Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Generalized fractional derivative based adaptive algorithm for image denoising

  • 24 Accesses


This paper presents a new image denoising algorithm based on fractional filters. The fractional filters are derived using a newly introduced fractional operator. The proposed algorithm identifies the noisy pixels based on pixel-density and upgrades them by an adaptive fractional integral mask. To maintain the correlation and recover the lost information, the noise-free pixels are also processed by an adaptive fractional differential mask. We formulate the order function for the fractional mask with the help of gradient features and variance of the image. The algorithm is applied to standard images of different characteristics. The experimental results are compared with some other existing techniques. Evaluation parameters and visual perceptions show that the proposed method performs better than most of the discussed methods. The proposed approach is applicable for image denoising due to its applicability over different types of noises and denoising performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12


  1. 1.

    Agrawal OP (2010) Generalized variational problems and Euler–Lagrange equations. Comput Math Appl 59(5):1852–1864

  2. 2.

    Arora S, Hanmandlu M, Gupta G (2018) Filtering impulse noise in medical images using information sets. Pattern Recogn Lett, 1–9

  3. 3.

    Bai J, Feng X-C (2007) Fractional-order anisotropic diffusion for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(10):2492–2502

  4. 4.

    Bai T, Tan J, Hu M, Wang Y (2014) A novel algorithm for removal of salt and pepper noise using continued fractions interpolation. Signal Process 102:247–255

  5. 5.

    Bhatnagar G, Wu QMJ, Raman B (2013) Discrete fractional wavelet transform and its application to multiple encryption. Inform Sci 223:297–316

  6. 6.

    Chan RH, Ho C-W, Nikolova M (2005) Salt-and-pepper noise removal by median-type noise detectors and detail-preserving regularization. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(10):1479–1485

  7. 7.

    Chen Pi-Y, Lien C-Y (2008) An efficient edge-preserving algorithm for removal of salt-and-pepper noise. IEEE Signal Process Lett 15:833–836

  8. 8.

    Chen Q-Q, Hung M-H, Zou F (2017) Effective and adaptive algorithm for pepper-and-salt noise removal. IET Image Process 11(9):709–716

  9. 9.

    Cuesta E, Kirane M, Malik SA (2012) Image structure preserving denoising using generalized fractional time integrals. Signal Process 92(2):553–563

  10. 10.

    Deng X, Ma Y, Dong M (2016) A new adaptive filtering method for removing salt and pepper noise based on multilayered PCNN. Pattern Recogn Lett 79:8–17

  11. 11.

    Dong F, Chen Y, Kong D-X, Yang B (2015) Salt and pepper noise removal based on an approximation of l0 norm. Comput Math Appl 70(5):789–804

  12. 12.

    Erkan U, Gökrem L (2018) A new method based on pixel density in salt and pepper noise removal. Turkish J Electr Eng Comput Sci 26(1):162–171

  13. 13.

    Erkan U, Gökrem L, Enginoğlu S (2018) Different applied median filter in salt and pepper noise. Comput Electr Eng 70:789–798

  14. 14.

    Esakkirajan S, Veerakumar T, Adabala N, Subramanyam CH (2011) PremChand: removal of high density salt and pepper noise through modified decision based unsymmetric trimmed median filter. IEEE Signal Process Lett 18(5):287–290

  15. 15.

    Gonzalez RC, Woods RE et al (2002) Digital image processing. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 141(7)

  16. 16.

    González-Hidalgo M, Massanet S, Mir A, Ruiz-Aguilera D (2018) Improving salt and pepper noise removal using a fuzzy mathematical morphology-based filter. Appl Soft Comput 63:167–180

  17. 17.

    He N, Wang J-B, Zhang L-L, Lu K (2015) An improved fractional-order differentiation model for image denoising. Signal Process 112:180–188

  18. 18.

    Hilfer R (2000) Applications of fractional calculus in physics, vol 35. World Scientific

  19. 19.

    Hu J, Pu Y-F, Zhou J (2011) A novel image denoising algorithm based on Riemann-Liouville definition. JCP 6(7):1332–1338

  20. 20.

    Ibrahim H, Kong NSP, Ng TF (2008) Simple adaptive median filter for the removal of impulse noise from highly corrupted images. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 54(4):1920–1927

  21. 21.

    Jalab HA, Ibrahim RW (2015) Fractional Alexander polynomials for image denoising. Signal Process 107:340–354

  22. 22.

    Jayasree S, Bodduna K, Pattnaik PK, Siddavatam R (2014) An expeditious cum efficient algorithm for salt-and-pepper noise removal and edge-detail preservation using cardinal spline interpolation. J Vis Commun Image Represent 25(6):1349–1365

  23. 23.

    Jin R, Kim J (2017) Tracking feature extraction techniques with improved SIFT for video identification. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):5927–5936

  24. 24.

    Jin KH, Ye JC (2018) Sparse and low-rank decomposition of a hankel structured matrix for impulse noise removal. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(3):1448–1461

  25. 25.

    Junior EI, Garces LM, Cabrera AJ, Pimenta TC (2016) Performance analysis of algorithms over FPGA for removing salt and pepper noise. IEEE Lat Am Trans 14(5):2120–2127

  26. 26.

    Justusson BI (1981) Median filtering: statistical properties. In: Two-dimensional digital signal prcessing II. Springer, pp 161–196

  27. 27.

    Kalra GS, Singh S (2016) Efficient digital image denoising for gray scale images. Multimed Tools Appl 75(8):4467–4484

  28. 28.

    Li B, Xie W (2016) Image denoising and enhancement based on adaptive fractional calculus of small probability strategy. Neurocomputing 175:704–714

  29. 29.

    Li Z, Liu G, Xu Y, Cheng Y (2014) Modified directional weighted filter for removal of salt & pepper noise. Pattern Recogn Lett 40:113–120

  30. 30.

    Li Z, Cheng Y, Tang K, Xu Y, Zhang D (2015) A salt & pepper noise filter based on local and global image information. Neurocomputing 159:172–185

  31. 31.

    Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66

  32. 32.

    Podlubny I (1998) Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, vol 198. Elsevier

  33. 33.

    Pu Y-F, Zhou J-L, Yuan X (2010) Fractional differential mask: a fractional differential-based approach for multiscale texture enhancement. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(2):491–511

  34. 34.

    Samko SG, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI (1993) Fractional integrals and derivatives: theory and applications. CRC, pp 1993

  35. 35.

    Shukla AK, Pandey RK, Yadav S (2018) Salt and pepper noise removal algorithm based on generalized fractional operator. Int J Pure Appl Math 119(16):5147–5158

  36. 36.

    Toh KKV, Isa NAM (2010) Noise adaptive fuzzy switching median filter for salt-and-pepper noise reduction. IEEE Signal Process Lett 17(3):281–284

  37. 37.

    Varatharajan R, Vasanth K, Gunasekaran M, Priyan M, Gao XZ (2017) An adaptive decision based kriging interpolation algorithm for the removal of high density salt and pepper noise in images. Comput Electr Eng, 1–15

  38. 38.

    Vijaykumar VR, Santhana Mari G, Ebenezer D (2014) Fast switching based median–mean filter for high density salt and pepper noise removal. AEU-Int J Electron Commun 68(12):1145–1155

  39. 39.

    Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13 (4):600–612

  40. 40.

    Wang X, Shen S, Shi G, Xu Y, Zhang P (2016) Iterative non-local means filter for salt and pepper noise removal. J Vis Commun Image Represent 38:440–450

  41. 41.

    Wang Y, Wang J, Song X, Han L (2016) An efficient adaptive fuzzy switching weighted mean filter for salt-and-pepper noise removal. IEEE Signal Process Lett 23(11):1582–1586

  42. 42.

    Yang Q, Chen D, Zhao T, Chen Y (2016) Fractional calculus in image processing: a review. Fract Calculus Appl Anal 19(5):1222–1249

  43. 43.

    You X, Du L, Cheung Y-m, Chen Q (2010) A blind watermarking scheme using new nontensor product wavelet filter banks. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(12):3271–3284

  44. 44.

    Yu J, Tan L, Zhou S, Wang L, Siddique MA (2017) Image denoising algorithm based on entropy and adaptive fractional order calculus operator. IEEE Access 5:12275–12285

  45. 45.

    Zhang P, Li F (2014) A new adaptive weighted mean filter for removing salt-and-pepper noise. IEEE Signal Process Lett 21(10):1280–1283

  46. 46.

    Zhang X, Xiong Y (2009) Impulse noise removal using directional difference based noise detector and adaptive weighted mean filter. IEEE Signal Process Lett 16 (4):295–298

  47. 47.

    Zhang J, Liu J, Li T, Zheng Y, Wang J (2017) Gaussian mixture model learning based image denoising method with adaptive regularization parameters. Multimed Tools Appl 76(9):11471–11483

  48. 48.

    Zheng Y, Li M, Zhang J, Wang J (2018) Selection of regularization parameter in GMM based image denoising method. Multimed Tools Appl 77(22):30121–30134

  49. 49.

    Zhou H, Schaefer G, Liu T, Lin F (2010) Segmentation of optic disc in retinal images using an improved gradient vector flow algorithm. Multimed Tools Appl 49(3):447–462

Download references


The authors sincerely thank the reviewers for their constructive comments to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Rajesh K. Pandey.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shukla, A.K., Pandey, R.K. & Reddy, P.K. Generalized fractional derivative based adaptive algorithm for image denoising. Multimed Tools Appl (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08641-y

Download citation


  • Fractional calculus
  • Image denoising
  • Enhancement
  • Texture