Generalization of the ordinary state-based peridynamic model for isotropic linear viscoelasticity

  • Rolland Delorme
  • Ilyass Tabiai
  • Louis Laberge Lebel
  • Martin Lévesque
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This paper presents a generalization of the original ordinary state-based peridynamic model for isotropic linear viscoelasticity. The viscoelastic material response is represented using the thermodynamically acceptable Prony series approach. It can feature as many Prony terms as required and accounts for viscoelastic spherical and deviatoric components. The model was derived from an equivalence between peridynamic viscoelastic parameters and those appearing in classical continuum mechanics, by equating the free energy densities expressed in both frameworks. The model was simplified to a uni-dimensional expression and implemented to simulate a creep-recovery test. This implementation was finally validated by comparing peridynamic predictions to those predicted from classical continuum mechanics. An exact correspondence between peridynamics and the classical continuum approach was shown when the peridynamic horizon becomes small, meaning peridynamics tends toward classical continuum mechanics. This work provides a clear and direct means to researchers dealing with viscoelastic phenomena to tackle their problem within the peridynamic framework.

Keywords

Linear viscoelasticity Relaxation Creep Peridynamics Classical continuum mechanics Thermodynamics 

References

  1. Agwai, A., Guven, I., Madenci, E.: Predicting crack initiation and propagation using XFEM, CZM and peridynamics: a comparative study. In: 2010 Proceedings 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, ECTC (2010) Google Scholar
  2. Asemi, S.R., Farajpour, A., Borghei, M., Hassani, A.H.: Thermal effects on the stability of circular graphene sheets via nonlocal continuum mechanics. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 11(4), 704–724 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. bin Azizi, M.A., bin Mohd Ihsan, A.K.A., bin Nik Mohamed, N.A.: The peridynamic model of viscoelastic creep and recovery. Multidiscip. Model. Mater. Struct. 11(4), 579–597 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bažant, Z.P.: Why continuum damage is nonlocal: micromechanics arguments. J. Eng. Mech. 117(5), 1070–1087 (1991) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bažant, Z.P., Jirásek, M.: Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress. J. Eng. Mech. 128(11), 1119–1149 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belytschko, T., Black, T.: Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 45(5), 601–620 (1999) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Biot, M.: Theory of stress-strain relations in anisotropic viscoelasticity and relaxation phenomena. J. Appl. Phys. 25(11), 1385–1391 (1954) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bobaru, F., Hu, W.: The meaning, selection, and use of the peridynamic horizon and its relation to crack branching in brittle materials. Int. J. Fract. 176(2), 215–222 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bobaru, F., Yang, M., Alves, L.F., Silling, S.A., Askari, E., Xu, J.: Convergence, adaptive refinement, and scaling in 1d peridynamics. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 77(6), 852–877 (2009) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorduncu, M., Barut, A., Madenci, E.: Peridynamic truss element for viscoelastic deformation. In: 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, p. 1721 (2016) Google Scholar
  11. Du, Q.: Chapter 4 local limits and asymptotically compatible discretizations. In: Handbook of Peridynamic Modeling, pp. 87–108. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016) Google Scholar
  12. Dugdale, D.: Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 8(2), 100–104 (1960) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eringen, A.C., Edelen, D.: On nonlocal elasticity. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 10(3), 233–248 (1972) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Eringen, A.C., Speziale, C., Kim, B.: Crack-tip problem in non-local elasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 25(5), 339–355 (1977) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster, J.T., Silling, S.A., Chen, W.: An energy based failure criterion for use with peridynamic states. Int. J. Multiscale Comput. Eng. 9(6), 675–688 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffith, A.A.: The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 221, 163–198 (1921). Containing papers of a mathematical or physical character CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu, Y., De Carvalho, N., Madenci, E.: Peridynamic modeling of delamination growth in composite laminates. Compos. Struct. 132, 610–620 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Irwin, G.R.: Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. J. Appl. Mech. 24, 361–364 (1957) Google Scholar
  19. Jia, L.: A Dugdale–Barenblatt model for a plane stress semi-infinite crack under mixed mode concentrated forces. Int. J. Fract. 88(2), 153–166 (1997) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kadau, K., Germann, T.C., Lomdahl, P.S.: Molecular dynamics comes of age: 320 billion atom simulation on BlueGene/L. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 17(12), 1755–1761 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knauss, W., Ravi-Chandar, K.: Some basic problems in stress wave dominated fracture. In: Dynamic Fracture, pp. 1–17. Springer, Berlin (1985) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Grand, S., Götz, A.W., Walker, R.C.: SPFP: speed without compromise—a mixed precision model for GPU accelerated molecular dynamics simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184(2), 374–380 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lévesque, M., Derrien, K., Baptiste, D., Gilchrist, M.D.: On the development and parameter identification of Schapery-type constitutive theories. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 12(2), 95–127 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luk-Cyr, J., Crochon, T., Li, C., Lévesque, M.: Interconversion of linearly viscoelastic material functions expressed as Prony series: a closure. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 17(1), 53–82 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macek, R.W., Silling, S.A.: Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 43(15), 1169–1178 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mase, G., Smelser, R., Mase, G.: Continuum Mechanics for Engineers. CRC Series in Computational Mechanics and Applied Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London (2009) MATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell, J.A.: A non-local, ordinary-state-based viscoelasticity model for peridynamics. Sandia National Lab., Report 8064, pp. 1–28 (2011) Google Scholar
  28. Moës, N., Belytschko, T.: X-fem, de nouvelles frontières pour les éléments finis. Rev. Eur. Éléments Finis 11(2–4), 305–318 (2002) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Seleson, P.: Improved one-point quadrature algorithms for two-dimensional peridynamic models based on analytical calculations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 282, 184–217 (2014) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Silling, S.A.: Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48(1), 175–209 (2000) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Silling, S.A.: Origin and effect of nonlocality in a composite. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 9(2), 245–258 (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silling, S.A., Askari, E.: A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput. Struct. 83(17), 1526–1535 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silling, S.A., Lehoucq, R.B.: Convergence of peridynamics to classical elasticity theory. J. Elast. 93(1), 13–37 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Silling, S.A., Lehoucq, R.B.: Peridynamic theory of solid mechanics. Adv. Appl. Mech. 44(1), 73–166 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silling, S.A., Epton, M., Weckner, O., Xu, J., Askari, E.: Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J. Elast. 88, 151–184 (2007) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Tian, X., Du, Q.: Analysis and comparison of different approximations to nonlocal diffusion and linear peridynamic equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51(6), 3458–3482 (2013) MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Weckner, O., Mohamed, N.A.N.: Viscoelastic material models in peridynamics. Appl. Math. Comput. 219(11), 6039–6043 (2013) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Multiscale Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering Dept.Polytechnique MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Advanced Composite and Fiber Structures Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Dept.Polytechnique MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations