Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 83–111 | Cite as

The compressive behavior of isocyanate-crosslinked silica aerogel at high strain rates

Original Article

Abstract

Aerogels are low-density, highly nano-porous materials. Their engineering applications are limited due to their brittleness and hydrophilicity. Recently, a strong lightweight crosslinked silica aerogel has been developed by encapsulating the skeletal framework of amine-modified silica aerogels with polyureas derived by isocyanate. The mesoporous structure of the underlying silica framework is preserved through conformal polymer coating, and the thermal conductivity remains low. Characterization has been conducted on the thermal, physical properties and the mechanical properties under quasi-static loading conditions. In this paper, we present results on the dynamic compressive behavior of the crosslinked silica aerogel (CSA) using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). A new tubing pulse shaper was employed to help reach the dynamic stress equilibrium and constant strain rate. The stress-strain relationship was determined at high strain rates within 114–4386 s−1. The effects of strain rate, density, specimen thickness and water absorption on the dynamic behavior of the CSA were investigated through a series of dynamic experiments. The Young’s moduli (or 0.2% offset compressive yield strengths) at a strain rate ∼350 s−1 were determined as 10.96/2.08, 159.5/6.75, 192.2/7.68, 304.6/11.46, 407.0/20.91 and 640.5/30.47 MPa for CSA with densities 0.205, 0.454, 0.492, 0.551, 0.628 and 0.731 g cm−3, respectively. The deformation and failure behaviors of a native silica aerogel with density (0.472 g cm−3), approximately the same as a typical CSA sample were observed with a high speed digital camera. Digital image correlation technique was used to determine the surface strains through a series of images acquired using high speed photography. The relative uniform axial deformation indicated that localized compaction did not occur at a compressive strain level of ∼17%, suggesting most likely failure mechanism at high strain rate to be different from that under quasi-static loading condition. The Poisson’s ratio was determined to be 0.162 in nonlinear regime under high strain rates. CSA samples failed generally by splitting, but were much more ductile than native silica aerogels.

Keywords

Aerogel Crosslinked silica aerogel Nano-porous materials Nanofoam Split Hopkinson pressure bar Dynamic failure High speed photography Digital image correlation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barthelat, F., Wu, Z., Prorok, B.C., Espinosa, H.D.: Dynamic torsion testing of nanocrystalline coating using high speed photography and digital image correlation. Exp. Mech. 43(3), 331–340 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. Bertino, M.F., Hund, J.F., Zhang, G., Sotiriou-Leventis, C., Tokuhiro, A.T., Leventis, N.: Room temperature synthesis of noble metal clusters in the mesopores of mechanically strong silica-polymer aerogel composites. J. Sol.-Gel. Sci. Technol. 30(1), 43–48 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruck, H.A., McNeill, S.R., Sutton, M.A., Peters, W.H.: Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differental correction. Exp. Mech. 29(3), 261–267 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, W., Zhou, B.: Constitutive behavior of Epon 828/T-403 at various strain rates. Mech. Time-Dep. Mater. 2(2), 103–111 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, W., Zhang, B., Forrestal, M.J.: A split Hopkinson bar technique for low-impedance material. Exp. Mech. 39(2), 81–85 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, W., Lu, F., Cheng, M.: Tension and compression testing of two polymers under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Polym. Test. 21(2), 113–121 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, W., Luo, H.: Dynamic compressive testing of intact and damaged ceramics. Ceramic Eng. Sci. Proc. 24(3), 411–416 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, W., Luo, H.: Dynamic compressive responses of intact and damaged ceramics from a single split Hopkinson pressure bar experiment. Exp. Mech. 44(2), 295–299 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. Chu, T.C., Ranson, W.F., Sutton, M.A., Peters, W.H.: Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp. Mech. 25(2), 232–244 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frew, D.J., Forrestal, M.J., Chen, W.: A split Hopkinson bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials. Exp. Mech. 41(1), 40–46 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frew, D.J., Forrestal, M.J., and Chen, W.: Pulse-shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Exp. Mech. 42(1), 93–106 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. Frew, D.J., Forrestal, M.J., Chen, W.: Pulse shaping techniques for testing elastic-plastic material with a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Exp. Mech. 45(2), 186–195 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. Fricke, J.: Aerogels-highly tenuous solids with fascinating properties. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 100, 69–173 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gama, B.A., Lopatnikov, S.L., Gillespie, J.W.: Hopkinson bar experimental technique: A critical review. Appl. Mech. Rev. 57(4), 223–250 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson, L.J.: Mechanical behavior of metallic foams. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 30, 181–227 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray, G.T.: Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar technique. Mech. Test. Eval. ASM Handbook 8, 462–476 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. Katti, A., Shimpi, N., Roy, S., Lu, H., Fabrizio, E.F., Dass, A., Capadona, L.A., Leventis, N.: Chemical, physical, and mechanical characterization of isocyanate cross-linked amine-modified silica aerogels. Chem. Mater. 18(2), 285–296 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knauss, W.G., Kenner, V.H.: On the hygrothermomechanical characterization of polyvinylacetate. J. Appl. Phys. 51(10), 5131–5136 (1980)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Knauss, W.G., Zhu, W.: Nonlinearly viscoelastic behavior of polycarbonate. I. Response under pure shear. Mech. Time. dep. Mater. 6(3), 231–269 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leventis, N., Sotiriou-Leventis, C., Zhang, G., Rawashdeh, A.M.: Nanoengineering strong silica aerogels. Nano Lett. 2(9), 957–960 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Leventis, N., Palczer, A., McCorkle, L., Zhang, G., Sotiriou-Leventis, C.: Nanoengineered silica polymer composite aerogels with no need for supercritical fluid drying. J. Sol. Gel. Sci. Technol. 35(2), 99–105 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu, H., Vendroux, G., Knauss, W.G.: Surface deformation measurements of a cylindrical specimen by digital image correlation. Exp. Mech. 37(4), 433–439 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu, H., Cary, P.D.: Deformation measurements by digital image correlation: Implementation of a second-order displacement gradient. Exp. Mech. 40(4), 393–400 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luo, H., Chen, W.: Dynamic compressive response of intact and damaged AD995 alumina. Int. J. Appl. Ceramic Technol. 1(3), 254–260 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meador, M.A.B., Fabrizio, E.F., Ilhan, F., Dass, A., Zhang, G., Vassilaras, P., Johnston, J.C., Leventis, N.: Cross-linking amine-modified silica aerogels with epoxies: Mechanical strong lightweight porous materials. Chem. Mater. 17(5), 1085–1098 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miner, M.R., Hosticka, B., and Norris, P.M.: The effects of ambient humidity on the mechanical properties and surface chemistry of hygroscopic silica aerogel. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 350, 285–289 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Ravichandran, G., Subhash, G.: Critical appraisal of limiting strain rates for compression testing of ceramics in a split Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 77(1), 263–267 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pierre, A.C., Pajonk, G.M.: Chemistry of aerogels and their applications. Chem. Rev. 102(11), 4243–4265 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peters, W.H., Ranson, W.F.: Digital imaging techniques in experimental stress analysis. Opt. Eng. 21(3), 427–432 (1982)Google Scholar
  30. Song, B., Chen, W.: Dynamic stress equilibration in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests on soft materials. Exp. Mech. 44(3), 300–312 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. Song, B., Chen, W., Dou, S., Winfree, N., Kang, J.H.: Strain-rate effects on elastic and early cell-collapse response of a polystyrene foam. Int. J. Impact Eng. 31(5), 509–521 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sutton, M.A., Wolters, W.J., Ranson, W.F., McNeil, S.R.: Determination of displacements using an improved digital image correlation method. Image Vision Comput. 1(3), 133–139 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sutton, M.A., Cheng, M., Peters, W.H., Chao, Y.J., McNeill, S.R.: Application of an optimized digital correlation method to planar deformation analysis. Image Vis. Comput. 4(3), 143–150 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thayer, A.M., Houston, C.E.: Large chemical and materials companies target small nanotechnology firms for venture investing, collaborations, and product innovations. in “Nanomaterials” Cover Story in Chemical and Engineering News 81(35), Sept.1, 2003, pp15–22Google Scholar
  35. Woignier, T., Reynes, J., Alaoui, A.H. et al.: Different kinds of structure in aerogels: relationships with the mechanical properties. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 241(1), 45–52 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. Woignier, T., Phalippou, J.: Mechanical Strength of silica aerogels. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 100, 404–408 (1988)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. Vendroux, G., Knauss, W.G.: Submicron deformation field measurements: Part 2. Improved digital image correlation. Exp. Mech. 38(2), 86–92 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang, L.M., Shim, V.P.W.: An analysis of stress uniformity in split Hopkinson bar test specimens. Int. J. Impact Eng. 31(2), 129–150 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang, G., Dass, A., Rawashdeh, A.M., Thomas, J., Counsil, J.A., Sotiriou-Leventis, C., Fabrizio, E.F., Ilhan, F., Vassilaras, P., Scheiman, D.A., McCorkle, L., Palczer, A., Johnston, J.C., Meador, M.A., Leventis, N.: Isocyanate-crosslinked silica aerogel monoliths: Preparation and characterization. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 350, 152–164 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao, H., Gary, G.: A new method for the separation of waves: Application to the SHPB Technique for an unlimited duration of measurements. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 45(7), 1185–1202 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterU.S.A.
  2. 2.Division-Polymers BranchNASA Gleen Research CenterClevelandU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Missouri-RollaRollaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations