Y.A., Mohiuddin, M.A.: On the dynamic analysis of rotors using modal reduction. Finite Elements Anal. Des. 26(1), 41–55 (1997) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bauchau, O.A., Rodriguez, J.: Formulation of modal-based elements in nonlinear, flexible multibody dynamics. J. Multiscale Comput. Eng. 1(2), 161–179 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bauchau, O.A., Rodriguez, J., Chen, S.-Y.: Coupled rotor-fuselage analysis with finite motions using component mode synthesis. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 49(2), 201–211 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kawamoto, A., Inagaki, M., Aoyama, T., Yasuda, K.: Vibration of Moving Flexible Bodies (Formulation of Dynamics by using Normal Modes and a Local Observer Frame). Proceeding of DETC99/VIB-8232 (1999) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawamoto, A., Krenk, S., Suzuki, A.: Flexible body dynamics in a freely floating local frame. In: ECCOMAS Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Milan, 25–28 June (2007) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kawamoto, A., Suzuki, A., Inagaki, M., Krenk, S.: Flexible-body dynamics in a floating frame with extraction of rigid body motion. In: 4th Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics, ACMD 2008, Jeju, Korea, August 20–23 (2008) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kawamoto, A., Krenk, S., Suzuki, A., Inagaki, M.: Flexible body dynamics in a local frame of reference with explicitly predicted motion. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. (2008) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krenk, S.: Non-linear modelling and analysis of structures and solids. Lecture notes. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (2005) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Géradin, M., Rixen, D.: Mechanical Vibrations: Theory and Application to Structural Dynamics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1997) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Larsen, J.W., Nielsen, S.R.K.: Non-linear dynamics of wind turbine wings. J. Non-Linear Mech. 41(5), 629–643 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations