Advertisement

Collaborative hashing adopted in locality-constrained linear coding for scene classification

  • Zhiping ZhouEmail author
  • Chunye Li
  • Xiaoxiao Zhao
  • Fangzheng Zhou
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Scene classification methods based on effective feature extraction and coding have obtained promising results in recent years. But the K-nearest neighbor search strategy in Locality-constrained Linear Coding (LLC) increases the complexity of the algorithm due to the exhaustive search. To solve the problem, an improved approximate nearest neighbor search strategy is proposed to improve the computational efficiency of LLC. Considering the mapping relationship between the visual words and features, a collaborative hashing method is incorporated to transform the high dimensional features into binary code form, and the original Euclidean space is transformed into the Hamming space that consists of multi similar features. The similar visual words can be queried quickly. Then the nearest neighbors can be searched efficiently through Hamming distance ranking, which can improve the coding efficiency. The experimental results on standard datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, and the average classification accuracy can be improved.

Keywords

Approximate nearest neighbor Locality-constrained linear coding Collaborative hashing 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Alimjan G, Sun T, Liang Y, Jumahun H, Guan Y (2018) A new technique for remote sensing image classification based on combinatorial algorithm of SVM and KNN. IJPRAI 32(7):1–23Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andoni A, Indyk P, Laarhoven T, Razenshteyn IP, Schmidt L (2015) Practical and optimal LSH for angular distance. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 28: annual conference on neural information processing systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp 1225–1233Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen J, He X, Song X, Zhang H, Nie L, Chua TS (2018) Venue prediction for social images by exploiting rich temporal patterns in lbsns. In: MultiMedia Modeling, Bangkok,Thailand, pp 327–339Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jin Z, Hu Y, Lin Y, Zhang D, Lin S, Cai D, Li X (2014) Complementary projection hashing. In: IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 257–264Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kong W, Li W (2012) Double-bit quantization for hashing. In: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. AAAI Press, pp 634–640Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J (2006) Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, New York, NY, USA. IEEE, pp 2169–2178Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu X, He J, Lang B, Chang S (2013) Hash bit selection: a unified solution for selection problems in hashing. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Portland, OR, USA, pp 1570–1577Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu X, He J, Deng C, Lang B (2014) Collaborative hashing. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Columbus, OH, USA. IEEE Computer Society, pp 2147–2154Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–110MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Min H, Liang M, Luo R, Zhu J (2016) Laplacian regularized locality-constrained coding for image classification. Neurocomputing 171:1486–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moran S, Lavrenko V, Osborne M (2013) Variable bit quantisation for LSH. In: Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, ACL, Sofia, Bulgaria, vol 2. The Association for Computer Linguistics, pp 753–758Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nie L, Wang M, Gao Y, Zha ZJ, Chua TS (2013) Beyond text qa: multimedia answer generation by harvesting web information. IEEE Trans Multimedia 15(2):426–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nie L, Zhao YL, Akbari M, Shen J (2015) Bridging the vocabulary gap between health seekers and healthcare knowledge. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 27 (2):396–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siagian C, Itti L (2007) Rapid biologically-inspired scene classification using features shared with visual attention. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(2):300–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sivic J, Zisserman A (2003) Video google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In: 9th IEEE international conference on computer vision, Nice, France. IEEE, pp 1470–1477Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang J, Yang J, Yu K, Lv F, Huang T, Gong Y (2010) Locality-constrained linear coding for image classification. In: The twenty-third IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, San Francisco, CA, USA. IEEE, pp 3360–3367Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xie L, Shen J, Zhu L (2016) Online cross-modal hashing for web image retrieval. In: AAAI, pp 294–300Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xie L, Shen J, Han J, Zhu L, Shao L (2017) Dynamic multi-view hashing for online image retrieval. In: IJCAI, pp 3133–3139Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang J, Yu K, Gong Y, Huang TS (2009) Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Miami, Florida, USA. IEEE, pp 1794–1801Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu K, Zhang T, Gong Y (2009) Nonlinear learning using local coordinate coding. In: 23rd annual conference on neural information processing systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Curran Associates, Inc, pp 2223–2231Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu J, Tao D, Rui Y, Cheng J (2013) Pairwise constraints based multiview features fusion for scene classification. Pattern Recogn 46(2):483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang H, Berg AC, Maire M, Malik J (2006) SVM-KNN: discriminative nearest neighbor classification for visual category recognition. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, New York, NY, USA. IEEE Computer Society, pp 2126–2136Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang D, Wang J, Cai D, Lu J (2010) Self-taught hashing for fast similarity search. In: SIGIR. ACM, New York, NY, US, pp 18-25Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang Z, Wang Q, Ruan L, Si L (2014) Preference preserving hashing for efficient recommendation. In: The 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. ACM, pp 183–192Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou K, Zha H (2012) Learning binary codes for collaborative filtering. In: The 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Beijing, China. ACM, pp 498–506Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiping Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Chunye Li
    • 1
  • Xiaoxiao Zhao
    • 3
  • Fangzheng Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Internet of Things EngineeringJiangnan UniversityWuxiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Engineering Research Center of Internet of Things Technology Applications Ministry of EducationJiangnan UniversityWuxiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Electronics and Information EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations